https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92166
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91979
Kamlesh Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92132
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
Powerpc already support vcond where A and B are in the same mode or the
same size mode. As Richard pointed out, this case requires some packs, it
requires powerpc supports vec_cmpv2dfv2di and vcond_mask_v4siv4si,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Same regression on skylake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
--- Comment #5 from Kamlesh Kumar ---
Fixed on trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92173
Bug ID: 92173
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at
optabs-tree.c:81
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87711
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92128
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes. I constrained strlenopt-80.c to only a subset of the targets where the
optimization has been implemented but forgot to do the same for strlenopt-81.c.
I'm traveling this week but I'll try to remember to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
Bug ID: 92172
Summary: ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang and
ARM-THUMB Procedure Call Standard
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92171
Bug ID: 92171
Summary: accept incorrect access of static constexpr member
when read from a reference
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47079
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47079&action=edit
Untested fix
Does this patch look OK ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #26 from Kevin Shekleton ---
Thanks for educating me on the numbering scheme, Segher. That's helpful info!
Florian - I see you requested the CVE. Will you be working to get the NVD entry
updated with the appropriate affected releases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #1 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47076
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47076&action=edit
current su output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #2 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47077
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47077&action=edit
expected su output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #3 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47078&action=edit
workaround patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
Bug ID: 92170
Summary: Incorrect function names output when using
-fstack-usage on C++
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #25 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There is no 9.2.1 release, and there will not be one either.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html for how our numbering scheme works.
Very briefly, if the second number is 0, or the third number is *no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #24 from Kevin Shekleton ---
Thanks, Segher. You mentioned 9.3 -- does that mean there won't be a 9.2.1
release? If so, will the 'Known to work' field here be updated?
Also, will someone from the GCC team request an update to the NVD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ cat c.c
#include
unsigned char
foo (unsigned long long HxL0, unsigned long long LxH0,
unsigned long long HxL1, unsigned long long LxH1)
{
unsigned char carry;
carry = _addcarry_u64(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83434
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Oct 21 20:19:28 2019
New Revision: 277270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83434 - typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169
Bug ID: 92169
Summary: crash on referring to a local class member by
unqualified name from outside the enclosing function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html/timeline
Sorry, that should be https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #21)
> No future releases for GCC have been announced. Judging from historical
> trends the next (and last) GCC 7 release (7.5) will be in November, GCC 8
> (8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It will be fixed in the next releases of all still supported branches
(that's GCC 7, 8, and 9), and also in the upcoming GCC 10 release of
course.
If you are in a hurry, you can build your own compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 47074
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47074&action=edit
Source code example from Compiler Explorer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168
Bug ID: 92168
Summary: Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92015
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 18:51:43 2019
New Revision: 277267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277267&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92015
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92062
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ODR-use |[9 Regression] ODR-use by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92062
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 21 18:45:45 2019
New Revision: 277266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92062 - ODR-use ignored for static member of class template.
ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248
--- Comment #5 from Bill Long ---
Any progress on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
Kevin Shekleton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kevin.shekleton at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 21 18:22:41 2019
New Revision: 277264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92106 - ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92027
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Sorry about that. I've been working on new C++20 features in the dwindling
stage 1 time, and kept kicking this can down the stage3 road. But hopefully
I'll get to this after posting my aggregate paren init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548
Hannes Hauswedell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92167
Bug ID: 92167
Summary: Poor source location choice for diagnostic in macro
expansion
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
--- Comment #3 from JeanHeyd Meneide ---
Thanks for pinging me about this. I'm at a WG14 Meeting so I won't be able to
get to it immediately, but when I get back I'll get right on fixing!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phdofthehouse at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also these:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-reason.C -std=gnu++2a (test for warnings, line
16)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-reason.C -std=gnu++2a (test for warnings, line
17)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92166
Bug ID: 92166
Summary: [10 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vshift-5.c
starting with r277241
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165
Bug ID: 92165
Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails
starting with r277205
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||meta-bug
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 21 13:43:19 2019
New Revision: 277261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-21 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92162
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
See PR34678 for issues of -frounding-math.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note that if GCC would be standards-conforming here your program would still
need
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
since you are accessing and modifying the floating-point state (where the
pragma has no effect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Steffen Schmidt from comment #3)
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> Just tested using -frounding-math and it seems to fix the issue.
> Sorry, I was not aware of this option, according to GCCs m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Seems to hit 416.gamess as well. Patch in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
--- Comment #12 from David Binderman ---
Scratch my comment. Wrong bug report. Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Another test case seems to be:
double *a;
b() {
int c, d = 1;
for (; c < b; c++)
for (; c < b; c++)
if (a[c])
d = 0;
if (d)
e();
}
-O3 required for this case. Bug seems to star
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
tree-ssa-dse.c assumes need_eh_cleanup bitmap (which is static) is initialized
at the start of the pass and handled at the end.
So, do we need to add functions (init and fini) which ifcvt can call, or just
no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92160
--- Comment #2 from Pom ---
Created attachment 47073
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47073&action=edit
test code and makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92160
--- Comment #1 from Pom ---
full source code:
#define TLS __thread
TLS int oldname = 7;
extern TLS int newname __attribute__((alias("oldname")));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92151
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The originally reported issue fixed for 9.3+ too. Not really sure if it is a
good idea to backport the shift and array ref changes, those are quite
invasive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.2.1
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164
--- Comment #3 from Steffen Schmidt ---
Thanks for the quick reply.
Just tested using -frounding-math and it seems to fix the issue.
Sorry, I was not aware of this option, according to GCCs manual it is
experimental.
Please correct me if I'm w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1 |[7/8 Regression] -msse4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 9.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.2.1
Summary|[8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92056
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:49:18 2019
New Revision: 277259
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277259&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-10-17 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87752
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:48:34 2019
New Revision: 277258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-10-17 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:48:00 2019
New Revision: 277257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277257&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-10-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:46:21 2019
New Revision: 277255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-10-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:47:09 2019
New Revision: 277256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-10-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90543
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:45:27 2019
New Revision: 277254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:44:53 2019
New Revision: 277253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:43:16 2019
New Revision: 277252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277252&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019
New Revision: 277251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019
New Revision: 277251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:41:40 2019
New Revision: 277250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019
New Revision: 277251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:40:48 2019
New Revision: 277249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-07 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91106
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019
New Revision: 277248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91105
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019
New Revision: 277248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019
New Revision: 277248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91632
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:04 2019
New Revision: 277247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:38:37 2019
New Revision: 277246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:37:41 2019
New Revision: 277245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:36:36 2019
New Revision: 277244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91617
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:36:36 2019
New Revision: 277244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91401
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:35:09 2019
New Revision: 277243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-08-09 Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo