https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jm.feuggelen at orange dot fr
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #3)
> Updated output I had executed from STL with clear candidate suggestions:
>
> $ g++ -Wall -o stl_string stl_string.cpp
> stl_string.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88518
Bug ID: 88518
Summary: Function call defeats -Wuninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87944
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Dec 16 03:33:05 2018
New Revision: 267184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267184=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/87944
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88517
--- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt ---
> clang++ x.cpp -Wall && ./a.out
42
> clang++ -v
clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335528)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88517
Bug ID: 88517
Summary: Virtual-base class class constructor with for-loop
with initializer list referencing local variable not
executed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88138
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88138
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Dec 15 23:57:03 2018
New Revision: 267180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267180=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88138
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88516
--- Comment #2 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
Created attachment 45243
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45243=edit
preprocessed file
Oh I just noticed that the preprocessed file didn't get attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88482
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 15 23:51:31 2018
New Revision: 267179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267179=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/88482
* except.c (verify_library_fn): New function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88516
--- Comment #1 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
I'm afraid this is as minimal as it gets. Should I set up a git repo with all
sources needed to reproduce the error?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88514
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88516
Bug ID: 88516
Summary: Internal LTO error when linking against static libSFML
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88138
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Dec 15 23:30:50 2018
New Revision: 267178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267178=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88138
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
Hi Marc
I agree to useful to have the option to keep on for regular code.
Perhaps a way just to turn off all expansive output for STL's std namespace?
The easiest would be to remove cxx11 namespace from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88138
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Dec 15 22:53:26 2018
New Revision: 267177
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267177=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-15 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88138
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
As someone who regularly has to debug complicated template code, I think all
the information printed by g++ here is useful. There may be more compact ways
of giving the same information (use a shorthand for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88514
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88515
Bug ID: 88515
Summary: [concepts] id-expression that names non-static data
member rejected in requires-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88513
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88514
Bug ID: 88514
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-pr79299-1.c (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88513
Bug ID: 88513
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr59591-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Grant ---
MSVC 19 isn't much better
(7): error C2664:
'std::_String_iterator>>
std::basic_string,std::allocator<_Ty>>::erase(const
std::_String_const_iterator>>,const
std::_String_const_iterator>>)':
cannot convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512
Bug ID: 88512
Summary: Too much STL in error output
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88509
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I must say I don't understand your suggestion. bar is not a pointer and its
> address is non-NULL no matter whether it has been already initialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88511
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Soliday ---
One of the respondents in Stack overflow posted this reduced version of my code
that also reproduces the segmentation fault.
program main
implicit none
character(:), allocatable :: txt
call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88511
Bug ID: 88511
Summary: passing allocatable character through two levels of
procedure calls fails
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88502
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
I think flag_unsafe_math_optimizations is generally appropriate for these;
asinh needs flag_finite_math_only as well (because an Inf argument would result
in Inf / Inf) but neither of the others should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Dec 15 12:07:42 2018
New Revision: 267172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267172=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-12-14 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Dec 15 12:05:08 2018
New Revision: 267171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267171=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-12-14 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 88464, which changed state.
Bug 88464 Summary: AVX-512 vectorization of masked scatter failing with "not
suitable for scatter store"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 15 11:04:41 2018
New Revision: 267170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267170=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88464
PR target/88498
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 15 11:04:41 2018
New Revision: 267170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267170=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88464
PR target/88498
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 15 11:02:28 2018
New Revision: 267169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267169=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88464
PR target/88498
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 15 11:02:28 2018
New Revision: 267169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267169=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88464
PR target/88498
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88502
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #0)
> GCC should support inline code generation for asinh, acosh, atanh functions,
> under appropriate fast-math conditions.
>
> glibc's bits/mathinline.h, for 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88509
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Dec 15 09:07:38 2018
New Revision: 267165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267165=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-12-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84644
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > (In reply to René J.V. Bertin from comment #4)
> > > Any news on this front?
> >
> > Last I heard from Iain he was
47 matches
Mail list logo
