https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5301
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12596
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77456
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48776
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60335
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 4 03:01:33 2018
New Revision: 262370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262370=gcc=rev
Log:
i386: Add indirect_return function attribute
On x86, swapcontext may return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT |[7/8 Regression] SEGFAULT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jul 4 02:19:35 2018
New Revision: 262368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262368=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86274 - SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86398
Bug ID: 86398
Summary: is_trivially_constructible always returns true even
when is_constructible returns false
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180703
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380
--- Comment #4 from Colin Bartlett ---
>(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> > I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but:
> >
> > 1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86396
Bug ID: 86396
Summary: fold calls to strtod() into constants where possible
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86396
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but:
>
> 1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented
> also in choose_multiplier?
>
> 2. Is that anyway any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86387
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
Bug ID: 86395
Summary: add support of -fopt-info-inline in early inliner
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380
--- Comment #2 from Colin Bartlett ---
I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but:
1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented also
in choose_multiplier?
2. Is that anyway any reason not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86394
Bug ID: 86394
Summary: Broken -falign-functions=512 on m68k
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 85694, which changed state.
Bug 85694 Summary: Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 3 17:33:28 2018
New Revision: 262354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262354=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85694
* config/i386/sse.md (uavg3_ceil): New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
I'm not sure if this answers your question, but compiling the same program
(modifying 8 to 128 to tease the compiler into using zmm registers) with
clang-6 works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jul 3 16:38:16 2018
New Revision: 262353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262353=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86201
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 3 16:27:04 2018
New Revision: 262352
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262352=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier.
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 3 16:25:55 2018
New Revision: 262351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262351=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier.
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC's behaviour is correct by the resolution of https://wg21.link/cwg1778 but
apparently that rule causes problems. Maybe Clang doesn't support it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
I'm not so sure. Consider the following minimal test file:
#include
#include
int main(void) {
double * X, * Y, * Z;
X = (double *) calloc(8, sizeof(double));
Y = (double *)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 44348
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44348=edit
x86 target patch
I'm testing the attached patch for x86 targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> I'd prefer existing ordering relative to alphabetical: the list produced by
> GCC is mostly ordered first by manufacturer, then by
> generation/capabilities.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392
--- Comment #3 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Thank you very much for the explanation and sorry for using the wrong platform
;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Bug ID: 86393
Summary: GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #3)
> BUT if this code generates warnings there is a problem: obviously I don't
> want to tell downstream developers that "it's ok, just ignore the warnings"
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Component|driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
It's quite unlikely (pun intended) that code randomly sprinkled with various
non-standard annotations (attributes, pragmas, or otherwise) will eventually
have the same effect across all implementations once
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392
--- Comment #1 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 44347
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44347=edit
The example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392
Bug ID: 86392
Summary: templatized friend member function needs declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2018
New Revision: 262347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262347=gcc=rev
Log:
[17/n] PR85694: AArch64 support for AVG_FLOOR/CEIL
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jul 3 14:25:38 2018
New Revision: 262345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262345=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/84306
* g++.dg/overload/conv-op3.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86391
Bug ID: 86391
Summary: Cannot pass array as aliased formal parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jul 3 14:21:15 2018
New Revision: 262344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262344=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86202
* gimple-fold.c (size_must_be_zero_p): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 3 14:13:02 2018
New Revision: 262343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262343=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier.
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> It might be reasonable for GCC to silently ignore attributes that use an
> unrecognized attribute-namespace. If somebody uses [[clang::foobar]] or
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 3 13:56:58 2018
New Revision: 262341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262341=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-03 Richard Biener
PR ipa/86389
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242
--- Comment #11 from c...@mnet-mail.de ---
Thanks for the fix!
On 07/03/2018 12:48 PM, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242
>
> Paul Thomas changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86390
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-7-3
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86390
Bug ID: 86390
Summary: ICE in output_branch, at config/sh/sh.c:2740 for
sh-linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška
d_sext_arg, @function
should_sext_arg:
addisp,sp,-32
sw ra,28(sp)
callmust_receive_sext_arg
lw ra,28(sp)
addisp,sp,32
jr ra
.size should_sext_arg, .-should_sext_arg
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can't approve that, I was just checking if this should be closed now (and
testing updates to a version=8.0.1 bug after Richi made some Bugzilla config
changes).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
My UBSAN bootstrap is broken by a recent commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00111.html
I'll try a bit older revision to see if I see also the debug info comparison
failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85960
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
Bug ID: 86389
Summary: execute FAILs with -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
Bug ID: 86388
Summary: Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march='
switch" suggestions alphabetically
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jul 3 11:22:24 2018
New Revision: 262340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262340=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove powerpc-linux_paired from config-list.mk
The target has been removed,
.align 2
.globl should_sext_arg
.type should_sext_arg, @function
should_sext_arg:
addisp,sp,-32
addisp,sp,32
jr ra
.size should_sext_arg, .-should_sext_arg
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
binary-trunk-262329-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84893
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018
New Revision: 262339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-03 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82969
PR fortran/86242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018
New Revision: 262339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-03 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82969
PR fortran/86242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to jwakely from comment #5)
> On 03/07/18 10:07 +, r...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> >--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> >Is this fixed now?
>
> Or do you plan to backport it?
I would like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84893
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We have a number of very similar bugs related to deducing function types from
function pointers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
--- Comment #5 from jwakely at redhat dot com ---
On 03/07/18 10:07 +, r...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
>Is this fixed now?
Or do you plan to backport it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jul 3 10:03:44 2018
New Revision: 262335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262335=gcc=rev
Log:
[16/n] PR85694: Add detection of averaging operations
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018
New Revision: 262331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-03 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82969
PR fortran/86242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018
New Revision: 262331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-03 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82969
PR fortran/86242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced slightly:
struct A {
int* a;
A(int a) : a(new int(a)) {}
~A() { delete a; }
A(const A&) = delete;
A(A&& other) { a = other.a; other.a = 0; };
operator bool() { return true; }
};
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 86381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86381
Bug ID: 86381
Summary: Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not
supported
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86384
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And please stop reporting bugs for 8.0.1 -- that's an unsupported pre-release
build that could be from any time between January and April.
Use 8.1.0 or trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385
Bug ID: 86385
Summary: calling wrong constructors?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86183
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 86384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
