[Bug middle-end/95886] suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/95189] [10/11 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/95993] the error of VLA multi-array init in gcc 10.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95993 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70075] incorrect initialization of multidimensional VLAs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengcongxiu at huawei dot com ---

[Bug testsuite/96014] [11 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C excess errors starting with r11-1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95993] the error of VLA multi-array init in gcc 10.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95993 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is using an GNU extension because VLAs are not part of C++ standard.

[Bug testsuite/96014] [11 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C excess errors starting with r11-1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- pthread_self seems to be defined in libc.a not libpthread.a so using --whole-archive around -lpthread doesn't help.

[Bug testsuite/96014] [11 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C excess errors starting with r11-1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014 --- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer --- Also these failures: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- This happens with std::thread too, not just std::jthread. #include int main() { std::thread t; if (t.get_id() == std::this_thread::get_id()) throw 1; t.join(); } It looks like the weak

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/95992] chrono adding duration to time_point reports signed integer overflow with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95992 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 --- Comment #6 from Antal Buss --- Unfortunately no, I'm compiling with (suggested in stackoverflow): g++-10 -Wall -Wextra -o test --static -std=c++20 test.cc -lrt -pthread -Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive but still

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Does -Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread make it work?

[Bug testsuite/96014] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C excess errors starting with r11-1697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014 Bug ID: 96014 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C excess errors starting with r11-1697 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- NULL pointer dereference fix, committed to master as obvious: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054665.html Backports pending.

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- With this patch the code compiles: Index: gcc/fortran/module.c === --- gcc/fortran/module.c(revision 280157) +++

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > > The code is invalid. Patch against svn revision 280156. > > > > Index: gcc/fortran/module.c > >

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:267f84c6035c9380c8d1e9cb83ffe299c23e3a85 commit r11-1742-g267f84c6035c9380c8d1e9cb83ffe299c23e3a85 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > The code is invalid. Patch against svn revision 280156. > > Index: gcc/fortran/module.c > ===

[Bug c++/95726] ICE with aarch64 __Float32x4_t as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux |aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ---

[Bug c++/92789] Non-obvious ?: behaviour with structurally equivalent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Keeping open since the problem also affects arm*-*-*. I don't think we should change GCC 10 and earlier though.

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/96011] ICE in check_function_name, at fortran/decl.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96011 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug c++/95726] ICE with aarch64 __Float32x4_t as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31427b974ed7b7dd54e28fec595e731bf6eea8ba commit r11-1741-g31427b974ed7b7dd54e28fec595e731bf6eea8ba Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c++/92789] Non-obvious ?: behaviour with structurally equivalent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92789 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31427b974ed7b7dd54e28fec595e731bf6eea8ba commit r11-1741-g31427b974ed7b7dd54e28fec595e731bf6eea8ba Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c++/95999] New: ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95999 Bug ID: 95999 Summary: ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5951 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95963] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963 W E Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/95993] New: the error of multi-array init in gcc 10.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95993 Bug ID: 95993 Summary: the error of multi-array init in gcc 10.1 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/95989] New: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 Bug ID: 95989 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/95992] New: chrono adding duration to time_point reports signed integer overflow with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95992 Bug ID: 95992 Summary: chrono adding duration to time_point reports signed integer overflow with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/27318] gfortran should warn if a interface does not match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.

[Bug fortran/96013] New: ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 Bug ID: 96013 Summary: ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/96012] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96012 Bug ID: 96012 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2558 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96011] New: ICE in check_function_name, at fortran/decl.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96011 Bug ID: 96011 Summary: ICE in check_function_name, at fortran/decl.c:2429 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/90409] std::move[_backward] could be more optimized for deque iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90409 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/71706] [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE on using sync images with integer(kind<>4), with -fcoarray=lib -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] [Coarray]

[Bug fortran/95978] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:731

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95978 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/95978] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:731

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95978 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa0868ffe0fd45891a9596bf4995f1b610243fa6 commit r10-8400-gaa0868ffe0fd45891a9596bf4995f1b610243fa6 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/71706] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [Coarray] ICE on using sync images with integer(kind<>4), with -fcoarray=lib -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d8ee8e91eb07cd529230321f458d424019c0f07 commit r10-8399-g5d8ee8e91eb07cd529230321f458d424019c0f07 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug tree-optimization/96009] missed optimization with floating point operations and integer literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Component|c

[Bug gcov-profile/96010] New: std::make_tuple called over multiple lines reports lines as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96010 Bug ID: 96010 Summary: std::make_tuple called over multiple lines reports lines as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96008] cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C nonnull warning and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96008 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- msebor: the warning is working correctly but the IL the C++ front end emits doesn't look right: AFAICS, it creates a function object for the lambda and calls its operator() with a null this pointer: ;

[Bug c++/95984] [11 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered. since r11-1697-g75ff24e1920ea6b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95984 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 96008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/96008] cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C nonnull warning and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96008 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95984] [11 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered. since r11-1697-g75ff24e1920ea6b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95984 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 David Edelsohn changed:

[Bug c/96009] New: missed optimization with floating point operations and integer literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96009 Bug ID: 96009 Summary: missed optimization with floating point operations and integer literals Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96008] New: cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C nonnull warning and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96008 Bug ID: 96008 Summary: cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C nonnull warning and ICE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/96008] cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C nonnull warning and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96008 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-30

[Bug tree-optimization/96007] -O2 miscompiles memcmp an object with a string literal containing '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96007 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/96007] -O2 miscompiles memcmp an object with a string literal containing '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96007 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/96007] -O2 miscompiles memcmp an object with a string literal containing '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96007 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/96007] New: -O2 miscompiles memcmp an object with a string literal containing '\0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96007 Bug ID: 96007 Summary: -O2 miscompiles memcmp an object with a string literal containing '\0' Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/96006] New: [GCOV] std::bind incorrectly marked as not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96006 Bug ID: 96006 Summary: [GCOV] std::bind incorrectly marked as not executed Product: gcc Version: 8.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code?

> These are the “true” ice-on-invalid-code bugs, i.e. those that are > meant to be classified as “ice-on-invalid-code” instead of “error-recovery” > in bugzilla. They generally get much more attention than “error-recovery” > bugs. And even those are lower priority than ice-on-valid bugs, and

[Bug target/96005] New: Add possibility to use newer ptx isa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96005 Bug ID: 96005 Summary: Add possibility to use newer ptx isa Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/94743] IRQ handler doesn't save scratch VFP registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94743 --- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon --- Not sure if we can close this PR: I have only implemented a part of what we discussed here. GCC now emits a warning so the user can take action to make sure his code is correct/correctly generated, but

Re: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code?

> I am sorry maybe I send this in a wrong place, I have sent this again in > gcc-bug-requ...@gcc.gun.org. Well that's even more wrong. g...@gcc.gnu.org would be the right place.

[Bug c++/96004] New: Copy elision with conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96004 Bug ID: 96004 Summary: Copy elision with conditional Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/94743] IRQ handler doesn't save scratch VFP registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94743 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c3b4224875d7b8bfd4126b9dd1d9cb028997285 commit r11-1732-g3c3b4224875d7b8bfd4126b9dd1d9cb028997285 Author: Christophe Lyon

[Bug c++/67302] [C++14] copy elision in return (expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67302 Antony Polukhin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/95355] [11 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand size mismatch for `vpmovzxbd' with -masm=intel since r11-485-gf6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c58dbf359479bc4cbfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95355 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/95366] [10/11 Regression] TYPE IS(character(*)) no longer matches since r10-3605-gf61e54e59cda5a2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95366 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/95855] A missing ifcvt optimization to generate fcsel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95855 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33d114f570b4a3583421c700396fd5945acebc28 commit r11-1731-g33d114f570b4a3583421c700396fd5945acebc28 Author: Yang Yang Date: Tue

[Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276 commit r9-8707-gdc0a56856417a91dc49fd1ea75e0802d0f5da276 Author: Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/95918] gfortran.dg/char4-subscript.f90 fails for BE architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95918 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

Re: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code?

Hi, Haoxin Tu via Gcc-bugs writes: > Hi, there, > > Our team just develop a c++ code generator tool to testing the compiler, > and those days I have reported 13 ICE bugs in ice-on-invalid-bugs. > > Here are the bugs links: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95972 >

[Bug fortran/95743] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95743 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e1d5e760513bf47931f99d0e5b277a5afcdb6d1 commit r10-8396-g6e1d5e760513bf47931f99d0e5b277a5afcdb6d1 Author: Thomas

[Bug c++/95516] [coroutines] incorrect warning "'coro.gro' is used uninitialized"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95516 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95711] namespace alias fails inside coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95711 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95519] [coroutines] non-functions for promise_type::return_void not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95519 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95736] coroutine method improperly copies awaitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95736 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95736] coroutine method improperly copies awaitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95736 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5a90f61ace5aca821224a658c223881d5b02388 commit r10-8394-gc5a90f61ace5aca821224a658c223881d5b02388 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/95711] namespace alias fails inside coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95711 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65025a6dae4b2c62ca79d2d0687229dafa93af7f commit r10-8395-g65025a6dae4b2c62ca79d2d0687229dafa93af7f Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-30

[Bug c++/95976] [[no_unique_address]] on union members has the opposite-of-intended effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95976 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/95976] [[no_unique_address]] on union members has the opposite-of-intended effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95976 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/96003] Maybe a false positive for -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- It happens all much sooner (in FE): $ cat a-folis.ii.004t.original ;; Function AppSelectionModel::AppSelectionModel() (null) ;; enabled by -tree-original { < ((struct Selection *) operator new (2))

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Losilla --- Oh my, my apologies about the duplicates. There was an issue with the website, I was just getting an error back: -- Software error: Invalid Content-Type 'subtype' parameter at

[Bug tree-optimization/96003] Maybe a false positive for -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- static_cast expanded into ptr ? cast(ptr) : NULL and maybe jump threading threading that into a NULL->release (); separate path?

[Bug debug/96002] New: Wrong argument value shown by gdb at Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96002 Bug ID: 96002 Summary: Wrong argument value shown by gdb at Og Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-debug Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug gcov-profile/95997] New: Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95997 Bug ID: 95997 Summary: Line containing "do" reported as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgcc/96001] New: aarch64: bti is missing from lse.S when built with branch protection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96001 Bug ID: 96001 Summary: aarch64: bti is missing from lse.S when built with branch protection Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/96000] New: Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96000 Bug ID: 96000 Summary: Line containing "do" reported as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/95996] New: Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95996 Bug ID: 95996 Summary: Line containing "do" reported as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 96000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 95997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 95996 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/95995] New: Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95995 Bug ID: 95995 Summary: Line containing "do" reported as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/95994] New: Line containing "do" reported as "not run"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95994 Bug ID: 95994 Summary: Line containing "do" reported as "not run" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/96003] New: Maybe a false positive for -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003 Bug ID: 96003 Summary: Maybe a false positive for -Werror=nonnull Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal