[Bug fortran/91300] Wrong runtime error message with allocate and errmsg=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91300 --- Comment #2 from zed.three at gmail dot com --- Forgive me, but what is stupid here? The perceived wisdom is that it is best practice to always use `stat` with `allocate`, and the addition of `errmsg` now gives us something portable to hopefull

[Bug libgcc/91306] New: [MSP430] libgcc/crtstuff.c: Alignment of frame_dummy .init_array entry is too big

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91306 Bug ID: 91306 Summary: [MSP430] libgcc/crtstuff.c: Alignment of frame_dummy .init_array entry is too big Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regressio

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 31 09:46:18 2019 New Revision: 273928 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273928&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-07-31 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91178

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.5 |--- Summary|[7/8/9/10 Regres

[Bug tree-optimization/90579] [8/9/10 Regression] Huge store forward stall due to vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579 > > --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- > Transform second loop as > > diff --git a/l

[Bug ipa/91305] ICF compile-time issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91305 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91275] __builtin_crypto_vpmsumd gives different results -O[123] vs -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91275 --- Comment #1 from Lauri Kasanen --- clang 7.0.0 outputs the expected values, aka the gcc -O0 ones, at all optimization levels. (it calls the builtin __builtin_altivec_crypto_vpmsumd, but no other changes)

[Bug tree-optimization/90579] [8/9/10 Regression] Huge store forward stall due to vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- Transform second loop as diff --git a/loop.c b/loop.c index feea9ea..81a3ea6 100644 --- a/loop.c +++ b/loop.c @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ loop (int k, double x) for (i=0;i<6;i++) r[i] = x * a[i + k]; for (i=0;

[Bug ipa/91305] New: ICF compile-time issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91305 Bug ID: 91305 Summary: ICF compile-time issues Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: un

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/91201] [7/8/9/10 Regression] SIMD not generated for horizontal sum of bytes in array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jul 31 09:22:48 2019 New Revision: 273927 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273927&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91201 * config/i386/sse.md (reduc_pl

[Bug c++/61584] What defines std::underlying_type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61584 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Krauss from comment #2) > Currently, enum promotions are incompatible between C and C++ modes. Does that matter? > Furthermore, when C++ requires promotion to signed int but the underly

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 > > --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > > Author: hubicka > > Date: Mon Jul 29 08:18:38 2019 > > New Revisio

[Bug c++/68957] Wrong overload resolution for unscoped enums with fixed underlying type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68957 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/91109] [10 regression][arm] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails since r273135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91109 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug lto/91299] LTO inlines a weak definition in presence of a non-weak definition from an ELF file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > You want to look at the output of the linker resolution file (compile with > -v -save-temps and look for -fresolution=). The linker probably > tells > GCC that i

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/83073] Range for VR_VARYING | [1, 1]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Blocks|

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Author: hubicka > Date: Mon Jul 29 08:18:38 2019 > New Revision: 273866 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273866&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > > PR lto/9

[Bug tree-optimization/91191] vrp and boolean arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83072] Late VRP optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/42436] VRP should mark non-trapping integer divisions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug other/91255] Can't use define_subst in target that uses set_attr_alternative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91255 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/91299] LTO inlines a weak definition in presence of a non-weak definition from an ELF file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi-gcc CC|

[Bug c++/68957] Wrong overload resolution for unscoped enums with fixed underlying type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68957 Roger Orr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rogero at howzatt dot demon.co.uk --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9/10 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Yeah, in the end it's still the vectorizers awkward [dead] code generation but for this testcase (for me) it recurses too deeply via the VN triggered by complete unrolling, doing vn_reference_maybe_forwprop

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 31 07:53:11 2019 New Revision: 273923 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273923&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-07-31 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91257

[Bug middle-end/91301] ICE in omp_add_variable on random access iterator distribute parallel for private (iterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91301 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jul 31 07:49:56 2019 New Revision: 273922 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273922&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91301 * gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): If fo

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9/10 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to w

[Bug lto/91287] LTO disables linking with scalar MASS library (Fortran only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, luoxhu at cn dot ibm.com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287 > > --- Comment #8 from Xiong Hu XS Luo --- > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/86504] vectorization failure for a nest loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86504 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Joel Hutton from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > Hi Richard, > > > So the vectorization issue would be that basic-block vectorization doesn't > > catch this in a

<    1   2