[Bug tree-optimization/95662] New: [11 regression] ICE at gimple-expr.c:87 since r11-1146

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662 Bug ID: 95662 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at gimple-expr.c:87 since r11-1146 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/95661] New: Code built with -m32 uses SSE2 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95661 Bug ID: 95661 Summary: Code built with -m32 uses SSE2 instructions Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/95660] get_intel_cpu in cpuinfo.c contains unnecessary check for brand_id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/95660] get_intel_cpu in cpuinfo.c contains unnecessary check for brand_id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:40:29PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 04:16:53AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 > > > > --- Comm

[Bug target/95660] get_intel_cpu in cpuinfo.c contains unnecessary check for brand_id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-12 Version|unknown

[Bug target/95660] New: get_intel_cpu in cpuinfo.c contains unnecessary check for brand_id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660 Bug ID: 95660 Summary: get_intel_cpu in cpuinfo.c contains unnecessary check for brand_id Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/95637] Read-only data assigned to `.sdata' rather than `.rodata'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95637 --- Comment #2 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- I think perhaps using constant pools would be the best of both worlds?

[Bug rtl-optimization/94740] ICE on testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/t5.c with -mcpu=future -mpcrel -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94740 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Teo Samarzija from comment #5) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > > (In reply to Teo Samarzija from comment #3) > > > Besides, how does CLANG compile that same code fine, also under Linu

[Bug target/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 --- Comment #5 from Teo Samarzija --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > (In reply to Teo Samarzija from comment #3) > > Besides, how does CLANG compile that same code fine, also under Linux and > > with "-masm=intel"? Maybe you can copy

[Bug target/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Teo Samarzija from comment #3) > Besides, how does CLANG compile that same code fine, also under Linux and > with "-masm=intel"? Maybe you can copy the way CLANG does that. Clang outputs:

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 Rafael Avila de Espindola changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48579|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/95346] [coroutines] coroutine return-type should be initialised with rvalue if different from get_return_object() return-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95346 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95350] [coroutines] coroutines with move-only by-value parameters attempt to copy parameter instead of move it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95350 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95659] New: Inconsistent error message in "default argument missing for parameter"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95659 Bug ID: 95659 Summary: Inconsistent error message in "default argument missing for parameter" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95350] [coroutines] coroutines with move-only by-value parameters attempt to copy parameter instead of move it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95350 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:284f809ef7fe8fa6b518c103d31e514a98f0f36e commit r10-8285-g284f809ef7fe8fa6b518c103d31e514a98f0f36e Author: Iain Sandoe Dat

[Bug c++/95658] New: Bogus duplicate error message in "decltype(auto)" type specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95658 Bug ID: 95658 Summary: Bogus duplicate error message in "decltype(auto)" type specifier Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 --- Comment #3 from Teo Samarzija --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > This looks closer to a dup of bug 87986. > > Basically -masm=intel is not always working. When does it occur? Maybe we can determine when it can occur and warn

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:33:20PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Why don't we simply set IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE (1._10) to .false.? > > use, int

[Bug fortran/95654] nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr66199-5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1) > Have you verified that it's the same underlying issue It's not but would otherwise be a duplicate. > or do you just want to wait for PR95109 being resolved bef

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/95651] GCC compilation error on AArch64: error: expected expression: AARCH64_INIT_MEMTAG_BUILTINS_DECL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95651 noan at email dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95657] New: Bogus error message in "auto" with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95657 Bug ID: 95657 Summary: Bogus error message in "auto" with -std=c++11 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/95656] Inconsistent output in compiling an undefined function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95656 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/95654] nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr66199-5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Tobias, I see you've unassigned yourself here, and set Depends on: PR95109. Have you verified that it's the same underlying issue, or do you just want to wait for PR95109 being resolved before analyzing th

[Bug c++/95656] New: Inconsistent output in compiling an undefined function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95656 Bug ID: 95656 Summary: Inconsistent output in compiling an undefined function Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On June 12, 2020 3:28:16 PM GMT+02:00, "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 > >--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- >(In reply to Richard Biene

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'll ask the new LWG chair to bump the issue.

[Bug c++/68342] Unexpected expansion pattern contains no argument packs error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68342 Paul Keir changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I cannot reproduce the arm failure, neon-fp1 doesn't seem to exist and any > combo of -mcpu=cortex-a9 and -mfpu=... does not ICE for me. Sorry, that was a cut

[Bug middle-end/95622] [11 Regression] force_output flag on a variable prevents optimization / regresses c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta{-2,-4,}.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95622 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- I think there are three related issues here: (a) force_output = 1 prevents at least one optimization (b) If not using force_output = 1, we need to find another way to tell the compiler that the variable is

[Bug target/95655] -mfentry -pg generates extra push/pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95655 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #19 from Maxim Egorushkin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > At this time LWG 2381 is still open. Until the proposed fix (or some other > fix) is resolved by making a change to the draft standard, I do not want to >

[Bug target/95650] aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95650 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95655] -mfentry -pg generates extra push/pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95655 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- The differences starts at IRA: diff -upr good/y.i.286r.ira bad/y.i.286r.ira --- good/y.i.286r.ira 2020-06-12 05:15:19.975544607 -0700 +++ bad/y.i.286r.ira2020-06-12 05:12:35.275007543 -0700 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@

[Bug target/95650] aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95650 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- I think clang's optimisation is sound here. C says that we add two shorts as int and then truncate to short (i.e. reduce mod 16). The question is whether the top bits being set (which the ABI allows) can infl

[Bug target/95655] -mfentry -pg generates extra push/pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95655 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/95655] New: -mfentry -pg generates extra push/pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95655 Bug ID: 95655 Summary: -mfentry -pg generates extra push/pop Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confir

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC 8.3.1 generates |GCC 8.3.1 generates |s

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 Paul A. Bristow changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com --- Com

[Bug fortran/95654] New: nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr66199-5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654 Bug ID: 95654 Summary: nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr66199-5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

[Bug target/95650] aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95650 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ABI | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug c/95652] GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 --- Comment #1 from Teo Samarzija --- Possibly related, "as --version" prints: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.33.1 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GN

[Bug tree-optimization/95570] vect: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95570 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug middle-end/95622] [11 Regression] force_output flag on a variable prevents optimization / regresses c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta{-2,-4,}.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95622 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|force_output flag on a |[11 Regression] |var

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] New: [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

c-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-1248-20200612093253-g47fe96341d2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compressi

[Bug c/95652] New: GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95652 Bug ID: 95652 Summary: GCC 8.3.1 generates syntactically incorrect assembly code Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/95570] vect: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95570 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d30846a02eb9ea43b61311e74fbf05692ffefba2 commit r11-1283-gd30846a02eb9ea43b61311e74fbf05692ffefba2 Author: Fei Yang Date: Fri

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Here's what I get on qemu-m68k-system (instead of qemu-user): root@pacman:/srv/gcc-debug/build-jit/gcc# ./xgcc -B ./ -xc++ -nostdinc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null -fself-test=../../src/gcc/testsuite/

[Bug target/95650] aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95650 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think clang is wrong here. The abi says the non lower 16 bits is undefined. So they could be set and you could get a wrap around.

[Bug tree-optimization/92029] [10/11 Regression] 'libgomp.fortran/pr90779.f90' ICE for nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92029 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:135a8ad3a59972ea64b1244b0e221cdded9a6ec6 commit r11-1282-g135a8ad3a59972ea64b1244b0e221cdded9a6ec6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I cannot reproduce the arm failure, neon-fp1 doesn't seem to exist and any combo of -mcpu=cortex-a9 and -mfpu=... does not ICE for me.

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The first one is EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION where the ICE is fixed with the following which looks like a simple omission in the causing patch. diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c index cd

[Bug target/95651] GCC compilation error on AArch64: error: expected expression: AARCH64_INIT_MEMTAG_BUILTINS_DECL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95651 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/95651] New: GCC compilation error on AArch64: error: expected expression: AARCH64_INIT_MEMTAG_BUILTINS_DECL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95651 Bug ID: 95651 Summary: GCC compilation error on AArch64: error: expected expression: AARCH64_INIT_MEMTAG_BUILTINS_DECL Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95650] New: aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95650 Bug ID: 95650 Summary: aarch64: Missed optimization storing addition of two shorts Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95634 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5222017313f5abf39e2374dc11bcac9b444f1b4c commit r8-10308-g5222017313f5abf39e2374dc11bcac9b444f1b4c Author: Martin Liska Date

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d746191e271949e530d9e5f46cde7e7bf08272f commit r8-10307-g5d746191e271949e530d9e5f46cde7e7bf08272f Author: Martin Liska Dat

[Bug fortran/95109] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90 after r11-349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95109 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Any update on the failing target1.f90 test-case? Not yet. What needs to be done is to mark loop variables as "private" – and attach this to the proper OpenMP dire

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95634 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:187c96ea5310cef1977d8a44b0b9a6b561b6c8c7 commit r9-8672-g187c96ea5310cef1977d8a44b0b9a6b561b6c8c7 Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:877d8d63228579bd56f94e6c56fbfeb015da08e5 commit r9-8671-g877d8d63228579bd56f94e6c56fbfeb015da08e5 Author: Martin Liska Date

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:036b288ca4cf5d3b1d908ef97c25b7f92153ff8a commit r10-8283-g036b288ca4cf5d3b1d908ef97c25b7f92153ff8a Author: Martin Liska Da

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95634 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1d68582022cfa2b1dc76646724b397ba2739439 commit r10-8284-ge1d68582022cfa2b1dc76646724b397ba2739439 Author: Martin Liska Dat

[Bug tree-optimization/95643] Optimizer fails to realize that a variable tested twice in a row is the same both times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever con

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/95638] [10/11 Regression] Legit-looking code doesn't work with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Summary|Legit-looking

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org