[Bug c++/89640] [9 Regression] g++ chokes on lambda with __attribute__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 2 06:53:53 2019 New Revision: 277741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89640 * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Do

[Bug other/92329] New: Undocumented option -f{,no-}allocation-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92329 Bug ID: 92329 Summary: Undocumented option -f{,no-}allocation-dce Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] New: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 Bug ID: 92328 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c

[Bug c++/92327] New: insufficient diagnosis on the incompatibility type of auto template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92327 Bug ID: 92327 Summary: insufficient diagnosis on the incompatibility type of auto template parameter Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 1 23:34:21 2019 New Revision: 277735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277735&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/92314 * configure.ac: Don't look for omp-devi

[Bug c++/88335] Implement P1073R3, C++20 immediate functions (consteval).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 1 23:28:20 2019 New Revision: 277733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277733&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88335 - Implement P1073R3: Immediate functions c-family/

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 1 23:26:17 2019 New Revision: 277732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277732&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91369 - Implement P0784R7: constexpr new * cp-tree

[Bug c/92326] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/92326] New: wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Bug ID: 92326 Summary: wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --- Both Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C pass with the Darwin cross now. Both the Darwin cross and a native GCC 10 now also issue the same warnings for the test case in comment #7. With the cross I s

[Bug c++/69698] [meta-bug] flexible array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698 Bug 69698 depends on bug 91463, which changed state. Bug 91463 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 What|Remove

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 91463, which changed state. Bug 91463 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 What|Remove

[Bug middle-end/91463] missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug target/92322] Compilation (of gdrcopy) in cloud environments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92322 afernandez at odyhpc dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/92312] [10 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow storing into a trailing array backed by larger buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92312 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92311] Fortran and OpenMP use_device_ptr and OpenACC attach_ptr/dettach_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92311 --- Comment #4 from Nichols A. Romero --- Jakub, My apologies for wasting your time. I had asked a colleague to help me put a simplified test case together, after closer inspection it did not actually reproduce the use case from the larger scien

[Bug fortran/92311] Fortran and OpenMP use_device_ptr and OpenACC attach_ptr/dettach_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92311 Nichols A. Romero changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47152|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/91679] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a local buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 91679, which changed state. Bug 91679 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a local buffer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/86487] [7/8 Regression] insn does not satisfy its constraints on arm big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Nov 1 22:37:04 2019 New Revision: 277729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277729&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2019-02-20 Andre Vieira

[Bug c++/17314] Error message wrongly shows declared rather than inherited access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314 kamilek1313 at poczta dot fm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamilek1313 at poczta dot f

[Bug rtl-optimization/92281] Inconsistent canonicalization of (minus (minus A B) C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92281 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > What I've shown is equivalent to (minus (minus (A) (B)) (C)), which is what > combine produces today. Are you saying that the documentation disagrees on

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 1 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 277728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91679 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in

[Bug tree-optimization/92323] bogus -Warray-bounds after unrolling despite __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92323 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 1 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 277728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91679 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a

[Bug c/91463] missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 1 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 277728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91679 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a

[Bug middle-end/91679] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a local buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 1 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 277728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91679 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a

[Bug middle-end/92312] bogus -Wstringop-overflow storing into a trailing array backed by larger buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92312 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 1 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 277728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91679 - missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92325] -fdump-tree-original and char(kind=4) initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92325 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/92325] New: -fdump-tree-original and char(kind=4) initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92325 Bug ID: 92325 Summary: -fdump-tree-original and char(kind=4) initializations Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c/92324] New: ice in expand_direct_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92324 Bug ID: 92324 Summary: ice in expand_direct_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:2890 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/92323] bogus -Warray-bounds after unrolling despite __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92323 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/92323] New: bogus -Warray-bounds after unrolling despite __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92323 Bug ID: 92323 Summary: bogus -Warray-bounds after unrolling despite __builtin_unreachable Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/92121] Error using GCC 4.9.4 -- arch/x86/Makefile:166: *** CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||afernandez at odyhpc dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/92322] Compilation (of gdrcopy) in cloud environments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug target/92322] Compilation (of gdrcopy) in cloud environments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug c++/92322] New: Compilation (of gdrcopy) in cloud environments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92322 Bug ID: 92322 Summary: Compilation (of gdrcopy) in cloud environments Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug fortran/92321] New: GCC 9.2.0 ICE: fexternal-blas with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321 Bug ID: 92321 Summary: GCC 9.2.0 ICE: fexternal-blas with optimization Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug d/87818] D runtime does not build on FreeBSD.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87818 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug d/87818] D runtime does not build on FreeBSD.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87818 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- > Hi, > this patch triggers another confusion in ipa-devirt. > It tries to build type inheritnace graph but since D frotnend produces > only functio

[Bug c++/92320] New: Constexpr function pointer derived from lambda is not accepted as template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92320 Bug ID: 92320 Summary: Constexpr function pointer derived from lambda is not accepted as template parameter Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug fortran/92113] [8/9/10 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|middle-end

[Bug fortran/90988] Wrong error message with variables named "PUBLIC*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90988 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Nov 1 16:27:38 2019 New Revision: 277714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277714&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-11-01 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/90988

[Bug lto/70929] [7/8/9/10 regression] Cross-module inlining for functions having argument passed by reference is no longer working.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor --- I sent a more detailed analysis of the behavior of gimple_call_types_likely_match_p and the idea from comment #5 along with a patch that mostly removes the predicate to the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/92113] [8/9/10 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- I had thought that this patch Index: trans-decl.c === --- trans-decl.c(Revision 277486) +++ trans-decl.c(Arbeitskopie) @@ -1911

[Bug c++/92319] New: Macro expansion using the __VAOPT__ construct is incorrect when the variadic argument expands to nothing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92319 Bug ID: 92319 Summary: Macro expansion using the __VAOPT__ construct is incorrect when the variadic argument expands to nothing Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1

[Bug c++/92236] [concepts] Explain non-satisfaction in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92236 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 47153 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47153&action=edit sketch of late evaulation something like this. not continuing to work on it.

[Bug c++/92236] [concepts] Explain non-satisfaction in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92236 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Andrew Sutton from comment #2) > This is tricky because the condition reduces to true/false before the static > assertion evaluates it. We could introduce a new binary expression that > stores th

[Bug c++/92236] [concepts] Explain non-satisfaction in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92236 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another idea would be to add a new flag which chooses between brief and verbose explanations of satisfaction failure during overload resolution. By default just say that an overload isn't viable because typ

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- @Jakub: Can you please take a look?

[Bug target/92287] Mismatches in the calling convention for zero sized types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92287 --- Comment #10 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- (In reply to gnzlbg from comment #9) > > @josef > > > The MSP430 ABI is here: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534/slaa534.pdf > Although confusingly that document is wrong regarding passing structures and

[Bug c++/83083] c++2a concepts without -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83083 Hannes Hauswedell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/90589] In Fedora 30 ps hangs using address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589 --- Comment #9 from mccannd at uk dot ibm.com --- Still failing when I try the same in Fedora 31.

[Bug tree-optimization/92317] [10 Regression] ICE in slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:960 since r277569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92317 --- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Actually upon a second look it has nothing to do with that, that get_loop_body doesn't make much sense there anyways. I believe that should have just been 'loop' as slpeel_tree_duplicate_loop_to_e

[Bug rtl-optimization/92281] Inconsistent canonicalization of (minus (minus A B) C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92281 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2) > > Yes, but since > > (A - B) - C = A - B - C = A - C - B = (A - C) - B > > we can clearly swap the ord

[Bug tree-optimization/92317] [10 Regression] ICE in slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:960 since r277569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92317 --- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. It seems get_loop_copy is returning NULL. I'm looking into it.

[Bug fortran/92318] New: Nondeterministic ICE with -mcmodel=large -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92318 Bug ID: 92318 Summary: Nondeterministic ICE with -mcmodel=large -O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug ipa/92074] [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin --- Cl

[Bug testsuite/92127] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c fails after r276645 on power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92127 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'd suggest once you build the --enable-as-accelerator-for= compiler, install it in whatever temporary location you pick and then use nvptx-none=/path/to/that so that it can find it.

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug bootstrap/92316] [10 Regression] --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none leads to build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92316 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/92317] New: [10 Regression] ICE in slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:960 since r277569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92317 Bug ID: 92317 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:960 since r277569 Product: gcc Version: 10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/92317] [10 Regression] ICE in slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:960 since r277569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92317 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92316] [10 Regression] --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none leads to build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92316 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Dup of PR92314? The offloading compiler needs to be installed, when using the nvptx-none=/path form it needs to be under that /path root.

[Bug bootstrap/92316] New: [10 Regression] --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none leads to build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92316 Bug ID: 92316 Summary: [10 Regression] --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none leads to build error Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/92316] [10 Regression] --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none leads to build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92316 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92301] [10 Regression] Wrong vectorizer code since r277566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92301 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction |wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Thank for clarification. Sorry for noise

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- I use system compiler for bootstrap: gcc9/Fedora31 Did I understood you correctly: I need offloading compiler installed after r277662 if I say '--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none' ? so invalid PR?

[Bug libgomp/92315] [10 regression] libgomp.c/pr58392.c and several others FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92315 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libgomp/92315] New: [10 regression] libgomp.c/pr58392.c and several others FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92315 Bug ID: 92315 Summary: [10 regression] libgomp.c/pr58392.c and several others FAIL Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libgomp/92315] [10 regression] libgomp.c/pr58392.c and several others FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92315 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug bootstrap/92314] New: [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 Bug ID: 92314 Summary: [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h' Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug testsuite/92310] New test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c introduced in r277659 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92310 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|powerpc64*-linux-gnu, |

[Bug testsuite/92127] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c fails after r276645 on power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92127 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- Author: linkw Date: Fri Nov 1 07:11:12 2019 New Revision: 277704 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277704&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-11-01 Kewen Lin PR testsuite/92127 * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/co