https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
Bug ID: 89630
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In a non-bootstrapped compiler I certainly can't reproduce, nor reproduced it
in bootstrap when I've tested the patch. How exactly have you configured your
compiler?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> In a non-bootstrapped compiler I certainly can't reproduce, nor reproduced
> it in bootstrap when I've tested the patch. How exactly have you configured
> your compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, ok, I was trying -march=skylake-avx512, but not -mrtm, now I can reproduce.
As this is not a bootstrapped compiler, it can't be miscompiled, so I bet all
my patch changed is adding a few DECL_UIDs (for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 89578, which changed state.
Bug 89578 Summary: [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast
-flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:20:12 2019
New Revision: 269484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269484&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-08 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/89578
* cfg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89624
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Why do we care for -fshort-enums? Aren't those outside of the standard?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> Created attachment 45926 [details]
> rh1686696.c
>
> r269302 also fixed the following testcase that has been miscompiled on
> s390x-linux with -march=zEC12 -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89627
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
FWIW this has been extracted from the swig testsuite.
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:RISCV/swig/standard/riscv64
[ 3650s]
["/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/swig-3.0.12/Examp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> > Created attachment 45926 [details]
> > rh1686696.c
> >
> > r269302 also fixed the following testcase that has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89550
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:46:39 2019
New Revision: 269485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89550
* builtins.c (c_strlen): Only s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80058
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:51:28 2019
New Revision: 269487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/80058
* lra-constraints.c (process_alt_operands):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79846
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:53:27 2019
New Revision: 269489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79846
* config/s390/s390.c (s390_const_operand_o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:52:38 2019
New Revision: 269488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/8
* ipa-devirt.c (compare_virtual_tables): Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 10:52:38 2019
New Revision: 269488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/8
* ipa-devirt.c (compare_virtual_tables): Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80058
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 80058, which changed state.
Bug 80058 Summary: fix double spaces in string literals everywhere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80058
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 79846, which changed state.
Bug 79846 Summary: s390: untranslatable diagnostic in s390.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79846
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79846
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 8, which changed state.
Bug 8 Summary: diagnostics: trailing spaces in "one definition rule "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665
Chung-Ju Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89049
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Just an update on costs:
t.c:1:35: note: === vect_compute_single_scalar_iteration_cost ===
0x483e120 *_3 1 times scalar_load costs 12 in body
0x483e120 _4 + r_16 1 times scalar_stmt costs 12 in body
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
Bug ID: 89631
Summary: gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:1647:15:Semantic Issue: comparison of
two values with different enumeration types in switch
statement ('enum rtx_code' and 'tree_code'):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-3-8
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63560
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 8 12:37:54 2019
New Revision: 269491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Restrict IPA split (PR go/63560).
2019-03-08 Jan Hubicka
PR g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63560
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 8 12:55:40 2019
New Revision: 269492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86: Disable jump tables when retpolines are used (PR target/86952).
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
More simplified testcase:
/* PR middle-end/89497 */
static unsigned long *
foo (unsigned long *x)
{
return x + (1 + *x);
}
__attribute__((noipa)) unsigned long
bar (unsigned long *x)
{
unsigned long c,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
>
> --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> More simplified testcase:
> /* PR middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
POLY_INT_CST == USE so no actual harm done I guess (besides not handling
CONST_POLY_INT).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89632
Bug ID: 89632
Summary: documentation bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
One option would be to just rename the base class (possibly only the default
new_allocator one, as selecting a different allocator implementation is an
explicit choice, and so users can deal with the conseq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Mar 8 14:04:27 2019
New Revision: 269495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269495&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add tests for resolved PR (PR c/85870).
2019-03-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87553
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Any progress on this please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67062
--- Comment #2 from Luke Allardyce ---
--host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
--target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 or i686-w64-mingw32
I can't remember if it broke on either or both of the above targets and don't
have access to an OSX machine any more. --build was le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
David: Are you planning to send for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89633
Bug ID: 89633
Summary: Inner class cannot pass a lambda to a template
function in outer class
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87553
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> Any progress on this please?
I haven't seen this after 20181116 and the last gcc-testresults posting
showing the failure on AIX 7.2 is from 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87553
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, I've also found that it doesn't fail on x86_64 with r269301 even when the
optimized dump is identical to s390x. Debugging now, in the third iteration of
the outer loop the inner loop doesn't stop wher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> David: Are you planning to send for it?
I'm not sure what you mean by this, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87404
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
I can try, sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634
Bug ID: 89634
Summary: gmp-ecm miscompilation on s390x with -march=zEC12 -m64
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
Bug ID: 89635
Summary: More ANSI SGR codes in diagnostics?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68924
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 8 15:53:47 2019
New Revision: 269497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68924
PR target/78782
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87558
--- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 8 15:53:47 2019
New Revision: 269497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68924
PR target/78782
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78782
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 8 15:53:47 2019
New Revision: 269497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68924
PR target/78782
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68924
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
_mm_loadu_si64 intrinsic can now be used in the example from #Description:
#include
#include
__m256 load_bytes_to_m256(uint8_t *p)
{
__m128i small_load = _mm_loadu_si64( (void *)p );
__m256i intvec = _mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68924
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 68924, which changed state.
Bug 68924 Summary: No intrinsic for x86 `MOVQ m64, %xmm` in 32bit mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68924
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78782
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 78782, which changed state.
Bug 78782 Summary: [x86] _mm_loadu_si64 intrinsic missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78782
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87558
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 87558, which changed state.
Bug 87558 Summary: Missing _mm_storeu_si64() intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87558
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89632
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45927
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45927&action=edit
gcc9-pr89634.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89628
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493
Matthew Malcomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is another variant, possibly illegal:
module m_vstring
implicit none
public :: vstring_length
character ( len = vstring_length() ) :: char_string
contains
pure integer function vs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> The test case is now rejected with trunk, looks like a recent 9 regression:
>
> ig25@linux-p51k:/tmp> gfortran m_vstring.f90
> m_vstring.f90:24:30:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80012
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Would be useful to find out which commit triggered this change ...
Revision r267783 (pr88376) seems to be a good suspect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #13)
> Actually, I cannot reproduce it on the trunk anymore as of r265575.
So can this be closed then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The usual procedure would be to bisect when it stopped ICEing, note it here and
see if that was a real fix, if yes and the corresponding testcase of the fix is
very different from this one add the testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Without bisection it's hard to identify what fix to backport. Note the
> original issue doesn't reproduce for me with a cross to
> x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:18:23 2019
New Revision: 269500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix POLY_INT_CST/CONST_POLY_INT typo (PR 89631)
2019-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89631
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Fixed on trunk. Will backport to GCC 8 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88183
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:19:55 2019
New Revision: 269501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88183 - ICE with .* fold-expression.
build_m_component_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87513
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:21:02 2019
New Revision: 269502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87513 - 'sorry' mangling PMF template-id.
Here build_offs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89422
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:22:20 2019
New Revision: 269503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269503&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89422 - ICE with -g and lambda in default arg in template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82075
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:31:27 2019
New Revision: 269504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269504&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82075
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp49.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87734
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > Would be useful to find out which commit triggered this change ...
>
> Revision r267783 (pr88376) seems to be a good suspect.
You mean r2677
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 79477, which changed state.
Bug 79477 Summary: Please write code more translator-friendly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79477
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89624
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, it's just a different, but still conforming, interpretation of the
standard.
> For an enumeration whose underlying type is not fixed, the underlying type
> is an integral type that can represent all th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85936
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89633
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lebedev.ri at gmail dot com
--- Commen
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo