[Bug tree-optimization/92203] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92202] [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92202 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|other

[Bug testsuite/92199] [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C fails after r277300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug debug/92204] Confusing GDB output for an optimized C program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92204 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 --- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Untested fix. Building LibreOffice (from which I had distilled the reproducer) works fine for me again with that patch. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/88466] [C++17] Support std::hardware_destructive_interference_size and std:: hardware_constructive_interference_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88466 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/87142] Aliasing issue with overloaded assignment and allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87142 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:09:55AM +, mscfd at gmx dot net wrote: > > --- Comment #9 from martin --- > Is this possibly related to bug 87142? > Certainly appears that way. If I add a 'print *, ">"//tr

[Bug target/91766] -fvisibility=hidden during -fpic still uses GOT indirection on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kamlesh Kumar from comment #9) > This fixes it. > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c > index 2e73f3515bb..6fb87d5f49f 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/a

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mscfd at gmx dot net --- Comment #9 from martin

[Bug target/91766] -fvisibility=hidden during -fpic still uses GOT indirection on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/90205] Wformat-signedness detects %d and suggests %d fixit hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90205 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #8) > Maybe "argument 2 has type 'double' (promoted from 'float')"? Yes, that seems better to me, at least...

[Bug debug/92204] New: Confusing GDB output for an optimized C program

posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 10.0.0 20191023 (experimental) [trunk revision 277309] (GCC) $ gdb-trunk -v GNU gdb (GDB) 9.0.50.20191023-git Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> T

[Bug ipa/92074] [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 92074, which changed state. Bug 92074 Summary: [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug tree-optimization/92203] New: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Bug ID: 92203 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c

[Bug target/91927] -mstrict-align doesn't prevent unaligned accesses at -O2 and -O3 on AARCH64 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Posted updated patch upstream: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01702.html Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug c++/91427] Implement P1825R0, Merged wording for P0527R1 and P1155R3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|9.3 Summary|[10 Regression] "

[Bug c++/92201] [10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug other/92202] New: [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92202 Bug ID: 92202 Summary: [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/92200] Shared pointer not destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01686.html

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 --- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: qinzhao Date: Wed Oct 23 18:12:39 2019 New Revision: 277344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277344&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 qing zhao PR gcov-profile/91971

[Bug c++/91548] [10 Regression] Regression in constexpr evaluation of std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/92201] [10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug c++/92201] New: "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sbergman at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- With recent trunk: > $ gcc/trunk/inst/bin/g++ --version > g++ (GCC) 10.0.0 20191023 (experimental) > Copyright (C)

[Bug c/92172] ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172 --- Comment #6 from Wilco --- (In reply to Seth LaForge from comment #5) > GCC 8: > push{r7, lr} > sub sp, sp, #8 > add r7, sp, #0 > str r0, [r7, #4] > ... > > Clang 9: > push{

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Oct 23 17:42:11 2019 New Revision: 277342 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277342&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91369 Implement P0784R7 changes to allocation and construction T

[Bug libstdc++/92200] Shared pointer not destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200 --- Comment #1 from Vanshil Shah --- Created attachment 47096 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47096&action=edit preprocessed file that triggers the bug

[Bug libstdc++/92200] New: Shared pointer not destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200 Bug ID: 92200 Summary: Shared pointer not destroyed Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c/92172] ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172 --- Comment #5 from Seth LaForge --- Richard: > No it doesn't. The AAPCS for AArch32 makes no reference to a frame pointer, > so there is no portable way defined for walking a frame other than by using > dwarf records or C++ unwinding descriptio

[Bug c++/92197] String Concatenation, Commutativity, and Side-Effect Inducing Functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/92199] [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C fails after r277300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/92199] New: [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C fails after r277300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199 Bug ID: 92199 Summary: [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C fails after r277300 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91886] [10 regression] powerpc64 impossible constraint in asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886 --- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- note that "ws" is now supported by clang, but "wa" is not.

[Bug c++/92197] String Concatenation, Commutativity, and Side-Effect Inducing Functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197 --- Comment #1 from Louis Jenkins --- Can confirm that on Godbolt, this bug occurs _only_ with GCC, not with clang, nor icc, or ellcc. This bug has occurred since GCC version 4.7.3, presumably is still occurring in GCC version 10.0 (or whatever t

[Bug c++/92194] maybe-uninitialized false positive with c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- With -Wsystem-headers you also get the warning in C++17 (and it is actually a bit more informative, at least it says where it is used).

[Bug c/92167] Poor source location choice for diagnostic in macro expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92167 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Church --- A similar problem occurs when passing the wrong number of arguments to a function which has been renamed with a macro -- the diagnostic is associated with the renaming macro instead of the original source lin

[Bug target/91886] [10 regression] powerpc64 impossible constraint in asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886 --- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- seems to be broken since r271916

[Bug ipa/92074] [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Oct 23 14:45:24 2019 New Revision: 277333 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277333&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/92074 * params.def (inline-heuristics-hint-percent)

[Bug c++/92194] maybe-uninitialized false positive with c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/92198] error "different exception specifier" with forward referring noexcept condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92198 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/92198] New: error "different exception specifier" with forward referring noexcept condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92198 Bug ID: 92198 Summary: error "different exception specifier" with forward referring noexcept condition Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/88335] Implement P1073R3, C++20 immediate functions (consteval).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47032|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/92197] New: String Concatenation, Commutativity, and Side-Effect Inducing Functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197 Bug ID: 92197 Summary: String Concatenation, Commutativity, and Side-Effect Inducing Functions Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/92195] [7/8 Regression/Latent] 'libgomp.c/pr90811.c:29:1: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set' ('internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/92195] New: [7/8 Regression/Latent] 'libgomp.c/pr90811.c:29:1: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set' ('internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195 Bug ID: 92195 Summary: [7/8 Regression/Latent] 'libgomp.c/pr90811.c:29:1: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set' ('internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed')

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton. Added: branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c - copied unchan

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92131 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|9.1.0

[Bug middle-end/92195] [7/8 Regression/Latent] 'libgomp.c/pr90811.c:29:1: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set' ('internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Cherry-picking the PR90811 follow-up r272181 does not fix this.

[Bug fortran/92196] New: Regression: -fno-automatic affects local variables in subroutines/function declared with recursive keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92196 Bug ID: 92196 Summary: Regression: -fno-automatic affects local variables in subroutines/function declared with recursive keyword Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/92111] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dom

-fno-openmp -fno-openacc -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fuse-ld=gold -fltrans @/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtgui-5.12.5/temp/ccDJPKT5 -o libQt5Gui.so.5.12.5.ltrans12.s GNU GIMPLE (Gentoo 10.0.0_pre) version 10.0.0-pre 20191023 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C

[Bug c/92172] ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- (In reply to Seth LaForge from comment #2) > Good point on frame pointers vs a frame chain for unwinding. I'm looking for > the unwindable frame chain. > > Wilco: > > Why does this matter? Well as your examples show

[Bug c++/87768] [8 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19002 when using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768 --- Comment #6 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de --- I can confirm that this works from 9 and up. Is there any chance to backport it to 8? In the ticket it says `Target Milestone: 8.4`, does that mean there will be a 8.4 release tha

[Bug tree-optimization/92185] ICE when perform condition reduction vectorization on uchar ind var

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 23 12:41:49 2019 New Revision: 277322 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277322&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/65930

[Bug debug/90231] ivopts causes iterator in the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 23 12:38:03 2019 New Revision: 277321 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277321&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/90231 * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (get_debug_comput

[Bug middle-end/40135] using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 Bug 71002 depends on bug 40135, which changed state. Bug 40135 Summary: using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/92184] [ASAN] errors in bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92184 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Problem seems to have gone away at revision 277300.

[Bug d/91916] Maybe a dead code in socket.d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91916 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- @Iain: ping

[Bug lto/91772] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4412 since r259749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91772 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/91772] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4412 since r259749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91772 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019 New Revision: 277319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/91812] [7 Regression] GCC ignores volatile modifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019 New Revision: 277319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug debug/91887] [7/8 Regression] -fdebug-types-section ICE building chromium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019 New Revision: 277319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/91945] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5837 since r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91945 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47093 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47093&action=edit Reduced test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/91945] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5837 since r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91945 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91944] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug fortran/91944] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156 since r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91944] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156 since r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47092 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47092&action=edit Reduced test-case

[Bug fortran/91944] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156 since r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Created attachment 47092 [details] > Reduced test-case Sorry, wrong bug.

[Bug fortran/92191] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191 --- Comment #7 from John Watts --- (gdb) backtrace #0 0x0001004fcf20 in ?? () #1 0x0001004fd4c9 in ?? () #2 0x0001004fd6d0 in ?? () #3 0x00010050aac4 in ?? () #4 0x0001004983af in ?? () #5 0x0001004df32b in ?? () #6

[Bug c++/92194] New: maybe-uninitialized false positive with c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194 Bug ID: 92194 Summary: maybe-uninitialized false positive with c++2a Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Oct 23 12:16:28 2019 New Revision: 277318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277318&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r276178 2019-10-23 Martin Liska Backport from mainli

[Bug c++/92193] New: Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 Bug ID: 92193 Summary: Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: d

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Oct 23 12:12:57 2019 New Revision: 277317 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277317&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r276141 2019-10-23 Martin Liska Backport from mainli

[Bug c++/55722] failed static_assert won't trigger a second time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55722 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80485] rejects-valid: constexpr static_cast of pointer-to-member-function to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eugene at hutorny dot in.ua --- Commen

[Bug c++/67245] static_assert on inline function gives an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67245 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92191] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191 --- Comment #6 from John Watts --- e:\ISOPERF\SRC>gfortran -g -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok -wrapper gdb,--args -c fosyan.f GNU gdb (GDB) (Cygwin 8.1.1-1) 8.1.1 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: G

[Bug libstdc++/92192] Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when compiled with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92192 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Building libstdc++ with -flto is not really supported - we apply a fixed symbol export set which isn't tuned for its effects. I remember recent fixes in this area though.

[Bug tree-optimization/92039] [10 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds warnings building 32-bit glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug fortran/92191] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Replace: gdb, --args with: gdb,--args

[Bug tree-optimization/92111] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92111 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton. Added: branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c - copied unchan

[Bug fortran/92191] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191 --- Comment #4 from John Watts --- As directed: gfortran -g  -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok -wrapper gdb, --args -c fosyan.f gfortran: error: unrecognized command line option '--args' Regards, John Watts john_wa...@isoparix.co

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm not sure it is what we want though, because it will mean more unnecessary compile time work, -fnon-call-exceptions is not on by default for most languages and even if it is, not all stores can throw.

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton. Added: branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c - copied unchan

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog t

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues that static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 81669, which changed state. Bug 81669 Summary: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/81669] trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81669] trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Oct 23 11:29:10 2019 New Revision: 277313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277313&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Initialize a field in fibonacci_node. 2019-10-23 Martin Liska

[Bug tree-optimization/92039] [10 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds warnings building 32-bit glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | CC|

  1   2   >