[Bug target/67246] MIPS: lw (load word) is generated for byte bitfield, leading to unaligned access

2018-09-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67246 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jeff Hansen from comment #8) > Why would this be a bug in the kernel? > > Why is gcc trying to load a word or short when it's a 4-bit bitfield?? So > you're recommending that we add

[Bug c++/87185] ICE in prune_lambda_captures()

2018-09-01 Thread P at draigBrady dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185 --- Comment #1 from Pádraig Brady --- Created attachment 44646 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44646=edit ICE avoidance patch and test case

[Bug c++/87185] New: ICE in prune_lambda_captures()

2018-09-01 Thread P at draigBrady dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185 Bug ID: 87185 Summary: ICE in prune_lambda_captures() Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/86856] Format warnings building all-gcc

2018-09-01 Thread 10walls at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86856 --- Comment #13 from jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> --- Looks good from my end, thanks for the fixes.

[Bug target/67246] MIPS: lw (load word) is generated for byte bitfield, leading to unaligned access

2018-09-01 Thread sqrammi at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67246 Jeff Hansen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sqrammi at hotmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/87184] generic-match.c:55076:1: ICE: Segmentation fault

2018-09-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87184 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 44645 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44645=edit Preprocessed source We might be running out of memory.

[Bug tree-optimization/87184] New: generic-match.c:55076:1: ICE: Segmentation fault

2018-09-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87184 Bug ID: 87184 Summary: generic-match.c:55076:1: ICE: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/87178] Compilation failure when program contains multiple variables allocated in particular section, and at least one variable is C++17 "inline"

2018-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c/87183] -Wformat: format-extra-args fails to catch ex: printf(PRIu32, 1)

2018-09-01 Thread noah.pendleton at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87183 --- Comment #3 from Noah Pendleton --- Yep, looks like it, enabling `-Wsystem-headers` yields the expected result: ```bash gcc -Wall -Werror -Wsystem-headers test.c In file included from test.c:1: test.c: In function 'main': test.c:5:12: error:

[Bug c/87183] -Wformat: format-extra-args fails to catch ex: printf(PRIu32, 1)

2018-09-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87183 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe a dup of bug 68052, see comment #6

[Bug c/87183] -Wformat: format-extra-args fails to catch ex: printf(PRIu32, 1)

2018-09-01 Thread noah.pendleton at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87183 --- Comment #1 from Noah Pendleton --- Typo, the description should read- "Using format specifiers but omitting the `%` prefix causes the `-Werror=format-extra-args` error to not be **emitted**:" 

[Bug c/87183] New: -Wformat: format-extra-args fails to catch ex: printf(PRIu32, 1)

2018-09-01 Thread noah.pendleton at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87183 Bug ID: 87183 Summary: -Wformat: format-extra-args fails to catch ex: printf(PRIu32, 1) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87074] [8/9 Regression] Unroll and jam bug: O3 result differ from O2

2018-09-01 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87074 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/87074] [8/9 Regression] Unroll and jam bug: O3 result differ from O2

2018-09-01 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87074 --- Comment #6 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Sat Sep 1 17:33:45 2018 New Revision: 264030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264030=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR87074 Backport from mainline PR tree-optimization/87074

[Bug libstdc++/49836] [C++0x] vector::push_back() should not require T to be (move-)assignable

2018-09-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49836 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- Hi, I understand not using assignment when it isn't necessary. But we ended up with a stricter testcase using CopyConsOnlyType, where the type has a deleted move constructor which, as far as I understand the

[Bug tree-optimization/87074] [8/9 Regression] Unroll and jam bug: O3 result differ from O2

2018-09-01 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87074 --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Sat Sep 1 17:22:05 2018 New Revision: 264029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264029=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR87074 PR tree-optimization/87074 * gimple-loop-jam.c

[Bug libfortran/87182] New: libbacktrace does not use GCC own zlib

2018-09-01 Thread vigerske at math dot hu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87182 Bug ID: 87182 Summary: libbacktrace does not use GCC own zlib Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/77609] __attribute__((section(".note.foo"))) forces SHT_PROGBITS though the assembler would use SHT_NOTE

2018-09-01 Thread rauter.gabriel at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77609 Gabriel Rauter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rauter.gabriel at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/87171] -march=native doesn't detect flags correctly on G4560

2018-09-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87181] New: ICE with _Pragma push_macro

2018-09-01 Thread daniel at hebirobotics dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87181 Bug ID: 87181 Summary: ICE with _Pragma push_macro Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug preprocessor/69665] Internal error on #pragma push_macro("__FILE__")

2018-09-01 Thread daniel at hebirobotics dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665 Daniel Wright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel at hebirobotics dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/87176] [9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86-64-linux-gnu

2018-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87176 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87177] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu

2018-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87177 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87171] -march=native doesn't detect flags correctly on G4560

2018-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/87171] -march=native doesn't detect flags correctly on G4560

2018-09-01 Thread luz at mujerlibre dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Comment #2 from Angelica --- x86info v1.30. Dave Jones 2001-2011 Feedback to . MP Table: # APIC ID Version State Family Model StepFlags #0 0x15BSP, usable 6 14 9 0x0381 #

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

2018-09-01 Thread ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-09-01 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #17 from martin --- Thanks for fixing it! Using class(*) with gfortran is still a bit of a precarious ride.

[Bug c++/49531] Doesn't resolve to conversion function template specialization in expressions

2018-09-01 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49531 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com,

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 1 08:11:34 2018 New Revision: 264027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264027=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/86760

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 1 08:11:34 2018 New Revision: 264027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264027=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/86760

[Bug libgcc/86215] Exceptions are broken on OSX when linking with -static-libgcc

2018-09-01 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86215 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org