[Bug rtl-optimization/87273] [8/9 Regression] ICE in merge_fences, at sel-sched-ir.c:708

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87273 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug c/88566] -Wconversion not using value range information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88566 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is a non flow sensitive warning. There are a bunch were are not; flow sensitivity would make this warning worse not better in my mind as it means in inlining would cause correct warnings to disappear.

[Bug middle-end/53917] Wuninitialized warning points to place where variable doesn't occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53917 pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/18395] [meta-bug] combine needs to be templatized like a peepholer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18395 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/16798] PowerPC - Opportunity to use recording form instruction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16798 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- This is the same problem as PR88233.

[Bug c/88566] -Wconversion not using value range information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88566 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug bootstrap/87030] GCC fails to build with Xcode 10, attempting an impossible multilib build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13) > (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #12) > > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #11) > > > (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia f

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 --- Comment #22 from Eric Gallager

[Bug target/25893] cris-linux: various libgomp tests fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25893 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|meta-bug| Summary|[meta-bug] cris-linu

[Bug c/88566] -Wconversion not using value range information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88566 --- Comment #1 from krux --- Even simpler example: uint8_t foo(uint8_t pin) { return pin > 0 ? pin - 1 : 0; }

[Bug middle-end/24222] [meta-bug] The gimplifier shouldn't emit warnings or errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24222 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > I found some other ones which had been added after this bug report was open > :(. Well at least there's only 1 of them left open

[Bug rtl-optimization/18395] [meta-bug] combine needs to be templatized like a peepholer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18395 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|16798, 26190, 16458 | Depends on|

[Bug c/88566] New: -Wconversion not using value range information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88566 Bug ID: 88566 Summary: -Wconversion not using value range information Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/18446] We need to distinguish value extension and value truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18446 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|meta-bug| Summary|[meta-bug] We need t

[Bug middle-end/53917] Wuninitialized warning points to place where variable doesn't occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53917 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/88546] Copy attribute unusable for weakrefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88546 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/88196] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88196 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88196] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88196 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Dec 21 03:34:06 2018 New Revision: 267319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267319&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88196 - ICE with class non-type template parameter.

[Bug lto/71959] [OpenACC] lto1: ICE in inline_read_section, at ipa-fnsummary.c:3314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71959 jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 87471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/87471] AVX512F gather in Intel syntax is incompatible with binutils 2.32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87471 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/87549] Optimize fetch atomics with unused results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87549 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/85471] closing a "thread" in "C++" using "pthread_exit(NULL)" creates a "SIGABRT"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85471 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andreas Otto from comment #4) > change my C++ wrapper from "embedded data" (large amount of data) to just an > embedded pointer (only 8byte pointer in the C++ class) > > → the error is still ther

[Bug target/87471] AVX512F gather in Intel syntax is incompatible with binutils 2.32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87471 --- Comment #1 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- Yeah, and as validly noted in bug 79299 comment 2, it shouldn't have been gcc to get fixed back then, but gas. Without having looked, I assume gcc emitted size specifiers in line with the AVX gath

[Bug target/85095] [6/7 Regression] worse code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/85172] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '' of kind asm_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84980] [concepts] ICE with missing typename in concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84961] [7 Regression] ICE error: SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84853] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84999] [7 Regression] ICE in make_vector_type, at tree.c:9561

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83403] Missed register promotion opportunities in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 --- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Is there please any update? I can work on it early next week. Ping me if I don't do it by the end of next week.

[Bug target/88457] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88457 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69121] IEEE_SCALB is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-12/msg00126.html

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 51628, which changed state. Bug 51628 Summary: __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases (i.e. add -Waddress-of-packed-member, etc.) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 What|Removed

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases (i.e. add -Waddress-of-packed-member, etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases (i.e. add -Waddress-of-packed-member, etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #54 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Dec 20 21:41:48 2018 New Revision: 267313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267313&root=gcc&view=rev Log: C/C++: Add -Waddress-of-packed-member When address of packed memb

[Bug middle-end/83239] False positive from -Wstringop-overflow on simple std::vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239 --- Comment #25 from Tony E Lewis --- Yep - my original testcase now compiles without complaint on the trunk GCC on Godbolt. Thanks very much to everyone involved.

[Bug target/88556] Inline built-in sinh, cosh, tanh for -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88556 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- For any vaguely recent GCC version, the now-removed code in bits/mathinline.h used __builtin_expm1l. The key features for this (and much the same applies to the hypot / asinh / acosh / ata

[Bug fortran/69121] IEEE_SCALB is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Assignee|unassign

[Bug middle-end/88487] union prevents autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88487 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Not good. Fortunately I found workaround. This is probably the best what one can get: [code] #include #include template struct TypeHelper { constexpr unsigned offset(); operator Type&() {

[Bug target/86891] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86891 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88316] numerous big-endian issues with compatibility implementations of vector intrinsics for powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88316 pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88565] New: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 Bug ID: 88565 Summary: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/88408] [9 regression] r266868 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88408 --- Comment #5 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Thu Dec 20 18:22:24 2018 New Revision: 267309 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267309&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Paul Clarke [gcc] Backport from trunk

[Bug target/83315] PowerPC xmmintrin.h emulation for _mm_{min,max}_ps not semantically equivalent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83315 --- Comment #4 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Thu Dec 20 18:22:24 2018 New Revision: 267309 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267309&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Paul Clarke [gcc] Backport from trunk

[Bug target/88316] numerous big-endian issues with compatibility implementations of vector intrinsics for powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88316 --- Comment #6 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Thu Dec 20 18:22:24 2018 New Revision: 267309 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267309&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Paul Clarke [gcc] Backport from trunk

[Bug target/88457] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88457 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Dec 20 18:07:51 2018 New Revision: 267307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267307&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Vladimir Makarov PR target/88457 * ir

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- The original problem doesn't fail for me also if I use a glibc >= 2.19 (I used 2.28).

[Bug target/86891] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86891 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- The abort goes away after r266897. It might have just gone latent, however.

[Bug c++/88261] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/88180] [7/8 Regression] ICE in vec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88180 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/88180] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in vec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88180 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 20 17:34:19 2018 New Revision: 267306 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267306&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88180 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_specifier_1): If

[Bug rtl-optimization/88563] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/88563] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/88547] missed optimization for vector comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88547 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45274 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45274&action=edit gcc9-pr88547.patch Untested patch for the rest. Richard, is that what you had in mind?

[Bug tree-optimization/84051] [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I see GCC warns for this case with -Warray-bounds=2 and it's being tested in gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-11.c. I think it would make sense to warn on the pointer to array case even at level 1. It seems quite unlike

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|9.0 | Summary|[7/8 Regression] miss

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 20 16:25:13 2018 New Revision: 267302 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267302&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84053 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local arra

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 84053, which changed state. Bug 84053 Summary: [7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 What|Rem

[Bug c++/88564] expected primary-expression error with operator= invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564 --- Comment #3 from J-Donald Tournier --- (In reply to J-Donald Tournier from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Works for me with GCC 8.2.0 and tip of branch as well as GCC 9. It might > > have been an intermittent f

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- It was fixed in r262893 but none of the tests verifies that it works. Let me add one.

[Bug lto/85574] [9 Regression] LTO bootstapped binaries differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- To answer myself, no, doing LTO bootstrap twice doesn't get you stage-by-stage equal binaries. Looking at WPA IPA inline dumps (only have them from one build) obviously shows address differences (stage1 and

[Bug c++/88196] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88196 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/83443] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings, line 119)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, that's what I'm thinking. Thanks for confirming that!

[Bug target/83443] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings, line 119)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Both compilers targets are 32-bits. But the native one is built on a 32-bits host (arm), while my cross-compilers are built on x86_64 64-bits hosts. Could that make a difference?

[Bug target/83443] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings, line 119)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Is the difference between the native compiler and the cross that the former is 32-bit and the latter 64-bit? If that's I might be able to reproduce it with a 32-bit i386 cross. Let me check the warning code

[Bug c++/88564] expected primary-expression error with operator= invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564 --- Comment #2 from J-Donald Tournier --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Works for me with GCC 8.2.0 and tip of branch as well as GCC 9. It might > have been an intermittent failure but I only was able to check x86_64-linux. Whe

[Bug c++/88564] expected primary-expression error with operator= invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||MinGW64 --- Comment #1 from Richard Bie

[Bug target/88316] numerous big-endian issues with compatibility implementations of vector intrinsics for powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88316 --- Comment #5 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Thu Dec 20 15:25:15 2018 New Revision: 267301 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267301&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Paul Clarke [gcc] Backport from trunk

[Bug target/88408] [9 regression] r266868 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88408 --- Comment #4 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Thu Dec 20 15:25:15 2018 New Revision: 267301 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267301&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-20 Paul Clarke [gcc] Backport from trunk

[Bug rtl-optimization/15482] can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' while reloading `asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15482 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/88559] error: Stack Pointer register clobbered by '%rsp' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88559 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dinuxbg at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/85396] _M_t._M_emplace_hint_unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85396 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82258] [8/9 regression] allocate_zerosize_3.f fails since r251949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug target/82162] Internal compiler error in Raspbian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82162 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82034] SMMLAR pattern not detected on ARMv7-M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82034 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/88561] [8/9 Regression] PGO devirtualization miscompilation of firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88561 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 45273 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45273&action=edit Fix I am testing

[Bug c++/87935] [9 regression] new failures on arm since r265788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87935 Sam Tebbs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/88564] New: expected primary-expression error with operator= invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564 Bug ID: 88564 Summary: expected primary-expression error with operator= invocation Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/86020] [8/9 Regression] Performance regression in Eigen geometry.cpp test starting with r248334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86020 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/79784] Synchronization overhead is thrashing on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug rtl-optimization/78932] [ARM] -O2 generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78932 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78233] compute_idf fails quick_push size check when compiling libgcc for Debian armel with qemu-arm-static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78233 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77996] Miscompilation due to LTO on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77662] arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cgcc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77662 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70223] [ARM] Optimization level -O2 results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70223 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70030] [LRA]ICE when reload insn with output scratch operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030 --- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw --- Did the need for this patch go away?

[Bug c++/87504] inconsistent diagnostic style between C and C++ for binary operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87504 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Dec 20 14:18:48 2018 New Revision: 267299 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267299&root=gcc&view=rev Log: -Wtautological-compare: fix comparison of macro expansions gcc/c-famil

[Bug target/68494] [ARM] Use vector multiply by lane

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68494 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Richard Earns

[Bug ipa/88214] ICE in bitmap_intersect_p() on 32-bit BE platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88214 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Dec 20 14:14:22 2018 New Revision: 267298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267298&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR 88214] Assert that ptr is a pointer 2018-12-20 Martin Jambor

[Bug sanitizer/68100] runtime segfault ARM boost::regex_replace -fsanitize=undefined member access within misaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68100 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/54398] Incorrect ARM assembly when building with -fno-omit-frame-pointer -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess it would be nice to add the testcase into the testsuite in that case.

[Bug target/65325] float/interger operation needs cast with 02 switch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/58490] __sync_bool_compare_and_swap sign bit failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57911] alignment of arrays allocated stack on ARM : 4 bytes ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57911 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/56115] Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >