[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #34 from Matthias Klose --- Author: doko Date: Sun Mar 10 07:25:13 2019 New Revision: 269546 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269546&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/cp/ 2019-04-10 Matthias Klose Backport from the gcc-8 br

[Bug fortran/89646] New: Spurious actual argument might interfere warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646 Bug ID: 89646 Summary: Spurious actual argument might interfere warning Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug fortran/89645] New: No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 Bug ID: 89645 Summary: No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() ) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 64678, which changed state. Bug 64678 Summary: [F03] Expected association error on dependent associate statements https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/64678] [F03] Expected association error on dependent associate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64678] [F03] Expected association error on dependent associate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678 Ian Harvey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian_harvey at bigpond dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/89644] New: False-positive -Warray-bounds diagnostic on strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89644 Bug ID: 89644 Summary: False-positive -Warray-bounds diagnostic on strncpy Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/70349] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag18a.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler _ZZ1fB7__test1vEN1T1gB7__test2Ev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70349 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Mar 9 22:58:24 2019 New Revision: 269542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70349 * g++.dg/abi/abi-tag18a.C: Skip on 32-b

[Bug c++/89643] New: constexpr capture not working inside expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89643 Bug ID: 89643 Summary: constexpr capture not working inside expression Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ada/89609] bug box caused by access to function as a record component via a limited with

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89609 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68733] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 --- Comment #20 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Mar 9 22:32:30 2019 New Revision: 269541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269541&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68733 * c-c++-common/gomp/clauses-2.c

[Bug testsuite/89472] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-times DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)[^#/!@;\\|]*[#/!@;\\|]+ +[^#/!@\\|]*\\(DIE \\(0x[0-9a-f]*\\) DW_TAG_variable 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89472 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/89472] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-times DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)[^#/!@;\\|]*[#/!@;\\|]+ +[^#/!@\\|]*\\(DIE \\(0x[0-9a-f]*\\) DW_TAG_variable 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89472 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Mar 9 22:13:01 2019 New Revision: 269540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269540&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/89472 * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c:

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87750] [8/9 Regression] Failed compilation / parsing of template member call after 'using' declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Mar 9 21:49:41 2019 New Revision: 269539 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269539&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/87750 * g+

[Bug rtl-optimization/89588] [8/9 Regression] ICE in unroll_loop_constant_iterations, at loop-unroll.c:498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89588 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/87673] [7/8/9 Regression] Errors caused by using function for character length in allocate with typespec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5 Summary|Errors caused by

[Bug fortran/87673] Errors caused by using function for character length in allocate with typespec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/87010] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/20180712-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87010 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Mar 9 19:56:06 2019 New Revision: 269535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269535&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR inline-asm/87010 * gcc.dg/torture/20180712-1.c: S

[Bug d/89041] ICE in get_frame_for_symbol, at d/d-codegen.cc:2175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89041 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/89041] ICE in get_frame_for_symbol, at d/d-codegen.cc:2175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89041 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Sat Mar 9 19:29:29 2019 New Revision: 269533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269533&root=gcc&view=rev Log: d: Fix ICE in get_frame_for_symbol When generating code for

[Bug fortran/71544] gfortran compiler optimization bug when dealing with c-style pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 9 19:21:24 2019 New Revision: 269532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-09 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71544 * trans-t

[Bug fortran/89639] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 05:50:43PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > >> > > Thanks. When I wrote the test, I tried to skip the > > REAL128 case with the "if (real128 >) then" ... > > blocks, and com

[Bug fortran/84504] [F08] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/84504] [F08] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sat Mar 9 18:25:39 2019 New Revision: 269529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269529&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix PR 84504 2019-03-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/84504

[Bug c++/89642] New: gcc rejects valid implicit typename context in cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89642 Bug ID: 89642 Summary: gcc rejects valid implicit typename context in cast Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/89639] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-03-09 12:43 p.m., sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 > > --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- > On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 04

[Bug fortran/89639] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 04:12:23PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 > > --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > On 2019-03-08 8:26 p.

[Bug fortran/70739] VALUE attribute interpretation in a non-interoperable procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70739 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/89639] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Mar 9 16:31:46 2019 New Revision: 269527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269527&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/89639 * gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90: Skip

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8/9 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #29 from John David Anglin --- /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc:136: void test05(): Assertion 'aligned(p)' failed. FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc executi

[Bug fortran/87838] Segmentation fault with function pointer to contained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87838 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/89639] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-03-08 8:26 p.m., kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Just XFAIL the testcase. I'm going to skip test as it still fails when XFAIL'd as on arm.  The test fails due to compile error.

[Bug other/89635] More ANSI SGR codes in diagnostics?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- evaned posted this mockup of how it could look: https://imgur.com/tNg6qfh

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 9 14:10:17 2019 New Revision: 269526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269526&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-09 Thomas König PR fortran/71203 * decl.c (

[Bug debug/68836] GCC can't properly emit debug info for function arguments in a back-trace when using -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68836 Allan Jensen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linux at carewolf dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug debug/86582] [debug] vla size reported as 0 at Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86582 Allan Jensen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linux at carewolf dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c/88568] [7/8 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] |[7/8 Regression] |'dll

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 9 12:08:23 2019 New Revision: 269525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/88568 * attribs.c (handle_dll_attribute): Don't clea

[Bug fortran/84504] [F08] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 --- Comment #8 from nmsriram at gmail dot com --- Thank you! I had given up on this. :-) Sriram On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 7:48 PM janus at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 > > -

[Bug fortran/84504] [F08] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following patch fixes the problem and shows no regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c index 51552a79cde..4e95f243661 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #22 from jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> --- Bootstrapped sucessfully on x86_64-pc-cygwin, test compiles and has the data member dllimported. Patch looks good.

[Bug fortran/84504] [F08] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[F03] procedure pointer |[F08] procedure pointer

[Bug fortran/84504] [F03] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Stat

[Bug ipa/89341] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:1332

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > David: Are you planning to send for it? > I'm not sure what you mean by this, sorry. I'm sorry for bad formulation.

[Bug fortran/89621] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with allocatable character and openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89621 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79645] missing period in microblaze.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79645 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/79926] i386: untranslated placeholder "exception/interrupt" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 79645, which changed state. Bug 79645 Summary: missing period in microblaze.opt https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79645 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 79926, which changed state. Bug 79926 Summary: i386: untranslated placeholder "exception/interrupt" in diagnostic https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/89634] gmp-ecm miscompilation on s390x with -march=zEC12 -m64 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79645] missing period in microblaze.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79645 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 9 09:28:04 2019 New Revision: 269523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269523&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/79645 * common.opt (fdiagnostics-show-labels,

[Bug rtl-optimization/89634] gmp-ecm miscompilation on s390x with -march=zEC12 -m64 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 9 08:25:48 2019 New Revision: 269522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/89634 * cfgcleanup.c (thread_jump): Pu

[Bug libstdc++/89641] New: std::atomic no longer works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89641 Bug ID: 89641 Summary: std::atomic no longer works Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Ass