https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90550
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r145440. Before that:
90550.C: In function ‘void f() [with = int]’:
90550.C:9: instantiated from here
90550.C:5: error: ‘b’ has incomplete type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90536
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:06:32PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90536
>
> --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89371
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Desitter ---
Considering:
#include
#include
#include
void ff(double* res, double const* a, double const* b, int n1, int n2)
{
#pragma omp simd collapse(2)
for(int i1=0; i1 < n1; ++i1)
{
for(int i2=0; i2 < n2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61663
Nick Krempel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndkrempel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 46387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46387&action=edit
patch to ignore type_canonical for TTP
Does this work better?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90038
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon May 20 17:43:05 2019
New Revision: 271427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libfortran/90038 Use posix_spawn, reap dead children when wait=.false.
Ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
--- Comment #17 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-05-20 8:37 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> AFAICS pa is using LRA now.
I wish.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83431
--- Comment #3 from Matteo Croce ---
I can reproduce it with this snippet:
void f()
{
const char *dir = "a";
const char file[50] = "b";
char buf[4];
snprintf(buf, si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90551
Bug ID: 90551
Summary: New test case gcc.c-torture/compile/pr90263.c from
r271400 reports unresolved
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
I think I have an idea what might be the problem.
Does the code do something like
call foo(a)
...
subroutine foo(a)
real, dimension(:) :: a
call bar(a,size(n))
...
subroutine bar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90552
Bug ID: 90552
Summary: attribute((optimize(3))) not overriding -Os
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83431
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85679
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon May 20 19:10:57 2019
New Revision: 271435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
CWG 2094 - volatile scalars are trivially copyable.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85679
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90525
--- Comment #2 from Miguel Ojeda ---
I see. About offset 1: even if it is not (formally) out of bounds, memset will
end up dereferencing it. In the end, what users care about is that b and c are
being overwritten (even users that know about the o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765
--- Comment #15 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Mon May 20 20:07:12 2019
New Revision: 271436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-05-20 Kelvin Nilsen
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90548
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
We ended up with an empty call_args vec because the pack expanded here:
18842 /* Expand the pack expansion and push each entry onto
18843CALL_ARGS. */
18844
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90527
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 20 21:29:17 2019
New Revision: 271438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/90527
* alloc.c (_GNU_SOURCE): Define.
Modifie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89424
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90527
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 20 21:29:49 2019
New Revision: 271439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/90527
* alloc.c (_GNU_SOURCE): Define.
Modifie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59813
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 20 21:33:46 2019
New Revision: 271440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59813
PR target/90418
* function.h (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90418
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 20 21:33:46 2019
New Revision: 271440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59813
PR target/90418
* function.h (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90547
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90500
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The copy attribute is intended to copy attributes that are properties of
the function itself (e.g. "pure"), but not those that are properties of a
particular symbol for the function (e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90503
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 20 22:01:32 2019
New Revision: 271442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/90503
* gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c (dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90503
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86, x86_64|x86_64
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90503
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 20 22:24:38 2019
New Revision: 271445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/90503
* gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c (dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80592
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59753
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80502
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Evan Nemerson from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > _OPENMP_SIMD is a bad idea, that namespace is reserved for OpenMP, so unless
> > it shows up in the OpenMP standar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
Bug ID: 90553
Summary: Register allocation allocates post-incremented
address-load of call to call-clobbered register
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90553
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(JFTR the cutnpaste got tangled with paste and tape everywhere; the newlib
function in newlib/libc/misc/init.c is named __libc_init_array)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.anglin at bell dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90552
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90549
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90545
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90525
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The part of -Warray-bounds that checks offsets in calls to built-ins (as
opposed to the subscript operator) is a part of the -Wrestrict implementation.
It exists mainly to avoid some pathological instances of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90549
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90252
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Rodgers ---
Author: rodgertq
Date: Tue May 21 04:37:45 2019
New Revision: 271451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
tbb-backend effective target should check ability to link TBB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90551
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 21 06:55:07 2019
New Revision: 271454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Move a test-case (PR testsuite/90551).
2019-05-21 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo