https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91369, which changed state.
Bug 91369 Summary: Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92098
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68045
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
On my test case the ICE disappeared and I am now having:
gfortran -S gfbug111.f
gfbug111.f:13:6:
13 | function abc_interface(this)
| 1
Error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE ‘abc_interface’ at (1) m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
--- Comment #2 from Angus Gibson ---
Created attachment 47037
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47037&action=edit
Reproducing example (gz)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92100
Bug ID: 92100
Summary: Formatted stream IO irreproducible read with binary
data in file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51088
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Bug ID: 92099
Summary: static_assert of struct template of false_type succeed
with GCC8 but not GCC9
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92098
Bug ID: 92098
Summary: After r262333, the following code cannot be vectorized
on powerpc64le.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92097
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You are missing the point of %v here.
> See ASM_OUTPUT_AVX_PREFIX .
Yes, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92097
Bug ID: 92097
Summary: instrutions only vaild under TARGET_AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91369, which changed state.
Bug 91369 Summary: Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67692, which changed state.
Bug 67692 Summary: [concepts] ICE when using requires in non-concept contexts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67692
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67692
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89943
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Oct 15 00:28:47 2019
New Revision: 276983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/89943
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
From Bug 92092:
The program below gets the following warning message. I think the program is
well-formed (Clang 9.0.0 accepts it without warning).
** Compiler Flags **
-O2 -std=c++17 -Wall
** Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu at kosak dot com
--- Comment #23 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
From Bug 92011:
cat > t.cc <
struct Bar
{
int size_;
Bar( int size )
: size_( size )
{}
};
template
Bar get( T const& val )
{
return Bar( __builtin_strlen(val) );
}
class Foo
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 92011, which changed state.
Bug 92011 Summary: '' may be used uninitialized in this function
with std::optional()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92011
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92011
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84299
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 84299, which changed state.
Bug 84299 Summary: warning: '' may be used uninitialized in this
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84299
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to pj from comment #9)
> The only modification described by the paper (relevant to this case) is the
> requirement that `T_i x[] = {std::forward(t)};` is well formed,
That code gives you a diagn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It does. The array initialization uses a braced-init-list, which is the context
in which narrowing conversions are diagnosed.
Please take this to stackoverflow if you're unclear what the change entails.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92096
Bug ID: 92096
Summary: segmentation fault in 'example_labels' building gcc
trunk on cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92085
--- Comment #4 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted upstream: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01031.html
Thanks,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Reduced testcase. This fixed-form source code.
>
> subroutine hesfcn(n, x, h, ldh)
> integer n,ldh
> double precision x(n), h(ldh)
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92095
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 47034
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47034&action=edit
bug.c
isable-bootstrap
--prefix=/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc-sparc/../gcc-sparc-installed
--disable-multilib --without-isl cross_compiling=yes
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.0 20191014 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92004
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92004
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 14 21:37:34 2019
New Revision: 276972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92004
* array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Is this still a problem? I think Uros's patch fixed the problem
mentioned in comment #9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also
gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c scan-assembler-times \\mrldic\\M 64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67348
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67348, which changed state.
Bug 67348 Summary: [concepts] Constraints, special member functions, and
default/delete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67348
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79591
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 79591, which changed state.
Bug 79591 Summary: [concepts] failure to distinguish overloads from different
namespaces with differing constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79591
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92091
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #0)
> For files included via INCLUDE, the diagnostics printed may be incomplete
> when the included file resides in a different directory. There is no
> problem whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
Bug ID: 92094
Summary: ice in vect_transform_stmt at tree-vect-stmts.c:10921
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Sutton ---
The TS did allow overloading function concepts.
Function concepts have some parsing issues related to TS-style terse notation,
overloading and variadic templates. In particular, there are places where
writin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
Bug ID: 92093
Summary: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr91275.c from
r276410 fails on BE
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92092
Bug ID: 92092
Summary: Spurious warning: '' may be used
uninitialized in this function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92091
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92091
Bug ID: 92091
Summary: Inconsistent diagnostics for INCLUDE vs. #include
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91930
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Oct 14 20:13:49 2019
New Revision: 276968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91930 - ICE with constrained inherited default ctor.
The t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
The regression is because we now inline covered into digits2:
IPA function summary for digits_2/29 inlinable
global time: 1553.078985
self size: 1295
global size: 1295
min size: 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 88329, which changed state.
Bug 88329 Summary: Implement C++20 std concepts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88329
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 88329, which changed state.
Bug 88329 Summary: Implement C++20 std concepts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88329
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85254
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30277
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It also causes these assembler instruction count tests to fail.
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439-1.c scan-assembler-times \\mbl f\\M 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439-1.c scan-assembler-times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
--- Comment #12 from pj at patrickjohnston dot org ---
Intentions aside, the concrete change given at the bottom of the paper doesn't
seem to reflect the non-narrowing conversion constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
--- Comment #2 from Casey Carter ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Is this valid in C++20?
Definitely not: there are no concept functions in C++20.
>
> I think G++ is correct to reject it due to redeclaring C1, C2 etc. as a
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090
Bug ID: 92090
Summary: [10 regression] ICE in
gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with
r276469
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
--- Comment #11 from Marshall Clow ---
With wrapping:
> Proposed Resolution:
> This paper proposes to constrain the variant converting constructor and the
> converting assignment operator to prevent narrowing conversions
> and conversions to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
Marshall Clow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mclow.lists at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80268
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79982
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No crash on current trunk, with an updated example using C++2a syntax:
template concept Void = __is_same_as(T, void);
template
concept my_concept = requires(T t)
{
requires requires (int val) { { t.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87536
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems to be fixed on trunk:
87536.cc:2:13: error: 'X' was not declared in this scope
2 | concept X = X;
| ^
87536.cc:2:16: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
2 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86009
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Trunk now says:
86009.cc:3:11: error: expected 'auto' or 'decltype(auto)' after 'C1'
3 | void f(C0 *) { }
| ^~
86009.cc:3:8: error: expected 'auto' or 'decltype(auto)' after 'C0'
3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85263
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89913
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88515
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92057
--- Comment #9 from pj at patrickjohnston dot org ---
I'm sorry to belabour this, but I don't see how narrowing conversions even has
anything to do with p0608.
The only modification described by the paper (relevant to this case) is the
requiremen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67148
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67148, which changed state.
Bug 67148 Summary: [concepts] Failed concept check when indirecting through a
constrained trait
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67148
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68045
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't get an ICE with current trunk.
I don't think the crash is actually related to concepts, if the same problem
happened for fortran code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68372
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71136
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
Bug ID: 92089
Summary: [concepts] requires-expression results in hard error
during constraint checking
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67225, which changed state.
Bug 67225 Summary: [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result
turns off access checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85806
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I tested it with "concept" not "concept bool" i.e.
template
concept HasCount = requires {
typename ::helper;
};
struct S {
int count = 42;
};
static_assert(!HasCount);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I tested it with "concept" not "concept bool" i.e.
template
concept C = true;
template
requires C
[[nodiscard]] int f(T t) {
return 22;
}
int main() {
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85806
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47031|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92088
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
There are various existing bug reports for ICEs involving VLAs and nested
functions (e.g. 59711, 60085, 69193, 70418). I don't know which might be
related to this one (and even if some are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92083
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note also that glibc does not support being built with a different long
double ABI from the default one. On architectures where more than one
long double format is supported by glibc, eith
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
