https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833
Bug ID: 95833
Summary: Incorrect static_assert in std::reduce overload taking
a binary functor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
URL: https://stackoverflow.com/q/62499765
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
--- Comment #3 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
I did the former, you do the latter :P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95708
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56dfd92cc3b43a97b7e50f7de6f417a87e43aaa9
commit r10-8346-g56dfd92cc3b43a97b7e50f7de6f417a87e43aaa9
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90594
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Sorry, I get easily distracted. The while the "prerequesite" is ready the
actual fix is not. I'll see whether to at least get that prerequesite
pushed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95708
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb9a24a6b6b2a020824b835e3a6ac0e52a5bdbd2
commit r9-8690-geb9a24a6b6b2a020824b835e3a6ac0e52a5bdbd2
Author: Mark Eggleston
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95834
Bug ID: 95834
Summary: x86 immediates --- some redundant
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95824
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95835
Bug ID: 95835
Summary: Wrong line information at Og
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95823
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95822
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95813
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c98fc4eb3afeda6ad8220d0d79bc1247a92c7c65
commit r11-1598-gc98fc4eb3afeda6ad8220d0d79bc1247a92c7c65
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836
Bug ID: 95836
Summary: Failure to remove strchr converted to bool with string
literal when bit magic would be much more efficient
(and sometimes smaller)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
Bug ID: 95837
Summary: derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong
code with component access (kind=4 ignored)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95250
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Witold Baryluk from comment #0)
> https://godbolt.org/z/xWrXP5
>
> Minimized version
>
> ```
> module m;
>
> import std.traits : Unsigned;
>
> void* f(T)(T a, T b) {
> alias UnsignedVoi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95308
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e64ef0dfde9482d6004a406dd64bb7da109122f
commit r10-8352-g7e64ef0dfde9482d6004a406dd64bb7da109122f
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80416aac46779533476425424e06753bac67e148
commit r10-8348-g80416aac46779533476425424e06753bac67e148
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94964
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb2b8bf32b72a7976b2bdea1fa04c8af50786429
commit r10-8347-gfb2b8bf32b72a7976b2bdea1fa04c8af50786429
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95118
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe19d514ae915163b49fa344703ecfa1778a44d8
commit r10-8349-gfe19d514ae915163b49fa344703ecfa1778a44d8
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2eed94cbf2e8182d700aac3ac52b0967f00a2621
commit r10-8353-g2eed94cbf2e8182d700aac3ac52b0967f00a2621
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc08609b62ed37d279c986ebb9cb8294eb4e0e3b
commit r10-8351-gcc08609b62ed37d279c986ebb9cb8294eb4e0e3b
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d93c1bdbb1fb59e56f115601c792fa539e8deb5
commit r10-8350-g1d93c1bdbb1fb59e56f115601c792fa539e8deb5
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[8/9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23
Component|debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838
Bug ID: 95838
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in (Segmentation Fault)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #3)
> Iain,
>
> Do platforms that use dsymutil support -gsplit-dwarf?
None I am aware of - Darwin should reject -gsplit-dwarf with a diagnostic, so
that configuration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
also seen with 20200623:
../watchdog.ii: In member function ‘void g::e()’:
../watchdog.ii:20:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
20 | c()
| ^
0x12f56ac crash_signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Summary|[10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95838
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
Bug ID: 95839
Summary: Failure to optimize addition of vector elements to
vector addition
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840
Bug ID: 95840
Summary: Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95841
Bug ID: 95841
Summary: Bad location expression for TLS variable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
but is .dSYM ever generated when no -g is present?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e4d807085a1cfd68ae79cb1abbe15114964a921
commit r10-8354-g2e4d807085a1cfd68ae79cb1abbe15114964a921
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
commit r10-8355-g7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95690
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
commit r10-8355-g7d919c33fbd29a996326840dae3b5e093c3190f4
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #5)
> but is .dSYM ever generated when no -g is present?
If it was that would e an error, so correctly would cause the test to fail.
That's why I was doing:
if {[s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
Bug ID: 95842
Summary: arch_names_table and processor_alias_table should be
combined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think on trunk this has been fixed with
g:b19d8aac15649f31a7588b2634411a1922906ea8
2020-06-03 Romain Naour
* Makefile.in (SELFTEST_DEPS): Move before including language makefile
fragme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95646
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f426554fd804d65509875d706d8b8bc3a48393b
commit r11-1601-g5f426554fd804d65509875d706d8b8bc3a48393b
Author: Andre Simoes D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95676
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
--- Comment #7 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
> Not possible to backport to gcc-10, because the front end support
isn't there. That unfortunately means std::variant construction works
differently in each of gcc-9, gcc-10 and master.
Doesn't the n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95768
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
Bug ID: 95843
Summary: Duplicated ISA info in driver-i386.c and
i386-builtins.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95844
Bug ID: 95844
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
cp_warn_deprecated_use)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, that doesn't work for things convertible to pointers.
#include
struct P { operator void*() const; };
std::variant v{ P{} };
The argument type here is not a pointer, so your suggestion would construct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95629
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95845
Bug ID: 95845
Summary: Failure to optimize vector load made in separate
operations to single load
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Yeah I wasn't sure whether this was legitimate, I was just trying to give a
small example here, I dont think doesn't changes anything to how the
optimization is able to work unless GCC has targets where `a <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Proposed fix at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548730.html
Seems to work for me. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95836
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, it does, we can't keep it in the IL in that form because the compiler
itself might optimize it away on the assumption that UB doesn't happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846
Bug ID: 95846
Summary: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to
be resolved as NULL
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
The test case is invalid, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054579.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95477
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:788b962aa00959e861b45767c5c88ec41ca30c21
commit r11-1613-g788b962aa00959e861b45767c5c88ec41ca30c21
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > The problem seems more serious.
> >
> > type t
> > character(len=:, kind=4), pointer :: str2
> > end t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847
Bug ID: 95847
Summary: Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files
with --coverage
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95777
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95775
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Hey. My opinion is similar to Richi's. If you really want a highly optimized
library, you should rather use a dlopen mechanism with pre-built set of
options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
I see the test-cases fixed.
Can you still reproduce that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95828
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f609029c7078fbd29e2f842074e2b99ea099096
commit r11-1614-g6f609029c7078fbd29e2f842074e2b99ea099096
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date: Tue Jun 23 21:59:47 2020 +0200
Make forall stateme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:862ea30fcb50735344f853e330ea58025fbe82d3
commit r10-8357-g862ea30fcb50735344f853e330ea58025fbe82d3
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:449246af10befa7e973cd6f864138e6cdd5c24e5
commit r9-8692-g449246af10befa7e973cd6f864138e6cdd5c24e5
Author: Harald Anlauf
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8
commit r9-8693-g84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8
Author: Harald Anlauf
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cfdae8e4a96912871865d289a5a817cec68eaa0
commit r8-10325-g4cfdae8e4a96912871865d289a5a817cec68eaa0
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95687
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95688
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95707
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Bug ID: 95848
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 49754, which changed state.
Bug 49754 Summary: Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976
Bug 89976 depends on bug 49754, which changed state.
Bug 49754 Summary: Wuninitialized does not work with structs/unions/arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
