https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > Even for x86_64:
> > vmovdqa src(%rip), %xmm0
> > vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm1
> > vpsrldq $8, %xmm0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Even for x86_64:
> vmovdqa src(%rip), %xmm0
> vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm1
> vpsrldq $8, %xmm0, %xmm0
> vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742
Liu Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44894|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.3.0
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, it was working in GCC 7.3.x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-efi-2 pr87317]$ cat y.c
#define MAX 4
long long int dst[MAX];
short src[MAX];
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX; i++)
dst[i] = src[i];
}
[hjl@gnu-efi-2 pr87317]$
/export/ssd/build/tool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87744
Bug ID: 87744
Summary: Some valid instantiations of
linear_congruential_engine produce compiler errors
when __int128 isn't available
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87743
Bug ID: 87743
Summary: Vectorizer doesn't support conversion of different
sizes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742
Bug ID: 87742
Summary: False warning 'array
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Oct 24 22:34:40 2018
New Revision: 265474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Don't do make_more_copies for dest PC (PR87720)
Jumps are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87698
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87716
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(and swap xmm0 and xmm3 in all later instructions).
Yes. But it seems IRA doesn't figure this out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
-O0 is the default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> No, doesn't ring bells. But I have some more input:
>
> I couldn't get it to fail on powerpc64-linux.
> It fails on powerpc64le-linux only if the second fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87631
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI, missed-optimization
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87741
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@ after reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87741
Bug ID: 87741
Summary: Don't build readline/libreadline.a in GDB, when
--with-system-readline is supplied
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86288
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 24 19:39:23 2018
New Revision: 265470
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265470&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86288
* parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute): Canonic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
That's good you can reproduce that ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87740
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87740
Bug ID: 87740
Summary: Error Making Test Suite
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850
Bug 84850 depends on bug 84851, which changed state.
Bug 84851 Summary: missing -Wclass-memaccess for a memcpy in a copy ctor with a
non-trivial member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84851
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84851
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84851
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Oct 24 18:06:14 2018
New Revision: 265467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84851 - missing -Wclass-memaccess for a memcpy in a copy ctor with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87739
Bug ID: 87739
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84436-5.c fails with
its introduction in r265463
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87738
Bug ID: 87738
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:4920
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Reduced reproducer:
# define DBG_ERROR(dbg_logger, format, args...) if (1){\
char dbg_buffer[256]; \
__builtin_snprintf(dbg_buffer, sizeof(dbg_buffer)-1,\
__FILE__":%5d: " format , __LINE__ , ## args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Comment on attachment 44892
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44892
Patch for the PR
As for things to be done: I forgot the placeholder in simplify_const_ref and
the need for some modificat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87736
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87736
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note that you can have a custom malloc function (e.g. xmalloc) that pairs
with standard free, so it should be possible to indicate that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87737
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Configured with --enable-checking=yes :
$ gfortran-9-20181021-chk -c z1.f90 -O2
during IPA pass: inline
f951:
internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in
remap_gimple_op_r, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87737
Bug ID: 87737
Summary: ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in
remap_gimple_op_r, at tree-inline.c:923
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67760
--- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz ---
Works with an explicit result variable :
$ cat z2.f90
module m
implicit none
contains
function f() result(z)
integer :: z(4)
call s
contains
subroutine s
z = 42
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #11 from Douglas Mencken ---
I’m bisecting yet
CC="ccache /Developer/GCC/7.3p/PowerPC/32bit/bin/gcc" \
CXX="ccache /Developer/GCC/7.3p/PowerPC/32bit/bin/g++" \
../gcc-build/configure \
--build=powerpc-unknown-darwin --host=powerpc-un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67760
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #3 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #6 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
Logged Bug 87736 for new proposed attributes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87736
Bug ID: 87736
Summary: New attributes to mark custom alloc/free function pair
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
Hi Enrique,
Nobody is at their most productive while working in a filthy environment.
Bring the experts in to keep it clean!
We will ensure your space is always clean from top to bottom. Vanguard
Cleaning Systems has been the trusted cleaning partner of countless
companies across America for over
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87735
Bug ID: 87735
Summary: [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-1.c and
-2.c and -3.c fail starting with 265454
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #0)
> Valgrind also provides set of macros which allows it to track custom
> alloc/free functions. It would be nice if you add new attributes which could
> be atta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87732
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like a dup of PR 78104
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Does this qualify as a P2 bug? This is a serious degradation not only on P7
but also P8 and P9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
Bug ID: 87734
Summary: ICE in is_illegal_recursion check for character len=
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Paul,
How can the mode of dest be different from that of the source? How does PC
get into this? Could you show an example of bad / good RTL?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84436
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84436
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 24 13:52:21 2018
New Revision: 265463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Switch conversion: support any ax + b transformation (PR
tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Detect and eliminate|Detect and eliminate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15089
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
Kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733
Bug ID: 87733
Summary: local register variable not honored with earlyclobber
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87732
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
New warning for this also would be welcome.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87732
Bug ID: 87732
Summary: Detect and eliminate unnecessary alloc/free pairs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87731
Bug ID: 87731
Summary: Detection of mismatched alloc/free pairs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This means the following paradox compiles OK:
#if ! __has_include()
# include
#endif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87730
Bug ID: 87730
Summary: Warn about misuses of __has_include_next
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Bug ID: 87729
Summary: Please include -Woverloaded-virtual in -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87722
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86288
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang has now implemented this as a special case, only recognizing "__gnu__" as
a synonym for the "gnu" attribute-namespace. That's fine for libstdc++'s
purposes, as I don't expect we'll start using any oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
--- Comment #2 from Paul Hua ---
untested patch:
Index: gcc/combine.c
===
--- gcc/combine.c (revision 265456)
+++ gcc/combine.c (working copy)
@@ -14965,7 +14965,11 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 44890
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44890&action=edit
current overflow-2.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 44889
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44889&action=edit
previous overflow-2.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87728
Bug ID: 87728
Summary: inline asm not optimized on GIMPLE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
Bug ID: 87727
Summary: [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/overflow-2.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
I'm curious about:
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:
In function ‘void* __sanitizer::internal_start_thread(void (*)(void*), void*)’:
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87105
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 24 11:46:58 2018
New Revision: 265457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87105
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15089
Ilya Lesokhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilya.lesokhin at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87726
Bug ID: 87726
Summary: -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't work with lto
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87724
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #7 from Mihail Zenkov ---
http://www.knk.uwebweb.com/glibc-segfault-2.tar.xz
I put full command line into exit.cmd and vfscanf.cmd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87725
Bug ID: 87725
Summary: OpenMP 4.5 clause schedule(simd,monotonic:static) not
understood
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
This Week’s Fuel Prices
if you can’t see the image below you can find it here
(https://gfcmedia.com/medco/)
https://gfcmedia.com/medco/
Energetically Yours, MEDCO
To Stop Receiving our Emails, Please Reply with: REMOVE
( Some emails are scheduled in advanced, remove may take up some time )
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 24 09:42:19 2018
New Revision: 265455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265455&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87715
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Interesting, let me try to reproduce that. Note that using -O3 can't be
> problem as it's supposed to do only valid code transformations.
Indeed. O3 isn't the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87724
Bug ID: 87724
Summary: gcc allows narrowing conversions in converted constant
expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87723
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-10-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87723
Bug ID: 87723
Summary: ICE: output_operand: invalid %-code on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
P
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
