https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Pfau ---
OK, thanks for testing. I'll post a patch to the ML this evening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c++
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89444
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Sorry for breakage and thanks for the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89440
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I believe we can simply remove the assert since for nested cycles we can
handle this just fine. With integers we get
t2.c:7:3: missed: inner-loop induction only used outside of the outer
vectorized l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431
--- Comment #7 from MarkEggleston ---
The only reason this PR was raised was because an attempt to use conditional
compilation based on integer kinds failed because the implementation did not
match the documentation.
There is no issue with the e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 22 08:36:30 2019
New Revision: 269097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87609
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 22 08:38:14 2019
New Revision: 269098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-22 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/87609
* cf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89436
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
This was previously reported as PR 86096. Let me copy-paste my response from
there:
df_mw_compare has:
if (mw1->mw_reg != mw2->mw_reg)
return mw1->mw_order - mw2->mw_order;
Note mw_reg in the '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #3)
> Created attachment 43650 [details]
> another testcase
>
> On x86_64-linux, when compiled with "gcc-7 -O2 -fsanitize=address" this
> testcase prints nothing. With "g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||przemyslaw.wirkus at arm dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Bug ID: 89447
Summary: libgo largefile support is incomplete and inconsistent
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> df_mw_compare has:
>
>if (mw1->mw_reg != mw2->mw_reg)
> return mw1->mw_order - mw2->mw_order;
>
> Note mw_reg in the 'if' vs mw_order in the 'retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 45796
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45796&action=edit
Initial patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
Bug ID: 89448
Summary: Failure to generate diagnostic for "complex int" (OK
for "_Complex int")
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
FWIW, after this patch and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01815.html
only the runtime failures mentioned there and go/build (which times out
after 4 minutes, just as it d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
> Do you have https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01332.html too?
I have a similar patch from Ian, otherwise results are way wors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 45797
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45797&action=edit
Patch candidate
Patch candidate where I made some refactoring and come up with tests.
Works fine on x86_64, on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
> 2. What should we do with sections like .data.rel.ro, .data.rel.ro.local?
> They suffer from this bug too, but it's not that easy to put globals there,
> as you must set various attributes onto decl to ensu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89441
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89449
Bug ID: 89449
Summary: False -Wsuggest-attribute=format warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:50:02 2019
New Revision: 269103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Silence '-Whsa' diagnostic in 'gfortran.dg/goacc/pr78027.f90'
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:50:35 2019
New Revision: 269105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR72741] Use 'oacc_build_routine_dims' for Fortran OpenACC 'routine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89440
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:52:49 2019
New Revision: 269111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89450
Bug ID: 89450
Summary: RFC: Strengthen -fstrict-enums
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89450
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
Bug ID: 89451
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 -O
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89450
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Well the documentation says this:
> basically, a value that can be represented in the minimum number of bits
> needed to represent all the enumerators
>
> So if w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> In any case, the ICE does not occur with gfortran 8.2.0, and I'm pretty sure
> it was not present on trunk in December.
More specifically, I think it must have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89449
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Grrr, shame on me :P RTFM rules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
nOn Fri, 22 Feb 2019, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
>
> --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to janus from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45783|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89448
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89450
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Indeed, at least we shouldn't change the middle-end representation. The FE can
of course warn more strictly if the language allows.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093
--- Comment #30 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #29)
> Ramana, any progress on this?
I'm still trying to get the various spec files and the t-multilib bits sorted
and half-term has intervened here in the UK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89449
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just for reference:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.2.0/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#Common-Function-Attributes
:
For functions where the arguments are not available to be checked (such as
vprintf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89444
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 22 12:49:21 2019
New Revision: 269114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86: (Reapply) Move AESNI generation to Skylake and Goldmont
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, yes, the ICE was obviously introduced with r269098.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89452
Bug ID: 89452
Summary: basic_stringbuf::seekoff and basic_stringbuf::seekpos
implementations
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89444
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45790|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
--- Comment #23 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Feb 22 13:46:01 2019
New Revision: 269115
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269115&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85598
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (pass_sprintf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89449
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89453
Bug ID: 89453
Summary: Bug parsing "," operator with openmp
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89366
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #6 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88273
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #51 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87513
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo