https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #1 from krux ---
Something like -march=armv8-a -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8 does not work either.
https://godbolt.org/z/MpBQ0I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
Bug ID: 88013
Summary: can't vectorize rgb to grayscale conversion code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #5 from krux ---
I meant -Wshadow=local.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-09-09 16:31:17 |2018-11-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to krux from comment #3)
> -Wshadow, at least the local variant, would indeed be really nice in -Wall
> or at least -Wextra. The global one is still too noisy because of class
> constructors: https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61651
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718
--- Comment #4 from Terry Guo ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> Following testcase:
>
> --cut here--
> typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size (8)));
>
> void foo (int x, int y)
> {
> register int a __asm ("xmm1");
> register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615
krux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hoganmeier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
krux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hoganmeier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Nov 14 02:17:35 2018
New Revision: 266097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/87507
* lower-subreg.c (operan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #5 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
I obviously meant that it makes it unusable in my use case when I can't
guarantee that the input is bounded by this (smallish) size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Vadim Zeitlin from comment #3)
> This makes std::regex simply unusable.
Yes, because there are no uses with inputs below 27KiB.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 14 00:02:35 2018
New Revision: 266093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87898
* omp-simd-clone.c (ipa_simd_mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87781
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Johannes Pfau from comment #9)
> Fix for the loadDR failure: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/767
Could you post that to gcc-patches?
Should probably get write after approval for yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86594
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
For some weird reason this got fixed by my r265734.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Nov 13 22:14:11 2018
New Revision: 266086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/87899
* lra-lives.c (start_livi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Testcase from 88012:
using Number = unsigned int;
template
struct S {
S() {
const Number x = {-1};
(void)x;
}
};
int main()
{
S<1> s;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88012
Bug ID: 88012
Summary: Expected -Wnarrowing not given inside template class
method
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81454
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #9 from Johannes Pfau ---
Fix for the loadDR failure: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/767
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68836
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Thanks.
Hmm, tricky. There's no inlining, and debug info is as complete as one could
get. The problem is that the registers holding the variables are
call-clobbered, and the variables are dead after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87011
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I'm afraid I didn't investigate to tell whether problems were fixed or latent,
I just observed that the test passed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 13 19:57:51 2018
New Revision: 266084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/81824 - Warn for missing attributes with function aliases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45001
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45001&action=edit
gcc9-pr86739-2.patch
Variant patch if the conversion operator would not be acceptable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45000
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45000&action=edit
gcc9-pr86739.patch
This works for me (well, make in gcc/ with recent gcc still builds and the
preprocessed sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Bug ID: 88011
Summary: [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #1 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Bug ID: 88010
Summary: noinline function alias unexpectedly inlined
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009
Bug ID: 88009
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in find_intrinsic_vtab, at
fortran/class.c:2761
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87870
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88008
Bug ID: 88008
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in check_typebound_baseobject, at
fortran/resolve.c:6058
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Sure ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79440
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #3 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87932
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88000
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 16:14:37 2018
New Revision: 266081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86991
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Bug ID: 88007
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in gt_ggc_m_S, at ggc-page.c:1474
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: GC, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87552
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:59:57 2018
New Revision: 266079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE with -fopt-info-inline (PR ipa/87955)
PR ipa/87955 reports a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-11-13 10:21 a.m., skrll at netbsd dot org wrote:
> yes, it does.
So, the bug should be closed.
Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
--- Comment #2 from Nick Hudson ---
yes, it does.
Nick
nick@zoom:~/gcc$ ./inst/bin/hppa--linux-gcc -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
-S -o pdc.s pdc.i
nick@zoom:~/gcc$ cat pdc.s
.LEVEL 1.1
.text
.align 4
.globl pdc_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:06:54 2018
New Revision: 266074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improve -fprofile-report.
2018-11-13 Martin Liska
PR tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87931
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:07:53 2018
New Revision: 266075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87930
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87930
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:03:58 2018
New Revision: 266073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow -mabi=ms and -fsanitize={,kernel-}address (PR sanitizer/87930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88002
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I really have no intention of running the libbacktrace tests under DejaGNU.
But if someone wants to copy the .sum file generation out of libgo (which also
does not use DejaGNU), that would be fine with me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006
Bug ID: 88006
Summary: -fdebug-types-section gives undefined reference
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: deb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I'd rather not put this hack on trunk. Iff then a very limited scope
TREE_DIE (same cases as the hack) should be brought in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hppa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87962
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:51:34 2018
New Revision: 266071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87962
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:50:18 2018
New Revision: 266070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87967
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87993 and pr87994.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87881/pr87945/pr87994.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87881/pr87945/pr87993.
> Changed between 20181028 and 20181104 (ICE).
Parameter inquiry has been introduced at revision r265729: before it gave the
error
Error: Unexpected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the reason in the end is failure to tear down a half-built reduction chain.
I have a fix (finally).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87991
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87992
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Bug ID: 88005
Summary: [6/7/8/9] Regression GCC on hppa misoptimisation
function pointer call
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. in simplify-rtx.c we have:
case SIGN_EXTRACT:
case ZERO_EXTRACT:
if (CONST_INT_P (op0)
&& CONST_INT_P (op1)
&& CONST_INT_P (op2)
&& is_a (mode, &int_mode)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 44996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44996&action=edit
Callgraph dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
Bug ID: 88004
Summary: [9 Regression] lto1: error: node differs from
node->decl->decl_with_vis.symtab_node
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks, I will give it a try. Note that the numbers I posted are from trunk
and trunk with abstract origin streaming disabled. Thanks to the type
streaming reorg we do not have overall regression relative to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> No, it's different. We somehow fail to make a 2nd PHI in the vectorization
> of the inner loop.
Err, wrong bug.
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (from_phi)
prephitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88003
Bug ID: 88003
Summary: ICE on outside definition of inner function-local
class in poplevel_class, at cp/name-lookup.c:4325
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88002
Bug ID: 88002
Summary: libbacktrace and libiberty tests don't use dejagnu
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
