https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
One more similar back-trace:
$ gcc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/callabi/func-1.c
-Ofast -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues -mandroid -mavx512vpopcntdq
during RTL pass: reload
/home/mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928
Bug ID: 87928
Summary: ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at
config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The candidate patch regresses the regression test added along with the fix for
bug 49095. At first I thought it should, but there seems to be logic in place
to adjust the compare for the flags-clobbering i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81902
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
Bug 80998 depends on bug 81902, which changed state.
Bug 81902 Summary: new -fsanitize=pointer-overflow option undocumented
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81902
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42726
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 44970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44970&action=edit
candidate patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42726
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Thu Nov 8 03:37:32 2018
New Revision: 265906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-07 Sandra Loosemore
PR middle-end/42726
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80828
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@ after reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80828
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Thu Nov 8 01:26:28 2018
New Revision: 265903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-07 Sandra Loosemore
PR driver/80828
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44968|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 44968
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44968&action=edit
proposed patch
In default_print_patchable_function_entry, integer_asm_op is passed
POINTER_SIZE_UNITS. For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
Bug ID: 87927
Summary: ICE: segmentation fault with patchable_function_entry
attribute for msp430-elf -mlarge
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87926
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:50:20 2018
New Revision: 265899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265899&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR/87936] --disable-checking bootstrap break
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87926
Bug ID: 87926
Summary: bad array-index warning breaks --disable-checking
bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87925
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
--- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87925
Bug ID: 87925
Summary: Missed optimization: Single-value if-then-else chains
treated differently than switch'es
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87691
--- Comment #10 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:06:26 2018
New Revision: 265894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-07 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR c/87691
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87919
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The -fdec-structure part has been posted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-11/msg00029.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85982
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2018-05-31 00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87919
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #0)
> Rather than ICE'ing should there be some error message about object size
> being too large?
Yes. In any case, there should be no ICE whatever code you pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 78707, which changed state.
Bug 78707 Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_reload, at
reload.c:1349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78707
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78707
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.1.1, 8.0.1
--- Comment #3 from Geor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87922
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69348
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87924
Bug ID: 87924
Summary: OpenACC wait clauses without async-arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, patch
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87921
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87921
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442
--- Comment #9 from calixte ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Ok, I've got a patch prototype and I hope I'll be able to sent it before
> the end of this stage1.
>
> > The idea is to add two options to easily include/exclude some f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87923
Bug ID: 87923
Summary: ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87922
Bug ID: 87922
Summary: ICE in gfc_wide_strlen, at fortran/scanner.c:142
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #6 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87921
Bug ID: 87921
Summary: Incorrect error "storage size of [array] isn't known
(when it is)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87904
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87904
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 7 16:28:46 2018
New Revision: 265879
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265879&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR C++/87904] lookup ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Amelkin ---
Also happens with `gcc (Ubuntu 8.1.0-5ubuntu1~16.04) 8.1.0`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87913
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
A fix for the MIN/MAX recognition generates
f:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
testl %edi, %edi
movl$1, %eax
cmovne %edi, %eax
ret
it doesn't change g().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|9.0
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87914
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 7 15:01:09 2018
New Revision: 265876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87914
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 87914, which changed state.
Bug 87914 Summary: gcc fails to vectorize bitreverse code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87914
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
--- Comment #6 from Gary Mills ---
I'm still waiting for information on how to use gdb to check the alignment of
the structures involved in this ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87916
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87916
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87916
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87920
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87920
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87920
Bug ID: 87920
Summary: Lots of regression tests fail with bootstrap build of
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79775
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-01 00:00:00 |2018-11-7
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83243
Jüri Valdmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juri.valdmann at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87913
--- Comment #2 from krux ---
The case of function g is quite interesting because of the data dependencies
and adc's latency:
https://godbolt.org/z/0V8Dlx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66298
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
This would also help to detect the incorrect pragma placement in bug 63326:
int main()
{
int result = 1;
if (result < 0)
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-result"
return result;
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87919
Bug ID: 87919
Summary: Incorrect fortran handling of -fno-* options
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87868
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87868
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Nov 7 09:33:22 2018
New Revision: 265869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix UBSAN in postreload-gcse.c (PR rtl-optimization/87868).
2018-11-07 M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87915
--- Comment #2 from krux ---
Yeah I'm using -fopt-info for manual performance analysis but that can't be
enabled in the normal build as it's too noisy.
Furthermore a proper warning can be turned into an error to ensure that
developer expectations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87918
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-7
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87918
Bug ID: 87918
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in simplify_binary_operation, at
simplify-rtx.c:2153 since r264688
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, openmp
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87869
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> Created attachment 44963 [details]
> updated patch
>
> Updated patch. There are the expected missing warnings plus the two missed
> optimizations noted by t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87906
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 7 08:06:57 2018
New Revision: 265861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-07 Richard Biener
PR lto/87906
* tree-strea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87917
Bug ID: 87917
Summary: ICE in initialize_matrix_A at gcc/tree-data-ref.c:3150
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87901
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> The example is undefined -- it forms a past the-end pointer -- and
> -Warray-bounds detects it:
>
> warning: array subscript 2 is outside array bounds of ‘int[1]
79 matches
Mail list logo