[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #11) > Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual > argument at (2) (REAL(8)/REAL(16)) That sounds _much_ better (and is also shorter). When I am

[Bug target/91546] Better solution for VEC_INIT under TARGET_SSE4_1 since PINSRB/PINSRD/PINSRQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91546 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79482] _Static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(x)):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79482 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/81785] Segmentation fault for signed overflow in index expression when -fwrapv is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81785 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > Looks like removing the optimization regresses c-c++-common/restrict-2.c. Why would it do that? I don't see any code mentioning restrict being touched...

[Bug target/91594] Missing horizontal addition auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91594 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There was another bug report about this where SLP does not handle reductions but I can't find it right now.

[Bug target/91594] New: Missing horizontal addition auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91594 Bug ID: 91594 Summary: Missing horizontal addition auto-vectorization Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/91592] `__is_assignable` fails for private assignment operators in certain contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91592 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Using std::is_assignable instead works fine.

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 91361, which changed state. Bug 91361 Summary: Implement P1152R4: Deprecating some uses of volatile https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91361 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/91361] Implement P1152R4: Deprecating some uses of volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91361 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Aug 29 03:11:50 2019 New Revision: 275022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275022=gcc=rev Log: Implement P1152R4: Deprecating some uses of volatile. PR

[Bug c++/91361] Implement P1152R4: Deprecating some uses of volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91361 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/91593] Implicit enum conversions in libgfortran/io/transfer.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91593 --- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch for PR78736 that triggers the warnings: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01938.html Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug libfortran/91593] New: Implicit enum conversions in libgfortran/io/transfer.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91593 Bug ID: 91593 Summary: Implicit enum conversions in libgfortran/io/transfer.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/91592] New: `__is_assignable` fails for private assignment operators in certain contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91592 Bug ID: 91592 Summary: `__is_assignable` fails for private assignment operators in certain contexts Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/91591] Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591 --- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti --- It's gcc 8.2.1 not 7.3.1, sorry for the noise.

[Bug middle-end/88991] missing warning on a strcpy and strlen from a zero-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88991 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79016] missing -Wstringop-overflow= overflowing allocated buffers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED See Also|

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:34:36PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 > > multi.f90:2199:23: > > 2199 |call evolvePDF (x(1), q, f) >

[Bug c/91591] New: Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591 Bug ID: 91591 Summary: Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 46776 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46776=edit Concept patch Here's what a patch could look like. With the test case, it yields multi.f90:2186:23: 2186 |

[Bug target/90175] ambiguous wording "critical attribute" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90175 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, jozefl.gcc at gmail dot com wrote: > As far as I understand, strings which get passed to warning() or error() or > other functions with arguments ending in gmsgid don't

[Bug fortran/91551] [9/10 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.c:4193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91551 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Aug 28 20:36:00 2019 New Revision: 275009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275009=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-28 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91551 *

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 91360, which changed state. Bug 91360 Summary: Implement P1143R2: constinit https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/91360] Implement P1143R2: constinit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91360] Implement P1143R2: constinit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 28 20:31:31 2019 New Revision: 275008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275008=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/91360 - Implement C++20 P1143R2: constinit. * c-common.c

[Bug c++/91590] ICE in : canonical types differ for identical types std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()> and std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91590 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.0 |10.0 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška

[Bug c++/91590] New: ICE in : canonical types differ for identical types std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()> and std::enable_if::ViewConcept<

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91590 Bug ID: 91590 Summary: ICE in : canonical types differ for identical types std::enable_if::ViewConcept< >()> and std::enable_if::ViewConcept<

[Bug c++/91129] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Aug 28 20:16:57 2019 New Revision: 275007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275007=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-28 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91565 *

[Bug fortran/91587] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91587 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/91564] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Aug 28 19:54:23 2019 New Revision: 275005 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275005=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-28 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91564 * check.c

[Bug target/63891] [7 regression] Failure of darwin-weakimport-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 regression] Failure |[7 regression] Failure of

[Bug testsuite/58321] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-strategy-3.c scan-assembler-times memcpy 2 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed for 8.4

[Bug target/63891] [7/8/9 regression] Failure of darwin-weakimport-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891 --- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 28 19:32:18 2019 New Revision: 275003 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275003=gcc=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] BAckport fix PR83891 (darwin-weakimport-3). gcc/testsuite/

[Bug testsuite/58321] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-strategy-3.c scan-assembler-times memcpy 2 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 28 19:27:06 2019 New Revision: 275002 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275002=gcc=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite ] Backport fix for PR58321. gcc/testsuite/ 2019-08-28 Iain

[Bug fortran/91589] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91589 Bug ID: 91589 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2447 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/91588] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2673

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91588 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.

[Bug fortran/91588] New: ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2673

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91588 Bug ID: 91588 Summary: ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2673 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/91587] New: ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91587 Bug ID: 91587 Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2913 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-08-28 2:27 p.m., msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I'm wondering if this test passed on hppa before r273783. Did GCC actually > issue the expecting -Warray-bounds there? Looking at

[Bug fortran/91586] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_derived_vtab, at fortran/class.c:2245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91586 Bug ID: 91586 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_derived_vtab, at fortran/class.c:2245 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/91576] [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 46775 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46775=edit Reduced source files $ gcc -c -flto 5.i -o 5.o && c++ -O2 -flto=16 -shared -o zynaddsubfx 1.ii 2.ii 3.ii 4.ii 5.o ...

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The enhancement has been committed but it doesn't actually resolve the problem. As it turns out, it's caused by VRP not issuing a -Warray-bounds for this case. VRP runs before (not after as I suggested in

[Bug tree-optimization/91351] [9/10 Regression] -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/91584] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug target/90175] ambiguous wording "critical attribute" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90175 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozefl.gcc at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/91585] segfault when calling a non void function without a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91585 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 28 16:43:56 2019 New Revision: 274997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274997=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91457 - inconsistent warning for writing past the end of an

[Bug c++/91585] New: segfault when calling a non void function without a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91585 Bug ID: 91585 Summary: segfault when calling a non void function without a return statement Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91584] New: Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Bug ID: 91584 Summary: Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/80545] option -Wstringop-overflow not recognized by Fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80545 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 28 16:24:38 2019 New Revision: 274996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274996=gcc=rev Log: PR driver/80545 - option -Wstringop-overflow not recognized by Fortran

[Bug testsuite/91549] [10 regression] gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c fails starting with r274925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/91572] [9/10 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem is that the type of the GIMPLE_ASM constraint strings isn't noted by free lang data type discovery. Either: --- gcc/tree.c.jj 2019-08-27 12:26:37.436912167 +0200 +++ gcc/tree.c 2019-08-28

[Bug target/80986] auto keyword variable lost its attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986 Anssi Hannula changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anssi.hannula at bitwise dot fi ---

[Bug lto/91572] [9/10 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Slightly simplified: void foo (char); namespace N { class A { A (); }; A::A () { asm ("" : : "g" (0)); } }

[Bug middle-end/91582] missing hrap overflow detection for strcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91582 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/91582] missing hrap overflow detection for strcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91582 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 46771 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46771=edit A proof-of-concept implementation of the overflow detection. With the attached proof of concept GCC diagnoses the

[Bug middle-end/91582] New: missing hrap overflow detection for strcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91582 Bug ID: 91582 Summary: missing hrap overflow detection for strcpy Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/91581] ICE on usage requiring complete class in expcetion-specification of defaulted method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91581 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91581] New: ICE on usage requiring complete class in expcetion-specification of defaulted method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91581 Bug ID: 91581 Summary: ICE on usage requiring complete class in expcetion-specification of defaulted method Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/91468] Suspicious codes in ipa-prop.c and ipa-cp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91468 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/91468] Suspicious codes in ipa-prop.c and ipa-cp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91468 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Aug 28 14:26:45 2019 New Revision: 274992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274992=gcc=rev Log: [PR 91468] Small fixes in ipa-cp.c and ipa-prop.c 2019-08-28 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/91098] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or field_decl or function_decl or type_decl or template_decl, have using_decl in build_deduction_guide, at cp/pt.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91098 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91577] [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > So it looks like load/store-lanes has actual (aggregate) memory references as > arguments: > > # .MEM_209 = VDEF <.MEM_84> > vect_array.27 =

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug bootstrap/91580] New: [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 Bug ID: 91580 Summary: [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91560] Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91579] New: tailr1 pass creates redundant phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91579 Bug ID: 91579 Summary: tailr1 pass creates redundant phi nodes Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/91578] bool to size_t warning -Wsigned-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91578 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- In other words, this is not specific to bool. The warning is simply too simplistic.

[Bug c++/91578] bool to size_t warning -Wsigned-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91578 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/90613] [10 Regression] Debug info size increase after r271467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91261] noptr-new-declarator does not accept converted constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91261 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90613] [10 Regression] Debug info size increase after r271467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Aug 28 13:36:54 2019 New Revision: 274991 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274991=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/90613] Fix using-decl debug bloat

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 90613, which changed state. Bug 90613 Summary: [10 Regression] Debug info size increase after r271467 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613 What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/91562] [10 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c fails starting with r274933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91562 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/91578] New: bool to size_t warning -Wsigned-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91578 Bug ID: 91578 Summary: bool to size_t warning -Wsigned-conversion Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/91577] [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC (request for -Wenum-conversion to be added)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 Indan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||indan at nul dot nu --- Comment #13 from Indan

[Bug target/91577] [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/91577] New: [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577 Bug ID: 91577 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/90637] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_loop_versioning, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90637 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 28 12:12:20 2019 New Revision: 274989 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274989=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-28 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-05-27

[Bug lto/91576] [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/91570] [10 Regression] ICE in get_range_strlen_dynamic on a conditional of two strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91570 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c/91575] ice: tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91575 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/91576] [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/91573] Vectorization failure for a loop to do multiply-add because SLP loads unnecessarily require permutation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/89544] Argument marshalling incorrectly assumes stack slots are naturally aligned.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89544 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Aug 28 10:20:44 2019 New Revision: 274987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274987=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-28 Bernd Edlinger PR middle-end/89544 *

[Bug libgomp/91530] Several libgomp.*/scan-* tests FAIL without avx_runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91530 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 28 10:13:21 2019 New Revision: 274985 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274985=gcc=rev Log: PR libgomp/91530 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_shl_, vec_shr_): Use

[Bug libgomp/91530] Several libgomp.*/scan-* tests FAIL without avx_runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91530 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 28 10:12:11 2019 New Revision: 274984 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274984=gcc=rev Log: PR libgomp/91530 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_shl_, vec_shr_): Use

[Bug lto/91576] [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/91576] New: [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 Bug ID: 91576 Summary: [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c/91575] New: ice: tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91575 Bug ID: 91575 Summary: ice: tree check: expected integer_cst, have minus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5826 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/91573] Vectorization failure for a loop to do multiply-add because SLP loads unnecessarily require permutation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573 --- Comment #5 from Hao Liu --- Great. It seems really a SLP issue. I've learnt a lot about vectorization, dump info and -march. Thanks for your help.

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- So the fixing rev. makes us not sink stmts into a loop (in this case the invariant division 1./z) so the issue is probably latent. Reduced testcase w/o undefined behavior: subroutine

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Reduced testcase: subroutine h3dmpeval0(iffld,fhs,fhder,z) implicit real *8 (a-h,o-z) complex *16 fhs(0:1),fhder(0:1) complex *16 z call h3dall(1,z,fhs,fhder) end

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed on the branch. internal compiler error: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139 0x121020e poly_int<1u, poly_result::is_poly>::type, poly_coeff_pair_traits::is_poly>::type>::result_kind>::type>

[Bug tree-optimization/91573] Vectorization failure for a loop to do multiply-add because SLP loads unnecessarily require permutation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug lto/91574] [10 Regression] ICE in types_same_for_odr at gcc/ipa-devirt.c:355 since r272037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91574 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/91574] New: [10 Regression] ICE in types_same_for_odr at gcc/ipa-devirt.c:355 since r272037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91574 Bug ID: 91574 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in types_same_for_odr at gcc/ipa-devirt.c:355 since r272037 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

  1   2   >