https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
--- Comment #1 from Valentine ---
Simpler example without any include's:
===
volatile int SIZE = 100;
template
void bar(T t, U... u) {
t(u...);
}
template
void foo(Ts&... out) {
char buf[SIZE];
bar([&buf, &out...](auto&... x) { (x,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90544
Kuang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||master at a1983 dot com.cn
--- Comment #2 from K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90721
--- Comment #1 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
One more observation same test case getting PASS on x86
root@akhilesh-ubuntu:/home/akhilesh.k/gcc-arm-src-snapshot-8.3-2019.03/gcc/testsuite#
gcc ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c -flto -fgnu89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|amodra at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Jun 4 00:13:07 2019
New Revision: 271895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR90689, ICE in extract_insn on ppc64le
PR target/90689
* c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90739
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90738
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 3 22:31:45 2019
New Revision: 271887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90700 Fix constructor constraint for std::tuple
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90739
Bug ID: 90739
Summary: [10 regression] Fortran pointer array tests fails
after r271860
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90738
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20190601 (r271838) and 20190603 (r271873), two fortran tests regressed:
+FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks for the heads up. I scanned the testsuite for the pattern but couldn't
find any matching tests:
$ find gcc/testsuite/ -type f | xargs grep "&\*[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*\[" | grep
scan | wc -l
0
Please l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This compiles when the parm 'b' is not const.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
--- Comment #2 from Berni ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1)
> (In reply to Berni from comment #0)
> > pushing r0 does not make sense at all since it is by definition a temporary
> > register that can freely be modified. Maybe it'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #99 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Jun 3 19:13:46 2019
New Revision: 271881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, backport fixes for PR 89864 (with 90379 included)
2019-06-03 Iain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
Bug ID: 90737
Summary: wrong code returning address of a local converted to
intptr_t
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The problem is in this function in gimple-low.c:
/* Lower a GIMPLE_RETURN GSI. DATA is passed through the recursion. */
static void
lower_gimple_return (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, struct lower_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On June 3, 2019 6:54:10 PM GMT+02:00, "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
>
>--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
>Created attachment 46446
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Beliveau ---
Started with commit r261971
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
Bug ID: 90736
Summary: Bogus error with alignas
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The output of the -fdump-tree-all-lineno option shows the correct location
information in the a.c.007t.omplower dump:
;; Function f (f, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1909, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)
f (int i, in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90734
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735
Bug ID: 90735
Summary: missing location in -Wreturn-local-addr on a function
with two return statements
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90734
Bug ID: 90734
Summary: [concepts] Pre-normalization substitution into
constraints of templated function breaks subsumption
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 46446
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46446&action=edit
LTO tree dump from simple test case
So, I tried out a simple program:
$ cat minloc.f90
program main
real, di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90733
Bug ID: 90733
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:6440
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
Bug ID: 90732
Summary: regression - ICE with std::apply after variable length
array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90731
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90728
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90730
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90731
Bug ID: 90731
Summary: regression - noexcept broken for forward declarations
with decltype
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90730
Bug ID: 90730
Summary: -fdump-tree-gimple-optimized-... accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
rs6000.c does
if (HAVE_AS_PLTSEQ
&& DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_ELFv2
&& GET_CODE (func_desc) == SYMBOL_REF)
{
rtvec v = gen_rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
Valentine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v at vsamko dot com
--- Comment #1 from Vale
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2019-05-31 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90729
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90729
Bug ID: 90729
Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math.d FAILs on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90728
Bug ID: 90728
Summary: False positive Wmemset-elt-size with zero size array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90727
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90727
Bug ID: 90727
Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/systime.d etc.
FAIL on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 3 14:05:50 2019
New Revision: 271872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271872&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90686 update C++2a library status docs
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #24 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:55:15 2019
New Revision: 271870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR64242 - Longjmp expansion incorrect
Improve the fix for PR64242. Various
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90726
Bug ID: 90726
Summary: exponential behavior on SCEV results everywhere
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:23:03 2019
New Revision: 271867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271867&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90686 update C++2a library status docs
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90725
Bug ID: 90725
Summary: implicitly used 'this' not diagnosed in static member
fn declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin1(3|4) |x86_64-apple-darwin1(345678
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724
Bug ID: 90724
Summary: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with
-march=armv8.2-a+sve
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90723
Bug ID: 90723
Summary: pr88598-2.c segfaults with -msve-vector-bits=256
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90722
Bug ID: 90722
Summary: ICE with __builtin_convertvector with
-msve-vector-bits=256
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Mon Jun 3 11:27:50 2019
New Revision: 271864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix alignment option parser (PR90684)
Fix the alignment option parser to always a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Summary|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #36 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Orr Shalom Dvory from comment #35)
> Hi, thanks for your respond. can someone mark this bug as need to be
> improved?
> Does anyone agree/disagree with my new proposed method?
It's best to create a new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90721
Bug ID: 90721
Summary: [Bug] ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c
test case getting fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90692
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Michel ---
The principle of this patch is that it breaks the recursion of the specs
function evaluation as soon as a library file is expanded. This is needed
because otherwise, the file path containing a space is broke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Using "vector_operand" "vm" instead
Index: gcc/config/i386/sse.md
===
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md (revision 271853)
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 3 10:17:16 2019
New Revision: 271858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-03 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/90716
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88837
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Mon Jun 3 09:35:37 2019
New Revision: 271857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-03 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720
Bug ID: 90720
Summary: g++.dg/lto/alias-1 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90681
--- Comment #4 from alejandro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alejandro
Date: Mon Jun 3 09:13:32 2019
New Revision: 271856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1
This patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 3 09:03:48 2019
New Revision: 271855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-03 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/90713
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
>
> Segher Boessenkool changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697
>
> --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz fu-berlin.de> ---
> (In repl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
>
> --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
...
> So, dt_parm_1 is still filled with info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 46445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46445&action=edit
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32503
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2007-06-26 10:47:05 |2019-6-3
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719
Bug ID: 90719
Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d FAILs on 32-bit
Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> One thing we would also have to tackle is GFC_LOGICAL arguments.
> C only has one bool type, which is (for gcc) equivalent to
> logical(kind=1). We might just g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The G++ code now uses:
if (is_attribute_p ("visibility", name))
and the test that was failing uses:
// { dg-require-visibility "" }
which also depends on whether the attribute is supported:
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> Another, not mutually exclusive approach would be to make libgfortran LTO
> clean so the more complex minloc etc calls could be pulled in.
Interesti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 46444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46444&action=edit
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce this. Matthias, IIRC the debian version is not 8.3.0 but
> patched - to which rev?
That's currently SVN 20190428 (r270630), see [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718
Bug ID: 90718
Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/socket.d FAILs on 32-bit
Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90717
Bug ID: 90717
Summary: wrong stmt location for breakpoint, XFAIL
gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Cc Iain who probably knows more about the Darwin linker. I'm pretty sure it
> supports visibility now because LLVM's libc++ makes extensive use of
> visibility at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Just as a note - the tree/GIMPLE dumps are not C source code so
> this kind of "issues" are expected. Watch out for testsuite fallout.
For the latter esp. te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Just as a note - the tree/GIMPLE dumps are not C source code so
this kind of "issues" are expected. Watch out for testsuite fallout.
100 matches
Mail list logo
