https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, luoxhu at cn dot ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
>
> --- Comment #31 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 5 08:00:30 2019
New Revision: 274109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/91341
* config/i386/avxintrin.h (_mm256_loadu2_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91348
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Bug ID: 91351
Summary: -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91352
Bug ID: 91352
Summary: Jobserver detection uses fcntl, which is not available
on mingw-w64
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
--- Comment #1 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
commit 37db4f8d72cfc87716a729b38aa2f42097cdbf1f
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Oct 2 14:55:39 2018 +
No a*x+b*x factorization for signed vectors
2018-10-02 Marc Glisse
PR mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #33 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #27)
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
> >
> > Kewen Lin changed:
> >
> >W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
--- Comment #24 from Joel Yliluoma ---
The simple horizontal 8-bit add seems to work nicely. Very nice work.
However, the original bug report — that the code snippet quoted below no longer
receives love from the SIMD optimization unless you expl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Huh, it looks like I missed adding the following to freebsd64.h:
>
> #undef CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC
> #undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC
Which of course only works if th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353
Bug ID: 91353
Summary: Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default
initialization in constexprcontexts
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 86638, which changed state.
Bug 86638 Summary: Og guality failures without -ftree-sra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You can still do that without a named variable:
if (static_cast(foo())) {
return 1;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Or add a conversion to bool that does the right thing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|glisse at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91354
Bug ID: 91354
Summary: verify_gimple triggers ICE after reporting 'invalid
types in nop conversion' error for avr target
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91327
j.schleicher at pilz dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
--- Comment #4 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
Yeah, it seems the "bad commit" just somehow triggered this behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91169
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 5 12:30:49 2019
New Revision: 274114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/91169
* fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
> Wouldn't it have been cleaner to split gnu_user.h
I agree. Please do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355
Bug ID: 91355
Summary: optimized code does not call destructor while
unwinding after exception
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Aug 5 12:53:01 2019
New Revision: 274115
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274115&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle new operators with no arguments in DCE.
2019-08-05 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
IMHO not needed for 9.2, glibc will just behave as it used to be ever before
with this header. I'd say let's fix it in on the trunk, let's fix PR80005 and
then we can talk about backporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, lto
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91352
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The uses on the call insn seem okay (i.e., they have mem:BLK for spec):
(call_insn/j 53 52 0 5 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 28 %r28)
(call (mem:SI (symbol_ref/v:SI ("@number") [fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |x86_64-*-* powerpc*-*-*
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt ---
Richi corrected me -- this is not vectorization, but use of SSE on lane zero to
do scalar computation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91240
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91356
Bug ID: 91356
Summary: Poor optimization of calls involving std::unique_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I won't have time soon to work on this further, so if anyone wants to
take it over, reusing or not reusing the above patch, feel free.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380
Mateusz Pusz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mateusz.pusz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
--- Comment #7 from Kostas Sotiropoulos ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Kostas Sotiropoulos from comment #4)
> > Any comments on my questions?
>
> Yes go read the c standard about prompting to int here.
I had chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357
Bug ID: 91357
Summary: _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS rejects possibly-valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88451
--- Comment #5 from Mantas Mikaitis
---
Hello,
I am raising this again. Has anyone had a change to confirm my testcases fail
in the latest version of the compiler?
Kind regards,
Mantas Mikaitis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91311
Konstantin Kharlamov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have no idea which parts are GNU-specific, and which parts power actually
needs. I can just see that your change to include gnu-user.h on non-GNU targets
seems like a design smell, and the requirement to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(assuming something like TARGET_REALLY_GNU existed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
We know that the warning is not so useful as is, that's why it isn't part of
Wall or Wextra, see the other bugs on the topic. It needs people with time and
motivation to work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91358
Bug ID: 91358
Summary: Wrong code with dynamic allocation and optional like
class
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91359
Bug ID: 91359
Summary: GFORTRAN [N RETURN] of .FALSE. logical function X
returns .TRUE. after [if (.not.X) goto N] -
Warning: spaghetti code
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360
Bug ID: 91360
Summary: Implement P1143R2: constinit
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
More specifically:
v.operator[](1); /* maybe okay -- forms a pointer one past end */
Not OK. **Dereferences** a past-the end iterator. That's UB. Go to jail. Go
directly to jail. Do not pass Go. D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91361
Bug ID: 91361
Summary: Implement P1152R4: Deprecating some uses of volatile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91361
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91362
Bug ID: 91362
Summary: program compiled with O3 optimization give different
output than without optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91363
Bug ID: 91363
Summary: Implement P0960R3: Parenthesized initialization of
aggregates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91363
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91356
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The ABI dictates the calling conventions and there's certainly nothing that
libstdc++ can do about it.
In any case, how common is it to have a pointless non-inline baz function which
does nothing but forwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91364
Bug ID: 91364
Summary: Implement P0388R4: Permit conversions to arrays of
unknown bound
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365
Bug ID: 91365
Summary: Implement P1814R0: Class template argument deduction
for alias templates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91364
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91362
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like an aliasing violation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91366
Bug ID: 91366
Summary: Implement P1816R0: Class template argument deduction
for aggregates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91366
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91367
Bug ID: 91367
Summary: Implement P1099R5: using enum
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91367
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91368
Bug ID: 91368
Summary: Implement P1301R4: [[nodiscard("with reason")]]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91368
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Bug ID: 91369
Summary: Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91370
Bug ID: 91370
Summary: Implement P1041R4 and P1139R2: Stronger Unicode
requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91370
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I don't really see what existing warning this might fall under, except perhaps
-Wchar-subscripts because isalpha and friend use the argument as an index into
an array of 257 characters, but that seems like a s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91368
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91371
Bug ID: 91371
Summary: std::bind and bind_front don't work with function with
call convention
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 91340, which changed state.
Bug 91340 Summary: Missing AVX and AVX512 Intrinsics: Zero-Extension
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91340
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91340
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83250
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a-yee at u dot northwestern.edu
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91331
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 91331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91362
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83250
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 91341, which changed state.
Bug 91341 Summary: Missing AVX Intrinsics: load/store u2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91359
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91372
Bug ID: 91372
Summary: [10 Regression] Error: Unclassifiable statement
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91372
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
