https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
Bug ID: 87038
Summary: diagnostics: Please add warning for jumping over
initializers with switch/case in C mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Tue Aug 21 08:56:11 2018
New Revision: 263693
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263693=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-08-21 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/86121
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87037
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87037
Bug ID: 87037
Summary: vector :: erase return value should be marked "must
use"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87036
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
On 21.08.2018 09:53, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87036
>
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> For powerpc at least this is due to fma. Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87036
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86834
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87036
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
For powerpc at least this is due to fma. Use -ffp-contract=off to turn it off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87036
Bug ID: 87036
Summary: -O1/-O2 affects floating point precision on at least
i686 and ppc64el
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86987
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Lesser ---
Nice, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
[basic.scope.class] p2:
"A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context
and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S. No diagnostic is required
for a violation of this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nicolas Lesser from comment #2)
> Huh, interesting. TIL. Where's that rule in the standard? Because I can't
> find it in [class.mem]. Is it somewhere else or did I just overlook it?
C++98
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Lesser ---
Huh, interesting. TIL. Where's that rule in the standard? Because I can't find
it in [class.mem]. Is it somewhere else or did I just overlook it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
Bug ID: 87035
Summary: Can't shadow global const int with unnamed enum in
class
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo