https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #8)
> Cross:
> ;;
> ;; Full RTL generated for this function:
> ;;
> (note 1 0 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
> (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> (insn 2 4 3 2 (set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94385
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, no. The problem is that the scheduler is moving
ldw r2, 0(r4)
ahead of
stw zero, 0(r5)
which is incorrect because the pointers in r4 and r5 are aliases.
So at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> So what causes this TF vs. IF? Cross and native should be exactly the same,
> but perhaps there is a difference in the configurations you have for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94379
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-28
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377
--- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh ---
I'm sorry, I made an error when making up this code from a much bigger one.
There was a missing ')' at line 8. I've corrected this in the code below.
Same kind of error here, but that code compiles on both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94385
Bug ID: 94385
Summary: Internal compiler error for __builtin_convertvector +
statement expr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94384
Bug ID: 94384
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94381
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #6)
> I can confirm about building trunk from yesterday that this code no longer
> ICEs on 03. Can someone please close this bug as it no longer blocks C++ VLA
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So what causes this TF vs. IF? Cross and native should be exactly the same,
but perhaps there is a difference in the configurations you have for the two?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014
Amir Shahmoradi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.shahmoradi at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That would be consistent with the new field being introduced in gcc-7 (by
r241187).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is the difference maybe related to the empty field that is added for c++17
mode, mentioned in Bug 89358 comment 12?
Is the aarch64 back end not ignoring that field?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84475
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
> So not sure how to proceed here at the moment (I wonder if this works for
> PPC on the clang impl).
It does work for X86 (and ironically, on PPC Darwin too - where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://godbolt.org/z/BnTEsn is an example with both functions in the same
translation unit, showing the generated code is different for both caller and
callee. If the caller and callee are not in the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
Bug ID: 94383
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed
incorrectly with -std=c++17
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94382
Bug ID: 94382
Summary: conflicting function types should show more context
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I created a pull request for the patch, it's linked to from that issue now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94381
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-28
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94381
Bug ID: 94381
Summary: -falign-function/-falign-labels/-falign-loops
documentation is inaccurate
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94348
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fb7f2fbd5f109786922deb5af8fd8dd594a7ba6
commit r10-7443-g3fb7f2fbd5f109786922deb5af8fd8dd594a7ba6
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94306
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94252
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94306
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7981c06ae92548bd66f07121db1802eb6aec73ed
commit r10-7442-g7981c06ae92548bd66f07121db1802eb6aec73ed
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94252
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe
commit r10-7441-ga7ea3d2ced786c4544fa625f34f515d89ed074fe
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
--- Comment #8 from Frédéric Buclin ---
Created attachment 48139
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48139=edit
Fix taint issue in Template/Provider.pm
I wrote a trivial patch to fix the taint issue reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94380
Bug ID: 94380
Summary: Nested associate+select type blocks cause compiler
segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
pskocik at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pskocik at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94379
Bug ID: 94379
Summary: Feature request: like clang, support
__attribute((__warn_unused_result__)) on structs,
unions, and enums
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90077
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed the error-recovery bug on the trunk, but the ice on the #c4 testcase is
still there (and the question is if it is valid or not). If it is valid,
probably the FE or gimplifier needs to turn that cast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6a562de88c44a555e1688c212869b20b02151bc
commit r10-7438-gc6a562de88c44a555e1688c212869b20b02151bc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] error: |[8/9 Regression] error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:679becf175c5d7f6b323cd3af0a09c6039b4123d
commit r10-7437-g679becf175c5d7f6b323cd3af0a09c6039b4123d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
so, it seems:
rs6000_function_ok_for_sibcall ()
calls rs6000_decl_ok_for_sibcall ()
which gets a NULL decl and thus this returns false
/* Under the AIX or ELFv2 ABIs we can't allow calls to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 27, 2020 9:19:33 PM GMT+01:00, "sandra at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
>
>--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>RTL before
43 matches
Mail list logo
