[Bug fortran/87946] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_walk_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:10506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87946 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/87945] [9 Regression] ICE in var_element, at fortran/decl.c:281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87945 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/87943] [6.5 regression] severe regression on iso_varying_string (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87943 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87942] every int seems to be unaligned in packed structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87942 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/87941] by_pieces infra does not use movmisalign optab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87941 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87940] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/warn-strlen-no-nul.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87940 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/87954] VRP can transform a * b where a,b are [0,1] to a & b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87954 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87956] New: Gcc should emit deprecation warnings when using throw() in C++ >= 17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87956 Bug ID: 87956 Summary: Gcc should emit deprecation warnings when using throw() in C++ >= 17 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/87955] New: [9 Regression] ICE in cl_target_option_print_diff at gcc/options-save.c:3803 since r265920

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955 Bug ID: 87955 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in cl_target_option_print_diff at gcc/options-save.c:3803 since r265920 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/87955] [9 Regression] ICE in cl_target_option_print_diff at gcc/options-save.c:3803 since r265920

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- By the time shrink-wrapping is performed, which is after LRA (pass_thread_prologue_and_epilogue, to be precise), aren't all spilling decisions already made? Because if that's true, we have to be

[Bug rtl-optimization/86438] [8/9 Regression] wrong code at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 9 10:16:09 2018 New Revision: 265957 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265957=gcc=rev Log: [PR86438] compare-elim: cope with set of in_b When in_a resolves to a register

[Bug target/87793] [8/9 Regression] GCC reports error when compiling with "-fpic -Os -g"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87793 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 9 10:15:46 2018 New Revision: 265956 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265956=gcc=rev Log: [PR87793] reject non-toplevel unspecs in debug loc exprs on x86 Before revision

[Bug sanitizer/87892] [9 Regression]: libsanitizer fails to build on CentOS 5.11 (glibc 2.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87892 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 9 09:14:36 2018 New Revision: 265950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265950=gcc=rev Log: Fallback in libsanitizer for scudo sanitizer (PR sanitizer/87892). 2018-11-09

[Bug tree-optimization/87954] New: VRP can transform a * b where a,b are [0,1] to a & b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87954 Bug ID: 87954 Summary: VRP can transform a * b where a,b are [0,1] to a & b Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c/87953] asan: stack-buffer-overflow in vectorizable_reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87953 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/87931] [9 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6193 since r265876

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87931 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- My asan error looks different to me. See new bug report 87953.

[Bug c/87953] New: asan: stack-buffer-overflow in vectorizable_reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87953 Bug ID: 87953 Summary: asan: stack-buffer-overflow in vectorizable_reduction Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/87950] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch cases are completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87950 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > > Thank you Andrew for clarification of the behavior. Apparently it's quite > > common question. One note that I

[Bug c/87950] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch cases are completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87950 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Thank you Andrew for clarification of the behavior. Apparently it's quite > common question. One note that I have about C behavior is that we can maybe > also add

[Bug c++/87951] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch is completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- One more comment here. I do cooperate with our openSUSE maintainer of Chromium package and they have quite some of these warnings when building with GCC. I told him he can strengthen behavior with

[Bug c++/87951] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch is completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-11-9 CC|

[Bug c/87950] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch cases are completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87950 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/87269] [9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15475 starting from r261802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- I can still see it iceing: https://godbolt.org/z/tvHnzW Can you please also try the duplicate?

[Bug target/87928] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 Status|NEW

<    1   2