https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
Thanks a lot for Martin's help on reproduction. I can reproduce this ICE and
confirmed that if commenting out my patch r272731 in loop-iv.c, it can pass. I
can also reproduce it on powerpc64
(__builtin_inf ());
|^~
0x684722 real_maxval(real_value*, int, machine_mode)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.1_alpha20200202/work/gcc-10-20200202/gcc/real.c:2593
0x12d9cf5 generic_simplify_336
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc
== 0)
| ^
0xd8817f crash_signal
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.1_alpha20200202/work/gcc-10-20200202/gcc/toplev.c:328
0x1103308 ana::region_model::add_region_for_type(ana::region_id, tree_node*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.1_alpha20200202/work/gcc-10-20200202/gcc/anal
expected identifier or '(' before numeric constant
1 | __has_include
| ^
qmyoraks.c:1:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xd8817f crash_signal
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.1_alpha20200202/work/gcc-10-20200202/gcc/toplev.c:328
0x1824f32 _cpp_lex_direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93511
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
-model.cc:4613
13 | __builtin_free (dx);
| ^~~
0x71dc18 ana::region_model::get_lvalue_1(ana::path_var,
ana::region_model_context*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.1_alpha20200202/work/gcc-10-20200202/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc:4613
0x1104933 ana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #133 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #132)
> This has been reported before on net. Maybe you should try using flex
> library.
> It provides the above symbols in its library..
Building binutils with flex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #11 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> Created attachment 47762 [details]
> A patch to handle targetm.asm_out.post_cfi_startproc
I don't work on GCC, so I am hoping other x86 maintainers can review. (I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #132 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-02 6:01 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> h
> Yes, I always use --with-as and --with-gnu-as on this platform. However after
> putting binutils as the first entry in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #131 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #130)
> > In the meantime, I wanted to ask you. Is it OK for me to add to the PATH
> > directory containing binutils-2.32 compiled with aCC prior to bootstrapping
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
Bug ID: 93543
Summary: [10 regression] bootstrap with clang 9.0.1 fails in
analyzer: reinterpret_cast from 'nullptr_t' to
'function *' is not allowed
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b817be038d94c987e02c26ed2d81b6f2ebb5f97a
commit r10-6397-gb817be038d94c987e02c26ed2d81b6f2ebb5f97a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91989
--- Comment #2 from Christian Franke ---
If the builtin is also noreturn on the other (non-x86) platforms, a cosmetic
issue remains only:
libssp/ssp.c contains dead code with a misleading comment which suggests that
__builtin_trap() may return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
Bug ID: 93542
Summary: std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486
Mike Crowe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mac at mcrowe dot com
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #9)
> > Fixed by Vlad's patch on the trunk.
>
> This patch causes regressions:
> aarch64:
>
I've committed one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:897a73086b2d63a5a6ae79f4276422272eca534d
commit r10-6395-g897a73086b2d63a5a6ae79f4276422272eca534d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90377
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91707
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92893
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92879
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93358
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93519
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93535
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(testing clang++ -O2 -ffast-math is useful as well)
It would be more helpful if you could isolate some specific transformations
that gcc is missing, instead of one big benchmark.
For instance:
double f(int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93541
Bug ID: 93541
Summary: OpenMP module description incomplete in
gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi – missing PARAMETER
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
36 matches
Mail list logo
