https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE |[9 Regression] ICE during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95717
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3a27a610b0eb9a7ea76f61b4fecf7e66e86a3e1
commit r10-8359-gf3a27a610b0eb9a7ea76f61b4fecf7e66e86a3e1
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
Bug ID: 95856
Summary: [11 Regression] error: definition in block 2 follows
the use since r11-1582-gcf07eea8429c923b
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593
Tobias Schlüter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
Bug ID: 95857
Summary: Silencing an unused label warning with (void)&&label;
can make gcc segfault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858
Bug ID: 95858
Summary: [11 Regression]
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_
5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
Bug ID: 95859
Summary: Statically true asserts not recognized as such with
-O2, but with -O1, -Og, -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95753
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
One more arc-linux case:
{ OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_mcase_vector_pcrel, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_msize_level_, NULL, 3 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_mmillicode, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_3_PLU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95860
Bug ID: 95860
Summary: Wrong "looser exception specification" when a class
has 2 prospective destructors.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #27 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #25)
> Yes, it's definitely related.
> Please attach -E file and a command line.
Problem stills exists in the g++ compiler dated 20200623, but anything
I do to redu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95810
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01e10b0ee77e82cb331414c569e02dc7a2c4999e
commit r11-1620-g01e10b0ee77e82cb331414c569e02dc7a2c4999e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
Bug ID: 95861
Summary: popcnt --- unnecessary leading xor instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
> Confirmation sought that the stack backtrace I provided shows
> that the problem is a bug in the pre-processor.
No, the problem is in C parser.
>
> If so, -E isn't going to help.
Please attach it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #29 from David Binderman ---
Maybe I've been slightly less than clear, but to quote myself:
>anything I do to reduce the problem makes it go away
So I can't provide a small test case, or output from -E, for this.
I suggest I wait un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #30 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #29)
> Maybe I've been slightly less than clear, but to quote myself:
> >anything I do to reduce the problem makes it go away
Ah, ok!
>
> So I can't provide a smal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
--- Comment #41 from Martin Liška ---
The patch survives PGO bootstrap of GCC and it shrinks size of gcda
file from 17MB to 12MB.
And compression can achieve the following:
zstd: 3.3 MB
$ time zstd *
real0m0.082s
user0m0.068s
sys0m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #31 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #30)
> What's the project where you see the issue?
Chatterino2, in fedora rawhide.
Be warned, you will need my environment for gcc to see the problem.
More thought
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #32 from Martin Liška ---
> I am busy with other stuff right now, but by the weekend, I should be
> able to enhance routine internal_error to produce a preprocessed source
> code file and so we can make progress.
Thank you very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95862
Bug ID: 95862
Summary: Failure to optimize usage of __builtin_mul_overflow to
small __int128-based check
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d32708e796504eaeaad7d19990909204d74f9ba3
commit r11-1621-gd32708e796504eaeaad7d19990909204d74f9ba3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 95856, which changed state.
Bug 95856 Summary: [11 Regression] error: definition in block 2 follows the use
since r11-1582-gcf07eea8429c923b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fb2c2f4d0a43b96e9e4907db952e57a5cbe61ef
commit r11-1623-g3fb2c2f4d0a43b96e9e4907db952e57a5cbe61ef
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jun 23 12:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95863
Bug ID: 95863
Summary: Failure to detect table-based ctz implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864
Bug ID: 95864
Summary: [11 Regression] GCN offloading execution regressions
after commit f062c3f11505b70c5275e5bc0e52f3e441f8afbc
"amdgcn: Switch to HSACO v3 binary format"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be50843754b4c4d47f0d628a84b3dbf2a4145a43
commit r11-1624-gbe50843754b4c4d47f0d628a84b3dbf2a4145a43
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95865
Bug ID: 95865
Summary: Wrong line information at Og
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117
fsmoke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fsmoke at mail dot ru
--- Comment #4 from fsmok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
Bug ID: 95866
Summary: vectorized shift with scalar argument not correctly
costed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Bug ID: 95867
Summary: Failure to optimize successive multiplications of
___uint128_t
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS : Of course this can be optimized in the general case, I was only giving an
example here, I wouldn't want only the pattern of 653 successive
multiplications to be optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95868
Bug ID: 95868
Summary: Derived-type deferred-length character component
handling broken
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1890f2f0e210ef515c39728c54151372d36dd187
commit r11-1627-g1890f2f0e210ef515c39728c54151372d36dd187
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon May 18 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I'm aware of these issues.
I fixed all the test failures that were definitely bugs in the HSACOv3
implementation, and the ones that remain appear to be either latent bugs
uncovered by the new driver configur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Corallo ---
"aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
> akrl, any clue as to where this .out is coming from in your runs? I get .exe
> in my arm test runs; I don't see anything th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's done through POWI internally, I guess we could open the internal function
to also operate on integers...
As for overflow for a multiplication chain of the same operand there shouldn't
be any issue, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Schlüter ---
Created attachment 48779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48779&action=edit
Preprocessed source x86 (32bit)
Here's preprocessed source for x86 (32 bit). This shows the same behavior as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c35d16a3925958b3a22426de0cb8e04f654b6dd
commit r11-1629-g6c35d16a3925958b3a22426de0cb8e04f654b6dd
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jun 24 04:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95774
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:403e166b974f53982d78efdd70938d05b6983b2a
commit r11-1630-g403e166b974f53982d78efdd70938d05b6983b2a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jun 19 21:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
What I find interesting is a similar case with the division instead of the
addition. Clang compiles it to:
divps %xmm1, %xmm0
retq
Considering that we have [a0, a1, 0, 0] / [b0, b1, 0, 0], t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff5c8fe44a98025c1e700cfc033247965e293869
commit r10-8360-gff5c8fe44a98025c1e700cfc033247965e293869
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter ---
ps here's the compiler explorer link for the preprocessed test.
https://godbolt.org/z/zDw5JQ
I tried manually reducing it, but couldn't easily get below the 1000kib limit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95774
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:134f7c941929b3d099322a89928c04e5ac69267e
commit r11-1631-g134f7c941929b3d099322a89928c04e5ac69267e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jun 12 16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95660
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95869
Bug ID: 95869
Summary: ICE when "target parallel" construct used with "if"
clause in Fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ocessed cource code)
I can reproduce this bug with the following gcc versions:
9.3.0
10.1.0
11.0.0 20200624 (experimental) [this was built with revision eb0ff770e29 from
git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git, which was the tip of the master branch on 24th
of June, 2020]
The bug does not happen with:
7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95871
Bug ID: 95871
Summary: Duplicated error message : "the value is not usable in
a constant expression"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95872
Bug ID: 95872
Summary: Duplicated warning message in "-Wlogical-op"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95873
Bug ID: 95873
Summary: Duplicated warning message "'class' tag used in naming
'union a'"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, with some pending patch applied and
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
index ca6bedc9cc8..3d5de39383c 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
@@ -3130,7 +3130,7 @
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95874
Bug ID: 95874
Summary: CLWB isn't supported on Icelake client
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95875
Bug ID: 95875
Summary: Misleading error message "invalid use of incomplete
type"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95876
Bug ID: 95876
Summary: Error in compiling gcc-11-20200621 with gcc-10 without
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88752
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95853
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Hit this when reducing something:
template class a b[]()->int
So it'd be nice to fix it to alleviate problems when reducing C++ code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like it started with r251433.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced, but invalid:
template class a {
public:
a();
int b = [] { enum E {}; };
};
class c : a {
c();
};
template a::a() = default;
c::c() {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
Bug ID: 95877
Summary: gfortran.dg/pr95689.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95866
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c78907d514d65483c7ddfb4cb1f5c57f23da73d9
commit r11-1633-gc78907d514d65483c7ddfb4cb1f5c57f23da73d9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67311
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch – without one recursively checks the same type.
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
@@ -330,6 +330,11 @@ gfc_has_alloc_comps (tree type, tree decl)
return false;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89310
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Maybe you can make a define_insn_and_split for the lshrdi3 plus this?
Which will split to an insn fewer immediately.
If you split after reload you need many extra patterns to get the most
basic optimisa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95878
Bug ID: 95878
Summary: ICE when compiling code that mixes an empty class,
[[no_unique_address]] and non-trivial default and copy
constructors
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #0)
> g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8, r9-8693
>
> This same error occurs on both gcc 8 and 9. Bad backport maybe?
I do not get this error on x8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boris.staletic at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Another test:
struct istream_iterator {
istream_iterator() {}
istream_iterator(const istream_iterator&) {}
};
istream_iterator next(istream_iterator&& bound) {
return static_cast(bou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95878
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
Bug ID: 95879
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2729
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
Bug ID: 95880
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at
fortran/symbol.c:2030
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95881
Bug ID: 95881
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at
fortran/resolve.c:15175
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
Bug ID: 95882
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2729
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
