https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92085
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92115
Bug ID: 92115
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree,
at gimple-expr.c:577
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92114
Bug ID: 92114
Summary: equivalence in module causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92107
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Oct 15 23:47:47 2019
New Revision: 277023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
genattrtab: Parenthesize expressions correctly (PR92107)
As PR92107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83642
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83657
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86427
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 86427, which changed state.
Bug 86427 Summary: strlen not folded after strcpy into a zeroed-out local array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86427
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85484
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 83674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 83674, which changed state.
Bug 83674 Summary: strcpy folding of small strings defeats strlen optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83674
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83674
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83821
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Updated patch for GCC 10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01038.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81330
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87752
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
Bug ID: 92113
Summary: [8 regression] r276673 causes segfault in
gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92112
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92112
Bug ID: 92112
Summary: fold strlen after strcmp(a, b) == 0
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92111
--- Comment #1 from Jan ---
Only happens with lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92111
Bug ID: 92111
Summary: ICE during GIMPLE pass: dom
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92016
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 92016, which changed state.
Bug 92016 Summary: [10 Regression] excess errors in Wstringop-overflow-17.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92016
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92110
Bug ID: 92110
Summary: too many -Warray-bounds warnings for a loop buffer
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92016
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Oct 15 19:16:51 2019
New Revision: 277008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/92016 - Excess errors in Wstringop-overflow-17.c
gcc/testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92107
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
it doesn't have to be anything to do with C rules, it's simply an incorrect
transcription of lispy arithmetic to C?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|ICE in modify_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #9)
> > Fixed on trunk for GCC 10 by r276132.
>
> I still see different colors in the following error as of r276658:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
20191015
(experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 10.0.0-pre 20191015 (experimental), GMP
version 6.1.2, MPFR version 4.0.2, MPC version 1.1.0, isl version isl-0.21-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
during IPA pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92108
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92016
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92108
Bug ID: 92108
Summary: [10 regression] r276645 triggers excess errors for
gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-17.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92107
Bug ID: 92107
Summary: GCC's insn attribute arithmetic does not follow C
rules
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
template struct A { static constexpr _Tp value = __v;
};
typedef A false_type;
template struct DependentFalse : false_type {};
enum class E;
template void fn1() {
static_assert(DependentFalse::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
--- Comment #5 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Andrew Sutton from comment #3)
> Function concepts have some parsing issues related to TS-style terse
> notation, overloading and variadic templates. In particular, there are
> places where writi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> + tree init;
> + if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (base))
> + && (init = DECL_INITIAL (base)))
> + return maybe_warn_about_returning_address_of_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > 9351 /* When returning address of a structured binding, if the
> > structured
> > 9352 bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
Summary|ICE with structur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #7)
> Having eliminated bb 5, we cannot avoid making bb 6 cold, since this
> would violate CFG integrity: as far as I understand, it's important to
> maintain t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Bug ID: 92106
Summary: ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-addr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86009
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong ---
After adding "auto" for "Concept auto":
template concept C0 = true;
template concept C1 = true;
void f(C0 auto *) { }
template void f(wchar_t *);
We now get:
:5:15: error: template-id 'f' for 'void
f(wchar_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47042&action=edit
gcc10-pr88335.patch
Untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Bug ID: 92105
Summary: [7/8/9/10 Regression] decltype(decltype(decltype))
prints exponential number of fix-it hints
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #23 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Luke Robison from comment #22)
> (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21)
> > (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to
> > "class(levelNN)" definitions
> > (2) Changing f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Oct 15 14:13:01 2019
New Revision: 277000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Fortran] OpenMP+OpenACC: Remove bogus contigous-pointer check
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82019
--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin ---
Updated version of the test (works well on GCC 10):
// { dg-options "-std=c++2a" }
template
concept VectorOperations = requires(T& v, const Data& data) {
v += data;
requires __is_same_as(T&, dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92088
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 47041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47041&action=edit
patch for the inliner
void foo(int n)
{
struct X { int a[n]; } y;
inline struct X __attribute__((always_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Bug ID: 92104
Summary: __builtin_has_attribute in templates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Oct 15 12:44:25 2019
New Revision: 276999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Bill Schmidt
PR target/92093
* gcc.target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92103
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92103
Bug ID: 92103
Summary: constraints not checked on nested class template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92089, which changed state.
Bug 92089 Summary: [concepts] requires-expression results in hard error during
constraint checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81043
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-08-12 00:00:00 |2019-10-15
--- Comment #1 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
From Bug 89301:
The following code compiles however it should not:
template
requires(condition)
using enable_if_t = T;
template>
void foo();
void test() {
foo();
}
Slightly changed example als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 89301, which changed state.
Bug 89301 Summary: [concepts] requires clause on a template alias is ignored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89301
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 11:47:27 2019
New Revision: 276993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91929
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92081
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91975
Bug 91975 depends on bug 92048, which changed state.
Bug 92048 Summary: [10 regression] armeb regression after r276645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 10:47:48 2019
New Revision: 276991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/92048
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think I saw this elswhere.
10088 /* Variables inherited from containing functions should have
10089been lowered by this point. */
10090 if (exp)
10091 context = decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 10:09:10 2019
New Revision: 276987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92094
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92102
Bug ID: 92102
Summary: identical requires-expression not subsumed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79381
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 79381, which changed state.
Bug 79381 Summary: [concepts] Call to template function with type-requirement
unsatisfied not rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79381
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67720
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67217
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67217, which changed state.
Bug 67217 Summary: [concepts] Constraints are ignored when specializing union
templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67217
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
--- Comment #4 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 47040
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47040&action=edit
attachment-110151-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
--- Comment #3 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
MESSAGE NOT DELIVERED
=
There was an issue delivering your message to mar...@trippelsdorf.de.
This is an 5.1.2 Error.
This error typically means:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
--- Comment #1 from 孙晅 ---
Also tried with gcc 10.0.0 201901015 (experimental) and failed to compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
