[Bug fortran/92113] [8/9/10 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760=gcc=rev should have been for this PR.

[Bug ipa/92133] Support multi versioning on self recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/92113] [8/9/10 regression] r276673 causes segfault in gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Nov 4 07:39:21 2019 New Revision: 277766 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277766=gcc=rev Log: 2019-11-04 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/92113 * ChangeLog: Fix PR number

[Bug c/92346] gcc mis-compute the side effect of inline assembly and produce code with unexpected output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92301] [10 Regression] Wrong vectorizer code since r277566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92301 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Richard

[Bug c/92346] New: gcc mis-compute the side effect of inline assembly and produce code with unexpected output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92346 Bug ID: 92346 Summary: gcc mis-compute the side effect of inline assembly and produce code with unexpected output Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/92344] New: Missing considering fre optimization of vector load in auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92344 Bug ID: 92344 Summary: Missing considering fre optimization of vector load in auto-vectorization Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/92345] New: [10 Regression] ICE in vec<_stmt_vec_info*, va_heap, vl_embed>::space (vect_get_and_check_slp_defs)

ass: vect b422bdcb.c: In function 'us': b422bdcb.c:5:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 5 | us (int sk, int jx) | ^~ 0xc78c56 crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191103/work/gcc-10-20191103/gcc/toplev.c:326 0xea2eef vec<_stmt_vec_info*, va_he

[Bug rtl-optimization/92342] [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2) > Oops I was modifying wrong branch :-/ > I can confirm reverting the commit fixes this issue. > Sorry for the noise. Funny, I had did the same :).

[Bug rtl-optimization/92342] [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #1) > Hi, > I reverted Segher's commit in my local tree, but am still seeing the same > code-gen for g(). Oops I was modifying wrong branch :-/ I

[Bug rtl-optimization/92342] [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug c++/92343] [[likely]]/[[unlikely]] prevent method from being a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92343 --- Comment #1 from Darrell Wright --- On compiler explorer this affects 9.1/9.2/trunk

[Bug c++/92343] New: [[likely]]/[[unlikely]] prevent method from being a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92343 Bug ID: 92343 Summary: [[likely]]/[[unlikely]] prevent method from being a constant expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/92133] Support multi versioning on self recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133 --- Comment #5 from Feng Xue --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > Author: tkoenig > Date: Sun Nov 3 22:33:53 2019 > New Revision: 277760 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760=gcc=rev > Log: > 2019-11-03 Thomas Koenig

[Bug rtl-optimization/92342] [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/92342] New: [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 Bug ID: 92342 Summary: [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/92341] missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92341 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92341] New: missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92341 Bug ID: 92341 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a compound literal Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/82612] missing -Warray-bounds on a non-zero offset from the address of a non-array object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82612 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92133] Support multi versioning on self recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Nov 3 22:33:53 2019 New Revision: 277760 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760=gcc=rev Log: 2019-11-03 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/92133 * trans-decl.c

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 87192, which changed state. Bug 87192 Summary: -Warray-bounds (even =2) does not work on struct members https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87192 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/87192] -Warray-bounds (even =2) does not work on struct members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87192 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/88565] enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sun Nov 3 22:11:37 2019 New Revision: 277758 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277758=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/88565 - enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 88565, which changed state. Bug 88565 Summary: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/88565] enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88565] enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 88565, which changed state. Bug 88565 Summary: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/77622] __builtin_object_size incorrect for an out-of-bounds pointer prior to destination object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92338] double/float thought (ambiguous) candidate for C-array index. (Non numeric types aren't.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92338 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I believe GCC is right, as unhelpful as that might seem.

[Bug c++/92340] Qualifiers check fails when inside template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340 --- Comment #2 from ercli at ucdavis dot edu --- Created attachment 47163 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47163=edit Compiler generated file using -save-temps

[Bug c++/92340] Qualifiers check fails when inside template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340 --- Comment #1 from ercli at ucdavis dot edu --- Created attachment 47162 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47162=edit Compiler generated file using -save-temps

[Bug c++/92340] New: Qualifiers check fails when inside template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340 Bug ID: 92340 Summary: Qualifiers check fails when inside template Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/92334] incorrect __builtin_object_size result for negative offsets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92334 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77622] __builtin_object_size incorrect for an out-of-bounds pointer prior to destination object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 92334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/92334] incorrect __builtin_object_size result for negative offsets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92334 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92339] ice at cp/typeck.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92339 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92339] New: ice at cp/typeck.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92339 Bug ID: 92339 Summary: ice at cp/typeck.c:1510 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/92338] New: double/float thought (ambiguous) candidate for C-array index. (Non numeric types aren't.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92338 Bug ID: 92338 Summary: double/float thought (ambiguous) candidate for C-array index. (Non numeric types aren't.) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/92039] [10 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds warnings building 32-bit glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039 --- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer --- *** Bug 92337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 92337, which changed state. Bug 92337 Summary: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/92337] Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92337] Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- Note: 31-bit s390 and 32-bit powerpc also match the triggering conditions, and glibc fails to build there, too.

[Bug lto/91288] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:153 since r249224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288 JD changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t at sharklasers dot com --- Comment #3 from JD

[Bug tree-optimization/92337] New: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337 Bug ID: 92337 Summary: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/78804] [RX] -m64bit-doubles does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804 --- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Nov 3 12:09:26 2019 New Revision: 277752 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277752=gcc=rev Log: libgcc/ PR libgcc/78804 * fp-bit.h: Remove

[Bug target/81426] [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #7) > Not sure if it's the same bug or not, but I get the same error building GHC "unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS'" ... kind of errors

[Bug target/81426] [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426 --- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 47159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47159=edit bug.c

[Bug target/81426] [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk

XFLAGS=-O0 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.0 20191103 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug modula2/92336] New: cross compiling gcc fails in gm2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92336 Bug ID: 92336 Summary: cross compiling gcc fails in gm2 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2

[Bug tree-optimization/92335] New: missed transformation to branchless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92335 Bug ID: 92335 Summary: missed transformation to branchless Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/92123] [F2018/array-descriptor] Scalar allocatable/pointer with array descriptor (via bind(C)): ICE with select rank or error scalar variable with POINTER or ALLOCATABLE in procedure wit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79274] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/pr77285-2.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler _ZTH4var1B3tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Nov 3 08:23:33 2019 New Revision: 277751 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277751=gcc=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR 79274 The solution for initialising global TLS variables

[Bug c++/79274] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/pr77285-2.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler _ZTH4var1B3tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Nov 3 07:59:32 2019 New Revision: 277750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277750=gcc=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR 79274 The solution for initialising global TLS variables