[Bug middle-end/94988] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/94993] New: aarch64 incompatible with -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94993 Bug ID: 94993 Summary: aarch64 incompatible with -mgeneral-regs-only Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #16 from Trupti Pardeshi --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15) > (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #14) > > Could you please help to know which version of gcc has this fix? > > GCC 9 Thank you Andrew for the repl

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #14) > Could you please help to know which version of gcc has this fix? GCC 9

[Bug middle-end/94992] gcc thinks a member variable is uninitialised

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/94992] gcc thinks a member variable is uninitialised

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 48477 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48477 testcase >my_future f2; >new (&f2) my_future(std::move(f2)); This is going to be problematic as f2 is being cre

[Bug middle-end/94992] New: gcc thinks a member variable is uninitialised

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94992 Bug ID: 94992 Summary: gcc thinks a member variable is uninitialised Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 Trupti Pardeshi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trupti_pardeshi@persistent.

[Bug c/94842] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_label_expr, at gimplify.c:2573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug target/94780] [8/9 Regression] ICE in walk_body at gcc/tree-nested.c:713 since r6-3632-gf6f69fb09c5f81df

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 f

[Bug target/94991] ICE: Segmentation fault with option -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94991 --- Comment #1 from Fei Yang --- For the given testcase, we are doing FAIL for scalar floating move expand pattern since TARGET_FLOAT is false with option -mgeneral-regs-only. But move expand pattern cannot fail. It would be better to to replace

[Bug target/94991] New: ICE: Segmentation fault with option -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94991 Bug ID: 94991 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault with option -mgeneral-regs-only Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/90915] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:4221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90915 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Pr

[Bug c++/92104] __builtin_has_attribute in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long double)==sizeof(double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94590 --- Comment #8 from Giuseppe D'Angelo --- Thank you!

[Bug target/91520] AVX512 target assembler fails for x86_64 Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > I plan on publishing an update to my alternate assembler/linker pair that > > incorporates the changes from LLVM-

[Bug c/94990] NFC / NFD in identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94990 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Note that ISO C references ISO 10646, not Unicode, so normalization forms are not part of the C notion of identifier characters and differently normalized forms are different identifiers as

[Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING CC|

[Bug bootstrap/84402] [meta] GCC build system: parallelism bottleneck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/94990] New: NFC / NFD in identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94990 Bug ID: 94990 Summary: NFC / NFD in identifiers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug target/91520] AVX512 target assembler fails for x86_64 Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/84257] Extremely slow compilation from gcc source code under macOS 10.13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/94143] [9/10/11 Regression] Asynchronous execute_command_line() breaks following synchronous calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94143 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 Vladimir Fuka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/94971] [10/11 Regression] Parallel Mode cannot be used in C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94971 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c24e97a97aaad4ad0500170cbae4f387d82ddd6 commit r11-180-g9c24e97a97aaad4ad0500170cbae4f387d82ddd6 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c/92472] enhancement: 5 * constify some parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92472 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cbc9d8b346b932f34828a51e8822881413951b7 commit r11-179-g4cbc9d8b346b932f34828a51e8822881413951b7 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug middle-end/94985] False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a non-zero offset in a referenced buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94985 --- Comment #2 from Joey Liu --- Just fyi, the patch attached in this ticket is slightly different than the patch in the mailing list (I limit it to flexible array only). It can handle the existing test cases (no regressions). However I do think

[Bug c++/94989] New: missing -Wclass-memaccess on calls to functions with attribute access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94989 Bug ID: 94989 Summary: missing -Wclass-memaccess on calls to functions with attribute access Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/94971] [10/11 Regression] Parallel Mode cannot be used in C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94971 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Parallel mode is basically broken for any new C++ standard. All the tests for C++20 constexpr algorithms fail, because the std::__parallel versions are not constexpr: FAIL: 25_algorithms/replace_if/conste

[Bug fortran/94943] [10 Regression] A module does not export allocatable attribute of herein arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug libstdc++/92894] "declared using local type 'test01()::X', is used but never defined" during concept satisfaction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92894, which changed state. Bug 92894 Summary: "declared using local type 'test01()::X', is used but never defined" during concept satisfaction https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92894 What|Remov

[Bug libstdc++/92894] "declared using local type 'test01()::X', is used but never defined" during concept satisfaction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92894 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fedf28c7921f125be75a9f688a7b845a1b5663b commit r10-8121-g6fedf28c7921f125be75a9f688a7b845a1b5663b Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/94829] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585 since r10-6063-g49789fd08378e3ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94829 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7100843831147a034fe37d231c54ac53ceace45 commit r11-178-gc7100843831147a034fe37d231c54ac53ceace45 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Thu M

[Bug c++/94817] ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:392 since r10-6063-g49789fd08378e3ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94817 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7100843831147a034fe37d231c54ac53ceace45 commit r11-178-gc7100843831147a034fe37d231c54ac53ceace45 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Thu M

[Bug libstdc++/94987] Missing vtable for std::__future_base::_State_base on libstdc++.a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94987 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94984] rejects requires clause in array declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94984 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug preprocessor/88937] valgrind error in parse_has_include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/94985] False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a non-zero offset in a referenced buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94985 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/94985] False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a non-zero offset in a referenced buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94985 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94765] Floating point type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/94857] Failure to optimize load+add+store into add on memory when getting carry flag afterwards on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94938] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:26522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94938] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:26522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5613c55c2900cd23c9e78592f10258e19c74ab3 commit r10-8120-ge5613c55c2900cd23c9e78592f10258e19c74ab3 Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug middle-end/94988] New: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 Bug ID: 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ] Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/94983] Empty list initialization of aggregate class with deleted default ctor rejected in C++14 and C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94983 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Vihrov --- Thanks for the helpful link. To clarify, list initialization in a new-expression context behaves differently from other cases such as "S{};" and "S s{};" (be their behavior correct or incorrect).

[Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long double)==sizeof(double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94590 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long double)==sizeof(double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94590 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d5dcc65aae1024da31e0e9cae6a8966461037e8 commit r11-176-g5d5dcc65aae1024da31e0e9cae6a8966461037e8 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Sun

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21968d4ae067e3fa1c1728c8db26478e8ac8ad0b commit r11-175-g21968d4ae067e3fa1c1728c8db26478e8ac8ad0b Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/91849] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Misleading diagnostic message when binding reference to unrelated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91849 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0 Su

[Bug ipa/94947] [8/9/10 Regression] -fipa-pta + pthread_once crash since r6-5684-g47e5754e17e9ac3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94947 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9250b3cb91b667cd67943e0fac94bf39ac089a8 commit r11-170-gb9250b3cb91b667cd67943e0fac94bf39ac089a8 Author: Richard Biener Date: T

[Bug target/94857] Failure to optimize load+add+store into add on memory when getting carry flag afterwards on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/94798] Failure to optimize subtraction and 0 literal properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- As for the subtraction followed by comparison, I think this is something normally optimized through peephole2, but that one doesn't trigger in this case due to RA decisions, where it sees different operands:

[Bug libstdc++/94987] Missing vtable for std::__future_base::_State_base on libstdc++.a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94987 --- Comment #1 from Karthik Nishanth --- gcc 5.5.0 Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.5.

[Bug libstdc++/94987] New: Missing vtable for std::__future_base::_State_base on libstdc++.a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94987 Bug ID: 94987 Summary: Missing vtable for std::__future_base::_State_base on libstdc++.a Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/94793] Failure to optimize clz idiom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94793 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/90928] [9/10/11 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-10-14 00:00:00 |2020-5-7 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sc

[Bug tree-optimization/94786] Missed min/max pattern using xor+and+less

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94786 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48475 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48475&action=edit gcc11-pr94786.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/94983] Empty list initialization of aggregate class with deleted default ctor rejected in C++14 and C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94983 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1008r1.pdf was the C++20 change, and the appendix shows the messy history.

[Bug tree-optimization/94786] Missed min/max pattern using xor+and+less

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94786 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug target/94780] [8/9 Regression] ICE in walk_body at gcc/tree-nested.c:713 since r6-3632-gf6f69fb09c5f81df

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780 Bug 94780 depends on bug 94950, which changed state. Bug 94950 Summary: [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/94950] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/94986] New: missing diagnostic on ARM thumb2 compilation with -pg when using r7 in inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986 Bug ID: 94986 Summary: missing diagnostic on ARM thumb2 compilation with -pg when using r7 in inline asm Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/93529] Implement P1009R2, Array size deduction in new-expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/94981] Wrong casts on Power machines dealing with fctiwuz instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981 --- Comment #7 from Tony Reix --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > Converting a negative float to an unsigned integer is undefined. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf says (page 43): If the value of the integ

[Bug other/94982] '-Wformat-diag' diagnostics building GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94982 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconf

[Bug c++/93431] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93431 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-01-27 00:00:00 |2020-5-7 Target|hppa2.0w-h

[Bug c++/94946] [9/10/11 Regression] error: ‘template JSC::FunctionPtr::FunctionPtr(returnType (*)())’ cannot be overloaded since r10-7998-g5f1cd1da1a805c3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94946 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fadd59262921825b135b8e018ac8510e97dee92a commit r9-8577-gfadd59262921825b135b8e018ac8510e97dee92a Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug c++/94957] Compilation slowww for simple code with -O1/2/3 and -g in GCC 8 and 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94957 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/94703] Small-sized memcpy leading to unnecessary register spillage unless done through a dummy union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/94703] Small-sized memcpy leading to unnecessary register spillage unless done through a dummy union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94703 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb72dc663e9070b281be83a80f6f838a3a878822 commit r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b281be83a80f6f838a3a878822 Author: Richard Biener Date: W

[Bug gcov-profile/94928] Doc comments in gcov-io.h do not show cwd and unexec blocks in the Notes file format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928 --- Comment #16 from Myron Walker --- Just seems easier if the tool offers a choice.

[Bug c++/94951] [8/9 Regression] dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules when using super class for a template type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] |dere

[Bug c/94968] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/94950] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 regression] ICE in |[8/9 regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/94907] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_return_expr) since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/94942] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2195 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -O -flive-range-shrinkage -ftree-vrp -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94942 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/94873] [8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-merge-constants -fno-split-wide-types -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[8/9/10 Regr

[Bug c/94842] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_label_expr, at gimplify.c:2573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] internal

[Bug c++/94985] New: False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a non-zero offset in a referenced buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94985 Bug ID: 94985 Summary: False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a non-zero offset in a referenced buffer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug fortran/94943] [10 Regression] A module does not export allocatable attribute of herein arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Mastellone --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > GCC 10.1 has been released. When it will be available on Fedora 32 I will test it.

[Bug c++/94946] [9/10/11 Regression] error: ‘template JSC::FunctionPtr::FunctionPtr(returnType (*)())’ cannot be overloaded since r10-7998-g5f1cd1da1a805c3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94946 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd38686d9c810cecbaa80bb82ed91caaa58ad635 commit r10-8117-gdd38686d9c810cecbaa80bb82ed91caaa58ad635 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug c++/94951] [8/9/10/11 Regression] dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules when using super class for a template type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d82414ebcf7716ea24688510594a2c464a105908 commit r10-8115-gd82414ebcf7716ea24688510594a2c464a105908 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug c++/94907] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_return_expr) since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982 commit r10-8114-g3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug c/94968] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da91f9d2b6edea15eee052f93976b15e786da536 commit r10-8116-gda91f9d2b6edea15eee052f93976b15e786da536 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug target/94950] [8/9/10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5454a13add37fa6a8eedbf9d2f6bdc63a7825e2c commit r10-8113-g5454a13add37fa6a8eedbf9d2f6bdc63a7825e2c Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug rtl-optimization/94873] [8/9/10 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-merge-constants -fno-split-wide-types -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8982e39b46b1e4a4b09022ddebd758b77ab73bac commit r10-8112-g8982e39b46b1e4a4b09022ddebd758b77ab73bac Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/94842] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_label_expr, at gimplify.c:2573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61fb8963c22d91152a9c46a3512307bef3b3d7f7 commit r10-8109-g61fb8963c22d91152a9c46a3512307bef3b3d7f7 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug target/94942] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2195 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -O -flive-range-shrinkage -ftree-vrp -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94942 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b53c1169a6d0b10d43de0a56aabf7386b67496b commit r10-8111-g1b53c1169a6d0b10d43de0a56aabf7386b67496b Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug target/94977] Some X86 inline assembly modifiers are not documented in the web documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94977 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94118] Undocumented inline assembly [target] operand modifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||craig.topper at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug target/94118] Undocumented inline assembly [target] operand modifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/94981] Wrong casts on Power machines dealing with fctiwuz instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Report the bug to boost then. BOOST is broken and should not depend on undefined behavior for out of range conversions.

[Bug c++/94946] [9/10/11 Regression] error: ‘template JSC::FunctionPtr::FunctionPtr(returnType (*)())’ cannot be overloaded since r10-7998-g5f1cd1da1a805c3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94946 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d865b29abc99122e9faf109fe8faf2d6616a073 commit r11-164-g1d865b29abc99122e9faf109fe8faf2d6616a073 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu

[Bug c/94968] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b95bb52b40c05e630278fe5cd61a79a3c4f620a commit r11-163-g9b95bb52b40c05e630278fe5cd61a79a3c4f620a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|11.0

[Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629 --- Comment #8 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #7) > commit ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f > Author: GDB Administrator > Date: Wed Dec 19 00:00:21 2018 + > > Automatic date update in version.in

[Bug c++/94984] rejects requires clause in array declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94984 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/94984] New: rejects requires clause in array declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94984 Bug ID: 94984 Summary: rejects requires clause in array declaration Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

  1   2   3   >