[Bug tree-optimization/91178] New: GCC fails with internal compiler error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 Bug ID: 91178 Summary: GCC fails with internal compiler error. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #8 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- It is NOT duplicate of PR90369. I belive that I found problem and solution already. Problem is somewhere in binutils. Released version 2.31 nad 2.32 are broken. Previous version 2.30 is OK.

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/80576] dead strcpy and strncpy followed by memset not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80576 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Interestingly enough, it never comes up in gcc AFAICT, at least not the str* followed by memcpy/memset variant that shows up in that BZ. I don't think it'd be terribly hard to support, but if it's not

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- Suggest you run the application under "strace -f" to try to identify what is being duplicated.

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Sounds like a dup of PR93069

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/91050] -mdejagnu-cpu= does not affect the -m assembler option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91050 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Jul 15 20:57:53 2019 New Revision: 273498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273498=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Always output .machine We now can always output .machine (if we

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > FWIW I don't think it was a latent bug though. Previously all we did > with debug insns was estimate their size and speed, which are guaranteed > to come back as zero and thus have no effect. The reason

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- I suppose it is previously latent problem that we do not skip debug statements. Does something like this help? Index: ipa-fnsummary.c === ---

[Bug other/91177] Installation Error on Centos 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91177 --- Comment #3 from John Parke --- Thanks for noticing that. I'm not sure how that got set. Really appreciate your help. John John Parke Alebra Technologies Inc. PO Box 120390 New Brighton, MN  55112 770-425-1810 -Original Message-

[Bug other/91177] Installation Error on Centos 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91177 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug other/91177] Installation Error on Centos 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91177 John Parke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91157] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: position plus size exceeds size of referenced object in 'bit_field_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug other/91177] Installation Error on Centos 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91177 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/91177] New: Installation Error on Centos 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91177 Bug ID: 91177 Summary: Installation Error on Centos 6 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- $ diff -u <(objdump -d stage2-gcc/aarch64.o) <(objdump -d stage3-gcc/aarch64.o) | grep '^[-+].*:$' -8540 <_ZL27target_gen_sibcall_epiloguev>: +8540 <_ZL19target_gen_prologuev>:

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- objdump -d

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #2 from Wilco --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #1) > Dramantic differences in file size are expected, since stage2 is built with > -gtoggle (to suppress debug info) whereas stage 3 is built normally. One of > the

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/91148] PowerPC build gets several warnings due to -Wformat-diag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- And yes, that means a lot of work for whoever wants to make the warning default (during GCC builds or otherwise). The alternative is a lot of work for other people. That is not a good alternative.

[Bug target/91148] PowerPC build gets several warnings due to -Wformat-diag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Let me put it differently, then: Such warnings should not be enabled by default before most it warns about has been fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/80576] dead strcpy and strncpy followed by memset not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80576 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I've seen code similar to it but I don't remember how close they were. I imagine it comes up quite a bit as GCC itself transforms code in various ways. DSE already eliminates stores with constant sizes but

[Bug bootstrap/91176] New: [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 Bug ID: 91176 Summary: [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/91175] New: [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175 Bug ID: 91175 Summary: [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug go/91172] go1: error: control reaches end of non-void function in libgo/go/cmd/cgo/gcc.go

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91172 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- That is the function (*Package).gccDebug, which on GCC 7 branch starts on line 1262 of libgo/go/cmd/cgo/gcc.go. Like Richard I don't understand how you could get that warning. -Wreturn-type is a C

[Bug target/91148] PowerPC build gets several warnings due to -Wformat-diag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c++/91168] -Warray-bounds in valid program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91168 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/89096] [7/8/9/10 regression] AIX 7 linker rejects _.ro_ sections by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096 --- Comment #21 from David Edelsohn --- This error message does not make any sense. The patch fixed the earlier error.

[Bug target/89096] [7/8/9/10 regression] AIX 7 linker rejects _.ro_ sections by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096 Andrew Paprocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/88497] Improve Accumulation in Auto-Vectorized Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497 --- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool --- It still does some weird register moves (the xxlor and the fmr), but those are totally different problems ;-)

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #5 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- I found one new dependency of this bug: GCC 9.1.0 + binutils 2.30 is OK GCC 9.1.0 + binutils 2.32 failing with " error: could not unlink output file" Everything except binutils version was same.

[Bug libstdc++/91170] [9/10 Regression] Crash in pdns resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91170 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- That mostly just adds static_assert checks, which can't change anything at runtime.

[Bug fortran/91160] merge_bits is broken for BOZ arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91160 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:49:31AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Fortran allows the arguments of merge_bits() to be BOZ literal constants. > >

[Bug target/69142] missing documentation for s/390 zvector builtin features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69142 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/91156] The associated Laguerre polynomial should allow negative arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91156 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46598|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/91156] The associated Laguerre polynomial should allow negative arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91156 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.0 |10.0 Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/91174] Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool and char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/91174] New: Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 Bug ID: 91174 Summary: Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] New: [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Bug ID: 91173 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/91172] go1: error: control reaches end of non-void function in libgo/go/cmd/cgo/gcc.go

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91172 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Sounds like global initializers to me. Btw, -Wreturn-type isn't a Go FE warning, and it's initialized to -1, so I wonder why go1 accepts it or has it > 0 (the warning is emitted from

[Bug go/91172] New: go1: error: control reaches end of non-void function in libgo/go/cmd/cgo/gcc.go

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91172 Bug ID: 91172 Summary: go1: error: control reaches end of non-void function in libgo/go/cmd/cgo/gcc.go Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- It's interesting that: echo "int main() {}" > main.c && gcc -c -flto main.c && gcc main.o -flto -MF deps/a.d -MMD is fine. I really suspect: $ cat ./gcc/d/lang-specs.h ... {".d", "@d", 0, 1, 0 }, {".dd",

[Bug tree-optimization/91162] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:86 (error: invalid 'PHI' argument)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91162] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:86 (error: invalid 'PHI' argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91162 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jul 15 12:48:47 2019 New Revision: 273492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273492=gcc=rev Log: 2019-07-15 Richard Biener PR middle-end/91162 * tree-cfg.c

[Bug tree-optimization/91171] [10 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/scop-21.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/91171] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/scop-21.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171 Bug ID: 91171 Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/scop-21.c XPASSes Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/91170] [9/10 Regression] Crash in pdns resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91170 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug ada/91169] New: [10 regression] cd2a31a FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91169 Bug ID: 91169 Summary: [10 regression] cd2a31a FAILs Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug rtl-optimization/91137] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 > > --- Comment #8 from bin cheng --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)

[Bug ada/91169] [10 regression] cd2a31a FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91169 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug libstdc++/91170] New: [9/10 Regression] Crash in pdns resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91170 Bug ID: 91170 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Crash in pdns resolver Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/91137] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 --- Comment #8 from bin cheng --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7) > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 > > > > --- Comment #6 from bin cheng --- > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/91137] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 > > --- Comment #6 from bin cheng --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) >

[Bug rtl-optimization/91137] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137 --- Comment #6 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > and I can very well imagine we're getting confused by find_base_term > logic here. > > There's logic in IVOPTs to not generate IVs based on two different >

[Bug target/85711] ICE in aarch64_classify_address, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:5678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85711 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85711] [8 regression] ICE in aarch64_classify_address, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:5678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85711 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Jul 15 11:00:48 2019 New Revision: 273491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273491=gcc=rev Log: Backport fix for PR85711 Backport from mainline 2019-01-23 Bin Cheng

[Bug tree-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Bisecting the Jul 1st regression now.

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #4 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- It is possible that this bug can be related to https://answers.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+question/682041 Only maybe. I don't know it.

[Bug fortran/91167] -pedantic-errors does not turn -pedantic warnings into errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167 --- Comment #2 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk --- On 15/07/2019 11:24, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug fortran/91167] -pedantic-errors does not turn -pedantic warnings into errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- I think callers are expected to drop dominators if they do not keep them up-to-date. In fact elsewhere we assume there are no unreachable blocks iff dominators are present(?). We've fixed quite a few

[Bug middle-end/91166] [SVE] Unfolded ZIPs of constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91166 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Awww. tree fold_vec_perm (tree type, tree arg0, tree arg1, const vec_perm_indices ) { unsigned int i; unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT nelts; bool need_ctor = false; if (!sel.length ().is_constant ())

[Bug fortran/91160] merge_bits is broken for BOZ arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91160 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/91166] [SVE] Unfolded ZIPs of constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91166 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/91168] New: -Warray-bounds in valid program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91168 Bug ID: 91168 Summary: -Warray-bounds in valid program Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/91167] New: -pedantic-errors does not turn -pedantic warnings into errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167 Bug ID: 91167 Summary: -pedantic-errors does not turn -pedantic warnings into errors Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/91166] New: [SVE] Unfolded ZIPs of constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91166 Bug ID: 91166 Summary: [SVE] Unfolded ZIPs of constants Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug tree-optimization/91162] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:86 (error: invalid 'PHI' argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91162 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So somehow autopar doesn't deal with virtual operands being live across the moved region. move_block_to_fn simply releases virtual PHI defs which leaves uses of it in the IL. It later calls update_ssa

[Bug tree-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Looks like a latent issue to me...

[Bug tree-optimization/91157] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: position plus size exceeds size of referenced object in 'bit_field_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/91162] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:86 (error: invalid 'PHI' argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/91157] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: position plus size exceeds size of referenced object in 'bit_field_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/91155] [9/10 Regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ gets truncated when char template parameter is '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/91155] [9/10 Regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ gets truncated when char template parameter is '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91155 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91162] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:86 (error: invalid 'PHI' argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91162 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87981] ICE: Segmentation fault (in add_phi_arg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87981 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/91165] [10 Regression] error: location references block not in block tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91151] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-7.c fails with its introduction in r273435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---