https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88739
--- Comment #52 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 28 08:15:42 2019
New Revision: 268332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88739
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89085
Bug ID: 89085
Summary: call of overload is ambiguous with parameter packs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89086
Bug ID: 89086
Summary: Add a Fortran language reference chapter
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89064
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 28 09:07:30 2019
New Revision: 268333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-28 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/89064
PR tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86865
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 28 09:07:30 2019
New Revision: 268333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-28 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/89064
PR tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89087
Bug ID: 89087
Summary: Dllexport for explicit template instantiation with
nested classes loses nested class
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking, lto
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89076
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 28 09:36:50 2019
New Revision: 268334
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268334&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-28 Richard Biener
PR debug/89076
* dwarf2ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|9.0.0 20190120 |
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63689
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
My concern was more about -fcheck=array-temps (runtime) which does not behave
symmetrically to -Warray-temporaries (compilation time).
pr48655 does not plan to modify the verbosity of -Warray-temporaries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88856
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89073
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 28 10:38:29 2019
New Revision: 268335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89073
* doc/invoke.texi (-mclwb, -mprfchw, -mrdp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86312
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|False positive with |"False positive" with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 86313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86313
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
From pr86313, the test
program p
integer :: f
integer, dimension(1:3) :: u
f = 1
u = f + (/0, 1, 2/)
print *, u
end
gives a warning at compile time with -ffrontend-optimize, but not wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86432
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79325
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71820
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
*** Bug 79325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89088
Bug ID: 89088
Summary: Dllexport for explicit template instantiation missing
inline methods
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
Bug ID: 89089
Summary: [9 regression] various ICEs in range-v3's 1.0 branch
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090
Bug ID: 89090
Summary: vector.tcc uses "if constexpr" in C++11 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89027
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
--- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 45539
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45539&action=edit
first ICE
Build with:
g++9 -std=c++17 -fconcepts -Wall -Wextra variant.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 45540
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45540&action=edit
second ICE
g++9 -std=c++17 -fconcepts -Wall -Wextra concat.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
--- Comment #4 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 45541
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45541&action=edit
third ICE
g++9 -std=c++17 -fconcepts -Wall -Wextra take_while.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
--- Comment #5 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
PS: I do have to correct myself: since range-v3 now auto-detects concept
support the tests are indeed built with -fconcepts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89083
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89083
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89045
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45542
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45542&action=edit
gcc9-pr89045.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase from #c2, doesn't really need -fconcepts, ICEs also with just
-std=c++17. Doesn't ICE without no_unique_address, G++ 8 ignores that
attribute with a warning.
template struct A {};
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88593
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And isn't it latent on all older branches too? Or do you have revision number
between 8 and 9 that broke this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88100
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89089
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89083
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I think the fix will be same as for PR80864, maybe along the lines of not
reshaping an already reshaped init. I think r268321 more of less uncovered a
latent problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #17 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8)
> Luke, do you ever build gcc?
I applied these patches to 8.2.0 and got the expected error message and iostat
of 26. Looks good to me. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
Bug ID: 89091
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Csaba Ráduly from comment #0)
> The two nested "#if __cplusplus >= 201103L" checks are suspicious
> (copy-paste error?)
> Generating preprocessor output from a one-liner of #include with
> -st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89080
--- Comment #2 from chss95cs at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Please paste/attach testcases here.
This is the code that caused the ICE. I put it in the URL field:
https://godbolt.org/z/1IOgpU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||87007
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #5 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092
Bug ID: 89092
Summary: Host-associated generic used instead of use-associated
TBP in call
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Probably the same issue as in 89083 -- which I'm currently assigned to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:56:48PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > The second one appears to be OK.
>
> The second one is invalid.
>
> f2008:C565
> A data-stmt-object or data-i-do-object shall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
Bug ID: 89093
Summary: C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Like in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670069 (another wrong-code
that has been reported to us today), eh_personality.cc (__gxx_personality_v0)
is compiled this way since r266385. Though, in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89094
Bug ID: 89094
Summary: collect2.c:main c_argv buffer is undersized when -EL,
-EB or -B used in COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf ---
Another testcase suitable for debugging is the following, which better
shows correspondence for pre-F2008 and F2008+ variants:
program test
implicit none
integer, pointer :: t(:), u(:)
integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
So I'm not really an Arm person or a GCC person, but doesn't the personality
routine call the landing pad, as identified by the LDSA? And then that ends
with a call to __cxa_end_cleanup, which is clear a no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I admit I don't know much about ARM unwinding, which is different from all the
other arches, but normally the personality routine doesn't call the landing pad
code nor anything similar, it should set some reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
Okay, please assume that __gxx_personality_v0 is a red herring. Apparently,
there is unwinding information for VFP registers, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68933
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 68933, which changed state.
Bug 68933 Summary: ICE when mixing "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" and
"-fcoarray=lib" on gcc-6 only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68933
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89095
Bug ID: 89095
Summary: gcc-dg-prune calls check_effective_target_offload_gcn
every time
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #2 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> But
>
> vxorps %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
> vcvtsd2ss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
>
> are faster than both.
On Skylake-client (i7-6700k), I can't reproduce this r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
I have a patch for PR 87007:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00298.html
>
> which inserts a vxorps at the last possible position. vxorps
> will be exe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > But
> >
> > vxorps %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
> > vcvtsd2ss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
> >
> > are faster than both.
>
> On
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jan 28 22:14:27 2019
New Revision: 268343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88358 - name wrongly treated as type.
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid, patch |rejects-valid
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89002
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 28 22:33:33 2019
New Revision: 268345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89002
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18017
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89002
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 28 22:34:32 2019
New Revision: 268346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268346&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89002
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
Bug ID: 89096
Summary: [6/7/8/9 regression] AIX 7 linker rejects
_.ro_ sections by default
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89073
--- Comment #4 from Jacob Nevins ---
Ah, should have looked harder.
Thank you for adding it to the place I looked first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 28 23:21:10 2019
New Revision: 268348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/86125
* c-decl.c (last_fileptr_type): Remove.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This line has been there for a long time now.
Maybe what is in main_input_filename changed ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Paprocki ---
Specifying -bnotextro does not make a working binary:
Could not load program x:
Relocation failed for x because:
Relocation entry 3 (at address 0x10416AD3)
has an invalid l_rsecnm field.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89086
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89045
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 28 23:49:51 2019
New Revision: 268349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/89045
* c-decl.c (build_compound_literal): Don't push
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89045
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 28 23:58:57 2019
New Revision: 268350
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268350&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68737 Do not use vsnprintf on HPUX
It doesn't conform to t
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
