[Bug libobjc/67455] Inheriting from Object (with GNU runtime) doesn't provide alloc, init, or new, rendering methods useless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/92170] Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Is there a reason why -fstack-usage doesn't output mangled name ? Yes, the output was supposed to be human-readable, that's why the location of the function is also output. > Wouldn't it better if it was

[Bug fortran/91863] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Oct 28 07:33:29 2019 New Revision: 277502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor PR

[Bug target/77918] S390: Floating point comparisons don't raise invalid for unordered operands.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77918 stli at linux dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ipa/85960] -fipa-pta and ifunc are incompatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92228] [10 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:5730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction Status|UNCO

[Bug c/92230] Proposal to have builtin underflow detection function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92230 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/92231] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Oct 28 08:19:56 2019 New Revision: 277504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277504&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/92242 * ipa-fnsummary.c (ipa_merge_fn_summary_afte

[Bug c/92230] Proposal to have builtin underflow detection function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92230 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Overflow for sub works both directions. Unless I am misunderstanding what you are asking.

[Bug tree-optimization/92233] missed optimisation for multiplication when it's known that at least one of the arguments is 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92244] vectorized loop updating 2 copies of the same pointer (for in-place reversal cross in the middle)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92244 --- Comment #4 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #1) > > On AArch64 (with gcc8.2), we see a similar effect, more instructions in the > > loop. And an indexed addressing mod

[Bug ipa/92234] [10 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed (profiled lto) on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |ipa Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/92235] [10 Regression] ICE in host_detect_local_cpu, segfault (profiled lto) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug target/92237] [x86] Missed optimisation opportunity with bit tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92239] [10 Regression] ICE in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org V

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/92241] [10 Regression] ice in vect_mark_pattern_st mts, at tree-vect-patterns.c:5175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Happends during in-tree build of ISL. Did you do the setup with > ./contrib/download_prerequesites? Yes, I setup with ./contrib/download_prerequesites I

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug fortran/92208] [9/10 Regression] internal compile error, character array of dynamic length returned from function and passed to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92208 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So after the fix you'll see > ./cc1 -quiet xx.c -fgimple xx.c: In function ‘foo’: xx.c:5:1: error: ENTRY_BLOCK has IL associated with it 5 | } | ^ during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg xx.c:5:1: internal

[Bug middle-end/92250] New: valgrind: ira_traverse_loop_tree – Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250 Bug ID: 92250 Summary: valgrind: ira_traverse_loop_tree – Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/85947] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- OK, I'll finally blacklist all GIMPLE testcases altogether as I already do w/ RTL ones. It didn't seem right to me that some GIMPLE testcases yield ICE when compiled w/ -fno-gimple, but if that's by design,

[Bug ipa/92251] New: [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251 Bug ID: 92251 Summary: [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/92250] valgrind: ira_traverse_loop_tree – Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/91863] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Oct 28 09:36:27 2019 New Revision: 277505 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277505&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor Bac

[Bug fortran/91863] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/92189] Fortran-written bind(C) function with allocatable argument does not update C descriptor on exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- The attached test case is gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind-c-intent-out.f90 which is part of the committed to fix PR 91863. Due to this PR, the committed test case uses 'dg-do compile' instead of 'dg-do run'.

[Bug target/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #9 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Author: guojiufu Date: Mon Oct 28 09:46:15 2019 New Revision: 277506 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277506&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [rs6000] PR70010, avoid no-vsx function to be inlined to vsx function In

[Bug libstdc++/92224] Set: Can't be created a set with const template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92224 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's undefined, so the implementation is not required to give an error. To quote the standard: Undefined behavior may be expected when this document omits any explicit definition of behavior or when a prog

[Bug tree-optimization/92252] New: [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_stmt_to_vectorize)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252 Bug ID: 92252 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_stmt_to_vectorize) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug rtl-optimization/92007] [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: EH edge crosses section boundary in bb 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007 --- Comment #17 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: iii Date: Mon Oct 28 10:04:31 2019 New Revision: 277507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277507&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Move jump threading before reload r266734 has introduced a new ins

[Bug tree-optimization/92241] [10 Regression] ice in vect_mark_pattern_st mts, at tree-vect-patterns.c:5175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85947] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 > > --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- > OK, I'll finally blacklist all GIMPLE testca

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 > > --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > >

[Bug tree-optimization/92252] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_stmt_to_vectorize)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8) > Will you do the fix? I have it in testing.

[Bug ipa/92251] [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug ipa/92251] [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug middle-end/92250] valgrind: ira_traverse_loop_tree – Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 Elad Lahav changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e2lahav at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Oct 28 11:29:43 2019 New Revision: 277510 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277510&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/92225 * config/i386/sse.md (REDUC_SSE_S

[Bug c++/88165] error: default member initializer for 'A::B::m' required before the end of its enclosing class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165 Toni Neubert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/88165] error: default member initializer for 'A::B::m' required before the end of its enclosing class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/92154] new glibc breaks arm bootstrap due to libsanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88165] error: default member initializer for 'A::B::m' required before the end of its enclosing class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Maybe we need more delayed parsing here.

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 28 12:25:09 2019 New Revision: 277512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277512&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28 Richard Biener PR c/92249 * gimple-parse

[Bug c/92249] ICE in c_parser_gimple_compound_statement w/ GIMPLE testcases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Status|ASSIG

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92228] [10 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:5730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug ipa/92253] New: [10 Regression] 25% regression in 465.tonto with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92253 Bug ID: 92253 Summary: [10 Regression] 25% regression in 465.tonto with LTO Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug ipa/92253] [10 Regression] 25% regression in 465.tonto with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization,

[Bug rtl-optimization/92007] [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: EH edge crosses section boundary in bb 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007 --- Comment #18 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: iii Date: Mon Oct 28 13:09:54 2019 New Revision: 277515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Move jump threading before reload r266734 has introduced a new ins

[Bug tree-optimization/92241] [10 Regression] ice in vect_mark_pattern_st mts, at tree-vect-patterns.c:5175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92241] [10 Regression] ice in vect_mark_pattern_st mts, at tree-vect-patterns.c:5175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 28 13:42:03 2019 New Revision: 277516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92241

[Bug tree-optimization/92252] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_stmt_to_vectorize)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92228] [10 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:5730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Fixed, but leaving open for a possibly new testcase.

[Bug tree-optimization/92252] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_stmt_to_vectorize)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 28 13:43:49 2019 New Revision: 277517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277517&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92252

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Elad Lahav from comment #4) > Created attachment 47119 [details] > Proposed implementation of naked functions for aarch64 > > The change is quite simple (see the proposed patch). I hope it ca

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r277504 PASS for me. Thank you

[Bug target/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Author: guojiufu Date: Mon Oct 28 13:55:41 2019 New Revision: 277518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277518&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [rs6000] PR70010, avoid no-vsx function to be inlined to vsx function In

[Bug ipa/92254] New: [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254 Bug ID: 92254 Summary: [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Oct 28 14:16:50 2019 New Revision: 277520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277520&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/92225 * config/i386/sse.md (REDUC_SSE_S

[Bug ipa/92254] [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/92225] ice in gen_smaxv2di3, at config/i386/sse.md:12225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org| Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug target/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #11 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Author: guojiufu Date: Mon Oct 28 14:23:26 2019 New Revision: 277521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277521&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline PR target/70010 * gcc.tar

[Bug fortran/91863] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Tobias, It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours? Cheers Paul On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:34, burnus

[Bug target/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #12 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Author: guojiufu Date: Mon Oct 28 14:30:05 2019 New Revision: 277523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277523&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline PR target/70010 * gcc.tar

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #6 from Elad Lahav --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > Patches need to be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org. Note, if you've not > contributed to gcc before you'll also need to sort out a copyright > assignment for the

[Bug c/23577] spurious warnings about unhandled cases in switches (need VRP and control flow in front-end)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23577 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- The problem with the naked attribute is usually it is not well defined. For things like interrupts functions and interrupt returns, there is always plain .s files. Interrupts usually save/restore all registe

[Bug fortran/91863] [9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #5) > It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch > tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours? Yes, fine with me. (I

[Bug middle-end/91272] [SVE] Use fully-masked loops for CLASTB reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91272 --- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Mon Oct 28 14:50:58 2019 New Revision: 277524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277524&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #8 from Elad Lahav --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > The problem with the naked attribute is usually it is not well defined. For > things like interrupts functions and interrupt returns, there is always > plain .s fil

[Bug c++/92255] New: No "did you mean" hint for specialization of unrecognised variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92255 Bug ID: 92255 Summary: No "did you mean" hint for specialization of unrecognised variable template Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diag

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Mon Oct 28 15:01:24 2019 New Revision: 277525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/92256] New: [10 regression] error in gcc.dg/unroll-and-jam.c after r277501

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92256 Bug ID: 92256 Summary: [10 regression] error in gcc.dg/unroll-and-jam.c after r277501 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/92257] New: AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257 Bug ID: 92257 Summary: AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/92257] AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug tree-optimization/92228] [10 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:5730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- Done. int ze, r2; int i0[2]; void np (int ch) { while (ch < 1) { if (i0[ch] != 0) ze = r2 = ch; ++ch; } } % gcc-10.0.0-alpha20191027 -O3 -c bisb9gfl.c during GIMPLE pass: ve

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- So can be closed now?

[Bug c++/88337] Implement P1002R1, P1327R1, P1330R0, C++20 relaxations of constexpr restrictions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/92258] New: [10 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid %-code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92258 Bug ID: 92258 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid %-code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/92257] AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Albrekht --- Thank you for your prompt reply. I missed that __m512i_u type exists to avoid alignment requirement. PS. I guess you meant 512 bit? Regards, Ilya

[Bug target/92257] AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ilya Albrekht from comment #2) > PS. I guess you meant 512 bit? Yes I mean 512bit or 64 byte.

[Bug lto/92259] New: ICE with lto and auto-profile cp/mangle.c:1641 write_closure_type_name

14' '-fno-excepti ons' '-fno-threadsafe-statics' '-fvisibility-inlines-hidden' '-c' '-shared-libgcc' /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.0.0-pre/cc1plus -fpreprocessed hb-ot-layout.ii -quiet -dumpbase hb-ot-layout.cc -march=skylake -auxbas

[Bug lto/92259] ICE with lto and auto-profile cp/mangle.c:1641 write_closure_type_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92259 --- Comment #1 from Jan --- Created attachment 47121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47121&action=edit gcov file

[Bug tree-optimization/92229] Optimization makes it impossible to read overflow flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92229 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, arieltorti14 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92229 > > --- Comment #2 from Ariel Torti --- > (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.co

[Bug fortran/91926] assumed rank optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 28 18:28:48 2019 New Revision: 277531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28  Paul Thomas   Backport from trunk PR fortran/91

[Bug sanitizer/92247] ‘__NR_open’ was not declared in this scope libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux compilation failed on ubuntu 18.04 WSL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS is not defined yet but I think Linux upstream removed the define for __NR_open as it is a legacy system call only there for backwards compability for old binaries.

[Bug fortran/91926] assumed rank optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/92247] ‘__NR_open’ was not declared in this scope libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux compilation failed on ubuntu 18.04 WSL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also this seems like it should be filed/fixed upstream first.

[Bug lto/41526] gimple bytecode streams are not portable between different hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- My previous comment was that the *patch* for that old bug was a host-dependency, so the bug having been closed as fixed suggests that the issue may be present in the source tree, not that t

[Bug target/77918] S390: Floating point comparisons don't raise invalid for unordered operands.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77918 --- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The glibc patch does not need to wait for GCC 10 to be released (we're not concerned with old development versions of GCC in glibc, __GNUC_PREREQ (10, 0) can be used for anything fixed in

  1   2   >