https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #0)
> > Branching out via END=, ERR= or EOR= specifier in combination with
> > CONTINUE is interpreted as a labeled DO lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Related testcase that should also be rejected:
struct S {
friend auto bar() -> decltype(this);
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88574
Bug ID: 88574
Summary: -Wmissing-attributes vs -Wattribute-alias=2 wrong for
noreturn
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
Making -Wattribute-alias a synonym for -Wattribute-alias=1 makes sense. I'll
take care of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88573
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 45281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45281&action=edit
test case (unminimized)
gcc-9 -O2 -S -flto arch/x86/events/intel/pt.i
/home/ak/lsrc/linux/arch/x86/events/intel/pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88573
Bug ID: 88573
Summary: 9 regression: error: type mismatch in component
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning in GCC 8 isn't bogus, it just reports the wrong number of bytes (it
counts characters, not bytes). That the warning is no longer issued is a
regression caused by c_strlen() giving up when the size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87759
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88169
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564
J-Donald Tournier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Dec 21 21:09:17 2018
New Revision: 267343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/69121
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
--- Comment #47 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 21 20:58:59 2018
New Revision: 267342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87359
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88570
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
I have checked svn head version (20181221), issue is still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88571
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
I have checked svn head version (20181221), issue is still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] std::less |[8 Regression] std::less
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86524
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:58:36 2018
New Revision: 267341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86524
PR c++/88446
* cp-tree.h (cp_fold_may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:58:36 2018
New Revision: 267341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86524
PR c++/88446
* cp-tree.h (cp_fold_may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88419
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |
--- Comment #6 from Casey Carter ---
Cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88553
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk, will backport at some point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85594
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:17:13 2018
New Revision: 267339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85594
PR middle-end/88553
* omp-expa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88553
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:17:13 2018
New Revision: 267339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85594
PR middle-end/88553
* omp-expa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
return true;;
should be
return true;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88561
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:13:06 2018
New Revision: 267338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/88561
* ipa-polymorphic-call.c
(ipa_polymo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 21 19:09:42 2018
New Revision: 267337
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267337&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87881
* expr.c (find_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88570
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
In g++ (GCC-Explorer-Build) 9.0.0 20181219 (experimental) this still exists.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88571
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
Yes. Issue still exists in g++ (GCC-Explorer-Build) 9.0.0 20181219
(experimental).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88418
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88418
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 21 18:11:04 2018
New Revision: 267332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-12-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88572
Bug ID: 88572
Summary: error: braces around scalar initializer - should be a
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88418
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 21 18:04:35 2018
New Revision: 267331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-12-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88569
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Component|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> Created attachment 45278 [details]
> patch for the ICF issue
>
> Conveniently the congruence_classes have a UID. So the attached sorts after
> that before t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88571
Bug ID: 88571
Summary: AVX512: when calculating logical expression with all
values in kN registers, do not use GPRs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #58 from Christophe Lyon ---
No, I haven't reproduced it manually yet. The log only says:
Execution returned 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88570
Bug ID: 88570
Summary: Missing or ineffective vectorization of scatter load
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #57 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #56)
> The updated testcase pr51628-10 fails at execution on aarch64
> FAIL: c-c++-common/pr51628-10.c -Wc++-compat execution test
Do you know why it fails?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Dec 21 16:09:23 2018
New Revision: 267328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87727
* combine.c (cant_combine_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 16:01:53 2018
New Revision: 267327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88522
* config/i386/sse.md (*avx512pf_gatherpfsf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 15:54:55 2018
New Revision: 267326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88563
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_2) :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88569
Bug ID: 88569
Summary: Track relations between variable values
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568
Bug ID: 88568
Summary: GCC cannot dllimport variables with undefined types
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Enforced as novelty, yes, but it was my understanding all the time?
Why? In Ada, the type declared in the source code is volatile so the TYPE_DECL
points to it. That's necessary for correct debug info I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #11 from Bence Szabó ---
Created attachment 45279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45279&action=edit
preprocessed c-parser, gimplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #10 from Bence Szabó ---
cc1:
segfault at vmovaps
2776 declspecs_add_type (loc, specs, t);
0045952e: ...kahead_kind)+1070 mov %rbp,%r8
00459531: ...kahead_kind)+1073 vmovdqa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Those ten mails all seem to be old ones that were stuck in some queue for
months.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88556
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 21 13:30:58 2018
New Revision: 267325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267325&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88556
* internal-fn.def (COSH): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
I've been puzzled if we have established a rule about this case. I personally
would consider this as a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Frédéric, any idea why your comment above caused Bugzilla to send the next ten
emails with your name on? See the mails between 23:17 and 23:14 at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2018-12/index.html#02713
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And also preprocessed c-parser.ii and/or gimplify.ii + full command line
options when they are built with stage1 compiler, so that somebody can inspect
that with a cross-compiler.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes. A regression in the sense that we didn't ICE before and now we do.
In any case, we really should fix this for GCC9, having a new feature that one
can safely use only with -g0 is not very nice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87787
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Summary|[9 Regression][U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87863
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
But how's it a regression then... from rejected to ice-on-valid?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87863
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88380
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88567
Bug ID: 88567
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in get_initial_defs_for_reduction
when building 521.wrf_r on AArch64 SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87545
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> HJ? Otherwise I'll simply make this change.
Yes, please. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo