https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90354
--- Comment #4 from vfdff ---
Another issue, it is not suiteable for some target supported more than 2 insns
issued together ? But the following code already exist very long without
problem.
/* ??? Hopefully multiple delay slots are not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68943
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||meta-bug
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
Bug ID: 90709
Summary: [meta-bug] GNU Objective C (C++) cannot consume
current headers on Darwin platforms.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90708
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90708
Bug ID: 90708
Summary: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support lightweight
generics.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707
Bug ID: 90707
Summary: GNU Objective C (C++) does not support nullability
syntax.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
Bug ID: 90706
Summary: Useless code generated for stack / register operations
on AVR
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90705
Bug ID: 90705
Summary: Suboptimal register allocation on ARM when compiling
for size
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90704
Bug ID: 90704
Summary: filesystem::path overloads for file streams are not
conforming
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90703
Bug ID: 90703
Summary: A virtuous bug: `=delete` accepted on second
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9/10 regression] |[7/8/9 regression] Failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Jun 1 19:59:30 2019
New Revision: 271839
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271839=gcc=rev
Log:
Darwin, x86, testsuite - adjust tests for Darwin PR90698.
We don't have support for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90702
Bug ID: 90702
Summary: FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/proj.cc execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
-nostdlib controls which libraries to link against, you can still link against
a set of C library.
While -ffreestanding controls if you are compiling freestanding C (which is
part of the C standard).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
--- Comment #5 from tfx ---
CVE-2018-20673 has been assigned to this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
jynelson at email dot sc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Jun 1 17:27:20 2019
New Revision: 271838
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271838=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/90694 - incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
--- Comment #1 from jynelson at email dot sc.edu ---
See also the corrosponding Clang bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42099
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90701
Bug ID: 90701
Summary: GCC inserts a call to memset when compiling with
-nostdlib
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88751
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #4)
> (In reply to Babneet Singh from comment #3)
> > Hi Andreas and Richard: What's the status for this issue? Which approach
> > will be used to resolve this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90676
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90578
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Can you please explain what you expect?
As usual, the impossible;-)
More seriously:
(1) the test suite should not invoke undefined behavior, i.e., the test
gfortran.dg/lrshift_1.f90 should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700
Bug ID: 90700
Summary: Wrong constraints for tuple(allocator_arg_t, const A&,
const tuple&)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85254
--- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Sat Jun 1 10:57:12 2019
New Revision: 271835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271835=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85254
gcc/cp
PR c++/85254
* class.c (fixup_type_variants):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68901
--- Comment #10 from Trass3r ---
Yeah short on time. (plus the testsuite can't be run properly in WSL due to
stack overflows: https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/633)
Feel free to pick up the patch.
Any comments on ARTIFICIAL not being used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79716
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. The issue is that DSE does not track variable-size stores like
> this
> and thus stmt_kills_ref_p (temp, ref) returns false for memcpy and the ref
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #98 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Jun 1 07:41:06 2019
New Revision: 271834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271834=gcc=rev
Log:
Darwin - backport fix for PR bootstrap/89864
2019-06-01 Iain Sandoe
40 matches
Mail list logo
