https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |testsuite
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Couldn't e.g. address space randomization of the instrumented binaries
> (compiler itself) matter?
I bet some hash-tables could end up with different access pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93124
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccb68179642cf7ba5ee05a0d8571a95d0145e3a2
commit r10-6166-gccb68179642cf7ba5ee05a0d8571a95d0145e3a2
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Couldn't e.g. address space randomization of the instrumented binaries
> (compiler itself) matter?
I must confirm that the machine where I run it has ASLR enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
And there's also a difference in TOPN counters:
diff -u a b
--- a 2020-01-23 10:30:56.527098370 +0100
+++ b 2020-01-23 10:30:42.035189528 +0100
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
-== Stats for after ==
+== Stats for befor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's done the same way as we've always created the ${host_builddir}/c++config.h
target, so I'm not sure why one is racy and the other isn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Even before IVOPTs we have an access to in[] "after" the clobber. I think the
fact that there are multiple instances of in is not well represented and
for the testcase at hand jump-threading essentially ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Concerning:
> > Honza, the type_has_compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93124
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47697
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47697&action=edit
GCOV dump diff
There's still some difference, but rather small.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a990ffafaaa18981c6e91d4ed88f05ed74c5f3f
commit r10-6170-g8a990ffafaaa18981c6e91d4ed88f05ed74c5f3f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93346
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9592f639ff4655203f1cffb7c6752696e2721fb0
commit r10-6171-g9592f639ff4655203f1cffb7c6752696e2721fb0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It's done the same way as we've always created the
> ${host_builddir}/c++config.h target, so I'm not sure why one is racy and the
> other isn't.
I didn't mean that the first one was not racy though ;-) B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93381
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5ee5d05f367d6221b76f7a3ef7dad96605dbf04
commit r10-6172-gf5ee5d05f367d6221b76f7a3ef7dad96605dbf04
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
Bug ID: 93399
Summary: Annotate assembler option failure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91123
Bug 91123 depends on bug 93354, which changed state.
Bug 93354 Summary: [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93346
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is a backend issue that we cannot solve properly without solving much bigger
generic problems first. See the BoF at last year’s cauldron. Without fixing
that first, doing signaling floats regresses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2020
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14e5e74698b98f4cbe398cb989dfa27765cbca6e
commit r10-6173-g14e5e74698b98f4cbe398cb989dfa27765cbca6e
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93387
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93384
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The error I see is:
/tmp/ccmVatwF.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccmVatwF.s:90: Error: invalid character (0xa) in mnemonic
/tmp/ccmVatwF.s:92: Error: unassigned file number 2
/tmp/ccmVatwF.s:92: Error: junk at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93324
--- Comment #5 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
Thank you! I can confirm it being fixed <3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91138
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
I also see this error when compiling Fedora package csdiff.
Reduced test case available on request.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91139
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
efault-pie
--enable-default-ssp --enable-cet=auto --disable-boostrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200123 (experimental) (GCC)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91120
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91810
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91916
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> You can also shorten the sha, say, g:28307164dfed here.
Yes, but I was asked by Jakub to always use:
git gcc-descr --full $hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #116 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-22 10:30 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #115 from Peter Bisroev ---
> Hi Dave,
>
> (In reply t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91882
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91873
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91824
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92463
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
dwarf2out.c:27492 or so
in dwarf2out_var_location.
I think ...
Here is a reduced testcase without any headers:
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) __attribute__
((__gnu_inline__)) char *
strs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93178
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The code at
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c;h=fc36bb6714b2a4c922e903e2ebe333c6bdaeefcd;hb=HEAD#l9229
does not treat this case specially, but it should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2214053f9d9cdf66a4f3a657dbae43d293fd0387
commit r10-6176-g2214053f9d9cdf66a4f3a657dbae43d293fd0387
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92453
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is simpler and less likely to cause problems:
# This header is not installed, it's only used to build libstdc++ itself.
${host_builddir}/largefile-config.h: ${CONFIG_HEADER}
@rm -f $@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92444
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Matt Emmerton from comment #9)
> > > __sync()
> > > __isync()
> > > __lwsync()
> >
> > The sync intrinsics need to be tied to some other code. A volatile asm with
> > a "memory" clobber i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Bug ID: 93401
Summary: [9/10 regression] It is no longer possible to use
-fprofile-generate= on setups with different
instrumentation and feedback directories
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
The divergence for non-randomization seems under control. But it also
seems that the divergence for randomized build is way too common to be
explained by differences in number of conflicts for hashtables hasing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
When you want the bits from bit MB to ME (inclusive) set, you can just do
li t,-1
rldic d,T,MB,63-ME
(bit # 0 is the high bit; can also do wrap-around masks this way).
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93398
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Also forgot to mention, it is also quite possible that some of the small
divergences propagate themselves into differences in the histogram and
thus differences in hot/cold decisions in completely unrelated cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Someone who can test this should send a patch, and Cc: the Musl OS port
maintainer
(is there one? There should be!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402
Bug ID: 93402
Summary: Wrong code when returning padded struct
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403
Bug ID: 93403
Summary: __gcov_indirect_call_profiler_v4 needs atomic version.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91824
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92778
Hannes Hauswedell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04681fca936b5bca1dd374dfb0fbca7ccb028994
commit r10-6177-g04681fca936b5bca1dd374dfb0fbca7ccb028994
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91947
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk, backport to the branch needed too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93376
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c124b345e460780e3c3d4a6e58d0e6e03da982a1
commit r10-6178-gc124b345e460780e3c3d4a6e58d0e6e03da982a1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
Another option, which does not create an inter-pass dependency and
does not clutter tree-inline any more, but which pessimizes IPA-SRA
(put perhaps just alittle bit?), is making sure that the statements
whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-(insn 14 13 23 2 (parallel [
-(set (reg:DI 1 dx [94])
-(plus:DI (reg:DI 1 dx [95])
-(reg:DI 5 di [92])))
-(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
-]) "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404
Bug ID: 93404
Summary: [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017
code size regression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why? Is there any advantage to that? The probability of having a collision
anywhere in the repo is nihil with ten digits already, and anywhere in the
world ever with twelve. Why do we want thirty-two?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
Good point. Since gnu::vector_size(N) types are defined by you, you might be
able to say that for char and short this is also UB. After all the left operand
isn't actually promoted to int. Consequently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405
Bug ID: 93405
Summary: Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran
... and the analyzer.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
