https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714
Bug ID: 88714
Summary: [9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on armv7l
since r265398
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88715
Bug ID: 88715
Summary: Cross Compile on Debian Linux to create a uClibc tool
chain GCC fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
--- Comment #11 from Antony Polukhin ---
Looks good.
Note that boost::variant went further: if all the types are nothrow movable
then variant always does the trick with moving from temporary. In that way
`valueless_by_exception()` like states ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jan 6 10:25:46 2019
New Revision: 267608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267608&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/88363
* c-c++-common/attributes-4.c (falloc_align_int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
--- Comment #15 from Murat Tekeev ---
I downloaded the current version of Cygwin and reinstalled it all again
(previously removing everything that was installed).
On a 64-bit version of Cygwin and now everything runs fine with gfortran
7.4.0-1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
--- Comment #17 from Murat Tekeev ---
Thank you very much, Thomas!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88712
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88716
Bug ID: 88716
Summary: Improved diagnostics: No detection of conflicting
function definitions in some cases.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yeah that unconditional move might actually be more expensive than just
constructing directly. E.g. if the move constructor isn't really cheap, or if
it will memcpy a large object. If an exception is rare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88716
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
--- Comment #13 from Antony Polukhin ---
Yeah... but some whitelist of types to move could be hardcoded. For example
std::basic_string, std::vector, std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr could be
safely moved and `valueless_by_exception()` never ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88658
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 6 12:48:58 2019
New Revision: 267609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/88658
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88658
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88584
--- Comment #7 from Anders Granlund ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> This looks like a case that was missed in, or broken by, my fix for bug
> 13801, which was supposed to address such cases of entities with different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66229
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Warnings from comment #8 are fixed now. I would love to know if there are any
issues with what GCC 9 outputs. We still can't track locations to the original
.o files though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85433
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87525
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|infinite loop generated for |[7/8/9 Regression] infinite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 88713, which changed state.
Bug 88713 Summary: _gfortran_internal_pack@PLT prevents vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88606
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88606
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: verify_type failed |[9 Regression] ICE:
|(er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88717
Bug ID: 88717
Summary: Unnecessary vzeroupper
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88718
Bug ID: 88718
Summary: Strange inconsistency between old style and new style
declarations of iinline functions.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88694
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88719
Bug ID: 88719
Summary: [9 Regression] wrong code at -O2, -O3, and -Os on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86517
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 6 15:51:45 2019
New Revision: 267610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267610&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/86517
PR lto/88185
* lto-opts.c (lto_writ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88185
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 6 15:51:45 2019
New Revision: 267610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267610&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/86517
PR lto/88185
* lto-opts.c (lto_write
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88185
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88720
Bug ID: 88720
Summary: Strange error message about nested function declared
but not defined when using inline.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I get only 2 now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> A related test case, also changed between 20180909 and 20180916 :
Confirmed at r264350, not fixed by the patch in comment 2, but by the patch in
comment 3.
Janus, could please you figure out why cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Testsuite ICEs with -flto |[9 Regression] Testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
Bug ID: 88721
Summary: [9 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings in
sparc.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 45354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45354&action=edit
Possible patch
This patch allowed the bootstrap to finish.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86020
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 6 17:16:00 2019
New Revision: 267612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267612&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-opt/86020
Revert:
2017-05-22 Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86020
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
I spent good part of day today trying to recollect what was motivation for the
change. All i can think of is that it was mistaken micro-optimization as
mentioned in the mail I sent about reverting the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88722
Bug ID: 88722
Summary: :1: internal compiler error: in
register_moduleinfo, at d/modules.cc:40 2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
Bug ID: 88723
Summary: [9 regression] PR debug/88635 patch breaks
testsuite_shared.cc compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88724
Bug ID: 88724
Summary: FAIL: gdc.dg/compilable.d -O0 (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't have access to Solaris, can you attach preprocessed testsuite_shared.cc
+ the g++ options used to compile it?
The note generally shouldn't break stuff, it isn't an error, just a debugging
hint (goes a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 45355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45355&action=edit
preprocessed input
Sure. The cc1plus invocation is
cc1plus -fpreprocessed testsuite_shared.ii -quiet -dumpbase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #6 from Chris Elrod ---
Created attachment 45356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45356&action=edit
Code to demonstrate that transposing makes things slower.
Thomas Koenig, I am well aware that Fortran is column m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #7 from Chris Elrod ---
Created attachment 45357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45357&action=edit
Assembly generated by Flang compiler on the original version of the code.
This is the main loop body in the Flang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88725
Bug ID: 88725
Summary: fails to deduce template specialization in friend
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88726
Bug ID: 88726
Summary: GCC thinks that translation unit does not contain a
definition of inline function.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #8 from Chris Elrod ---
Created attachment 45358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45358&action=edit
gfortran compiled assembly for the tranposed version of the original code.
Here is the assembly for the loop body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hm.
It would help if your benchmark was complete, so I could run it.
However, what happens if you put int
real, dimension(:) :: Uix
real, dimension(:), intent(in) :: x
real, dime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80354
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #10 from Chris Elrod ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> Hm.
>
> It would help if your benchmark was complete, so I could run it.
>
I don't suppose you happen to have and be familiar with Julia? If you (or
someone els
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88130
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 6 20:11:15 2019
New Revision: 267613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267613&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2019-01-02 Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88130
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45359&action=edit
gcc9-pr88723.patch
Actually, UNSPEC_MOVE_GOTDATA always has non-constant arguments, such UNSPECs
we would never
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Jan 6 20:52:34 2019
New Revision: 267614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87431 fix regression introduced by r264574
The previous pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88727
Bug ID: 88727
Summary: Diagnostics improvement: Detection of undefined
behaviour. Incomplete type in tenative definition with
internal linkage.
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Ryan R Haining changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Ryan R Haining changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65799
Ryan R Haining changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
--- Comment #4 from Ryan R Haining ---
still a problem on head: https://wandbox.org/permlink/tPYbCp1jWYmc9O9J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68423
Ryan R Haining changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68423
Ryan R Haining changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Ryan R Hain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Jan 6 22:34:37 2019
New Revision: 267616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86756 Move rest of std::filesystem to libstdc++.so
Move std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Jan 6 22:34:29 2019
New Revision: 267615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86756 add std::filesystem::path to libstdc++.so
Move the C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65799
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.2.0 |4.9.2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88716
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This patch also fixed PR 87651 and PR 87652 which are also regressions on
gcc-8-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #23 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 88713, which changed state.
Bug 88713 Summary: Vectorized code slow vs. flang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729
Bug ID: 88729
Summary: ICE in libiberty during bootstrap with debug info
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
Bug ID: 88728
Summary: Boostrap with -Og fails with garbled file
libgcov-profiler.i
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45361&action=edit
config log
Here's the config.log from the configure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45362&action=edit
config.status
And here is the config.log.
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729 , which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88719
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88715
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84436
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #12 from Chris Elrod ---
Created attachment 45363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45363&action=edit
Fortran program for running benchmarks.
Okay, thank you.
I attached a Fortran program you can run to benchmark
ix
gcc version 9.0.0 20190106 (experimental) [trunk revision 267609] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -g abc.c outer.c
$ gdb-trunk -x cmds -batch a.out
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400507: file abc.c, line 11.
0
Breakpoint 1, main () at abc.c:11
11optimize_me_not();
$1 = 5
$ gcc-trunk -g -Og abc.c outer.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88730
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
It appears to be a regression in 8.X.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Bug ID: 88731
Summary: Rejects well-formed program using bit-fields in
_Generic.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #14 from Chris Elrod ---
It's not really reproducible across runs:
$ time ./gfortvectests
Transpose benchmark completed in 22.7010765
SIMD benchmark completed in 1.37529969
All are equal: F
All are approximately equa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is a TC rather than a DR which means it is not part of C11 but the next one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66229
--- Comment #4 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
Did some testing. Previously pretty much everything I tried failed.
I don't have mcf, but git, less, gcc LTO+autofdo bootstrap all appear to work
now.
So it's likely fixed.
Would be good if some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88715
--- Comment #2 from tomsies at mighty dot co.za ---
Actually binutils-2.29 (along with gmp-6.1.0, mpc-1.0.3 and mpfr-3.1.4) are
symlinked into the gcc source tree. So they should be built as part of the
compile.
My assumption is that the as scrip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88715
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the full log? And also attach config.log in the top level
directory?
> Actually binutils-2.29 ... are symlinked into the gcc source tree.
How did you do the symlink here? Is it a symlink ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88732
Bug ID: 88732
Summary: different results on -O0 and -O1, -O2, -O3, -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
