https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96055
Bug ID: 96055
Summary: avr: atmega324pb not supported
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96055
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@ after reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96056
Bug ID: 96056
Summary: arm v6/v7: Missing acquire barrier for
__atomic_compare_exchange(__ATOMIC_RELEASE,
__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96057
Bug ID: 96057
Summary: -Wreturn-type warning message disappears with -O1 to
-Os in unnamed namespace definition
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96057
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There was another report about static inline where this happens too. The same
reasoning applies here. The function is unused and there for there is no
undefined runtime behavior can happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96055
--- Comment #2 from Matwey V. Kornilov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@ after reading
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html .
Thanks. I did a month ago, but nobody has answered:
https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Bug ID: 96058
Summary: ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This fixes the ICE.
Confirmed, with the patch I get
Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type, found CHARACTER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch in PR 95025 fixes this issue.
The patch fixes the ICE, but I get the cryptic error
f951: Fatal Error: Writing module 'm' at line 15 column 14: Bad type in
constant expression
compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059
Bug ID: 96059
Summary: ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:575 with
-fdevirtualize-at-ltrans
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96060
Bug ID: 96060
Summary: ICE with spaceship default operator returning int
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94506
Hauke Mehrtens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
Bug ID: 96061
Summary: Please support 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute
on aarch64 (or maybe on all targets)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Multi delta should be able to reduce this. Normally reduce which .o files are
needed and then reduce the .ii files that needed to produce the .o files is the
way to reduce this ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:49AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
>
> --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The patch in PR 95025 fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>From several runs
frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f951`gfc_free_namespace(gfc_namespace*)
[inlined] free_uop_tree(uop_tree=0x00ce) at symbol.c:3881:17
frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-04
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Multi delta should be able to reduce this. Normally reduce which .o files
> are needed and then reduce the .ii files that needed to produce the .o files
> is the w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Popov ---
> We are working on -fzero-call-used-regs:
H.J. Lu, thanks for the information!
However, this flag can't be used per-function, like the attribute.
So supporting 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexander Popov from comment #2)
> > We are working on -fzero-call-used-regs:
>
> H.J. Lu, thanks for the information!
>
> However, this flag can't be used per-function, like the attribute.
Incorrec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> From several runs
>
> frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f951`gfc_free_namespace(gfc_namespace*)
> [inlined] free_uop_tree(uop_tree=0x000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backports will have to wait until PR96041 is resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96062
Bug ID: 96062
Summary: Partial register stall caused by avoidable use of
SETcc, and useless MOVZBL
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96040
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56a34e3e1cbb7d3b2f9298c14d4d3a3a030c7755
commit r10-8425-g56a34e3e1cbb7d3b2f9298c14d4d3a3a030c7755
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96040
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Popov ---
> Incorrect. There is also a zero_call_used_regs attribute.
Thanks, now I've found it in your tree:
```
You can control this behavior for a specific function by using the function
attribute @code{zero_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexander Popov from comment #4)
> > Incorrect. There is also a zero_call_used_regs attribute.
>
> Thanks, now I've found it in your tree:
>
> ```
> You can control this behavior for a specific func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Popov ---
>> Could you explain the connection between your attribute for zeroing
>> registers and 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute?
>
> We are porting
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/caller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexander Popov from comment #6)
> >> Could you explain the connection between your attribute for zeroing
> >> registers and 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute?
> >
> > We are porting
> >
> > http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
Bug ID: 96063
Summary: mismatched-tags warnings in stdlib headers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
31 matches
Mail list logo
