https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
jynelson at email dot sc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jynelson at email dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
Austin Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asbeer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89776
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-*-* |powerpc*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #22)
> Created attachment 46014 [details]
> Patch
>
> Previous patch broke gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_6.f08 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. It
> seems we need to handle the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 64777, which changed state.
Bug 64777 Summary: [Coarray] CO_BROADCAST: Finalization/dealloc of alloc
components missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64777
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 64777, which changed state.
Bug 64777 Summary: [Coarray] CO_BROADCAST: Finalization/dealloc of alloc
components missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64777
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64777
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87838
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Could you please compile with the -g flag, in order to get a more meaningful
> backtrace? Alternatively try running the executable via gdb or valgrind
> for further debugging.
Any progress before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Also we can use constraint "vm" instead of "v" for vfpclassp[sd] instructions.
ndex: gcc/config/i386/sse.md
===
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
Bug ID: 89803
Summary: Missing AVX512 intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89793
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's no assignment operator from std::allocator, so it's not
equivalent to construction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40978
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
In the dump-tree-original I see
...
D.3906 = offset.2;
D.3907 = ubound.0;
D.3908 = (integer(kind=4)[0:] * restrict) c.data;
D.3909 = c.offset;
D.3910 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #4 from Denis ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> (In reply to Denis from comment #0)
>
> > The bug occurs when you have a module with some name (lets name it init) and
> > it uses a module with an aliased subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #3 from Denis ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> (In reply to Denis from comment #0)
>
> > The bug occurs when you have a module with some name (lets name it init) and
> > it uses a module with an aliased subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45989|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Bug 37131 depends on bug 68009, which changed state.
Bug 68009 Summary: [7/8 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with
inline matmul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 23 16:01:57 2019
New Revision: 269890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269890=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68009
Backport from trunk
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 23 15:58:25 2019
New Revision: 269889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269889=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68009
Backport from trunk
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Summary|"is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The dump-tree-original shows
...
if (name_format != 0B) goto L.1;
name_format = (character(kind=1)[1:.name_format] *) __builtin_malloc (1);
goto L.2;
L.1:;
if (.name_format == 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam at aphirst dot karoo.co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 88455, which changed state.
Bug 88455 Summary: False positive for allocatable character array of deferred
length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81962
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> But this is very likely to be the effect of inlining, and gcc should be able
> to print an inline "stack trace": ...
The warning is gone if I compile the test with '-Wall -O3 -fno-inline'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89583
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I just rebuilt r269886 on x86_64-apple-darwin15 (with --disable-bootstrap)
and it passed:
PASS: gnat.dg/socket2.adb (test for excess errors)
PASS: gnat.dg/socket2.adb execution test
Also,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34311
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43038
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The test in comment 7 compiles without any warning with gfortran 6.4.1 and
before.
In a similar way the original test starts to give the warnings
pr77504.f90:10:0: Warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87968
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 87968, which changed state.
Bug 87968 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] Warning about uninizialized variables in
array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87968
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 87968 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87143
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 87143, which changed state.
Bug 87143 Summary: Uninitialized warnings when using automatic array allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87143
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at fluidgravity dot
co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88521
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89583
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Added:
>trunk/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/socket2.adb
This test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin18:
raised GNAT.SOCKETS.SOCKET_ERROR : [22] Invalid argument
FAIL: gnat.dg/socket2.adb execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89793
--- Comment #8 from du yang ---
>
> struct Message {
> template
> Message(T&& t) : s{t} { }
> string s;
> };
>
By the way, it works on both GCC 8 & 7, if change the code above as below
(change to use assignment),
struct Message {
43 matches
Mail list logo
