https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Hemminger ---
X86
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, 5:38 PM pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86715
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71d69548a1b2c85220ac6354564fd272beb9263f
commit r10-7408-g71d69548a1b2c85220ac6354564fd272beb9263f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Also, which version of the compiler? I've fixed a few similar-looking problems
to this recently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also which target is this on? x86_64 or aarch64?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the preprocessed source?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
--- Comment #8 from Alexey Neyman ---
Created attachment 48129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48129=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
--- Comment #24 from Jim Wilson ---
Joel Sherrill offered to create a binutils bug report for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
--- Comment #23 from Václav Haisman ---
I am not sure what to report. I do not understand the background of linker and
relocations enough. Also, I don't have access to Windows and Cygwin any more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94057
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94057
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:517f5356bb0ca717f51e937be880e38a828edbf7
commit r10-7403-g517f5356bb0ca717f51e937be880e38a828edbf7
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350
Bug ID: 94350
Summary: internal compiler error: in
make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at
analyzer/region-model.cc:4874
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94348
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks for the quick reply, Steve. My apologies for not providing any text. I
dashed this off during a call with the person who reported the problem to me.
I think the code is legal, but I'm very open to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||overseers at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94348
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Bug ID: 94349
Summary: Bugzilla user preferences are blank
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94348
Bug ID: 94348
Summary: gfortran 8/9 reject module procedure definition in
same module as function interface
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The COMPOUND_EXPRs should be handled like their second operand by
handle_copy_attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr94343.c.jj 2020-03-26
17:47:40.008654504 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr94343.c 2020-03-26
17:48:37.169811375 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Few middle-end warnings consider control flow -- most simply look at a single
statement at a time and consider ranges of argument values (if any). Those
that do consider control flow (e.g.,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347
Bug ID: 94347
Summary: Assignment pointer at declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 48128 [details]
> gcc10-pr94343.patch
The avx512vl-pr94343.c test should ideally fail because `_mm_andnot_si128
((__m128i) (~v ^ a),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Bug ID: 94346
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute
since r9-3982
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
--- Comment #7 from Alexey Neyman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Alexey Neyman from comment #4)
> > Or add a similar "return if debug level is terse" at the beginning of
> > `gen_type_die` - I didn't notice that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48127|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> > The symbol __gxx_personality_v0 is part of libsupc++ – which I believe is
> > not build to to lacking/restricted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> The symbol __gxx_personality_v0 is part of libsupc++ – which I believe is
> not build to to lacking/restricted C++ support.
It is also exception handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, there are other issues. There is only vpternlog{d,q}, so for
V*[QH]Imode we shouldn't pretend we have masking support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It's a mistake to be referring to the C standard for the interpretation of
alignment attributes. The C standard way of specifying alignment is
_Alignas, not __attribute__, and if you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
--- Comment #6 from Anton ---
I also don't understand why all the parts of a template instantiation need to
be kept in the same COMDAT group. Neither clang nor gcc does it:
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
--- Comment #5 from Anton ---
Looking at the COMDAT groups for the example with 2 instantiations (Index
and Index), I think this is what is actually expected: section for
Index must not be grouped with section for Index. In general,
different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 48127 [details]
> gcc10-pr94343.patch
>
> That of course doesn't work if the input operand is memory. This should.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48127=edit
gcc10-pr94343.patch
That of course doesn't work if the input operand is memory. This should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345
Bug ID: 94345
Summary: std::chrono overflows due to c++14 non-compliance
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I was thinking about
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2020-03-06 11:35:46.284074858 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2020-03-26 17:35:23.690515228 +0100
@@ -12800,10 +12800,18 @@
(xor:VI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 48126
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48126=edit
A patch
Jakub, this is what I have. Feel free to ignore it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rotate pattern not |[9/10 Regression] Rotate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
g:c4c5ad1d6d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344
Bug ID: 94344
Summary: Rotate pattern not recognized anymore
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|9.2.0 |9.3.0
Known to fail|9.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343
Bug ID: 94343
Summary: [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd
instruction emitted for -march=knl
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > I've just run the test-case on aarch64 and it works fine (-O2, -O2 -flto,
> > -O3 -flto -fno-early-inlining). And lto.exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: |[8/9/10 Regression] error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/cp/call.c.jj2020-03-25 08:05:07.153731580 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/call.c 2020-03-26 15:03:42.432909693 +0100
@@ -333,11 +333,14 @@ set_flags_from_callee (tree call)
&& internal_fn_flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #16)
> Created attachment 48125 [details]
> untested patch
LGTM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the section attribute then only provides naming of the comdat section used
and cannot be used to group things. Not sure that is what you are looking
after.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, I see clang produces
COMDAT group section [3] `.group' [_Z5IndexIiEvi] contains 2 sections:
[Index]Name
[4] .text._Z5IndexIiEvi
[5] .rela.text._Z5IndexIiEvi
COMDAT group
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I think it should belong to the same .comdat group as other parts of the
template instantiation (there's one static var per instantiation) so I don't
see how the section specification can be easily honored.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48122|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
$ rm -f pr94326.C.*; ./cc1plus -quiet -std=c++11 pr94326.C -Wreturn-local-addr
-da; grep REG_EH_REGION pr94326.C.*
pr94326.C: In instantiation of ‘const int& A<
>::m_fn1() [with = int]’:
pr94326.C:5:45:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |c++
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342
Bug ID: 94342
Summary: GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static
variables inside templates
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94341
Matthew Malcomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94341
Bug ID: 94341
Summary: mve_mov can produce ICE on latest trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e519d644999d04e0a341cb034f4d954963b1d2d2
commit r10-7399-ge519d644999d04e0a341cb034f4d954963b1d2d2
Author: Richard Earnshaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |8.5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340
Bug ID: 94340
Summary: [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O failure on
cpp1z/nodiscard3.C
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 48123
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48123=edit
ada-lang.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94320
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> tried
> + && !lto_stream_offload_p
With that patch, I get 6 times "has been referenced in offloaded code but
hasn't been marked to be included in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339
Bug ID: 94339
Summary: [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da920d0c46c38fe25ee0b597a8698d3a4d098f3c
commit r10-7397-gda920d0c46c38fe25ee0b597a8698d3a4d098f3c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo