https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67792
Alex Kruppa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akruppa at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96732
Bug ID: 96732
Summary: ice in pop_nested_class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67792
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alex Kruppa from comment #4)
> Problem still exists in 10.2.0:
And everybody still just removes the build dir instead of using 'make clean'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96731
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tony E Lewis from comment #0)
> I can't see any obvious mention of constraints on
> uniform_int_distribution's IntType in
> http://eel.is/c++draft/rand.dist.uni.int
See http://eel.is/c++draf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95428
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733
Bug ID: 96733
Summary: std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code
than a combo of std::min / std::max
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:988fb2f597d67cdf3603654372c020c28448441f
commit r11-2797-g988fb2f597d67cdf3603654372c020c28448441f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:098a67ff74cca5f17ed630d870adf364c47031f6
commit r10-8652-g098a67ff74cca5f17ed630d870adf364c47031f6
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96718
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734
Bug ID: 96734
Summary: gcc 10.2.0 fails to compile on mips64 due to crash in
IPA SRA pass
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734
--- Comment #1 from Ariadne Conill ---
Manually compiling cp/method.o using:
g++ -c -o cp/method.o -O2 method.ii
works fine.
I wonder if this is somehow related to pre-compiled headers, actually.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #33 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b46584d7836bee011facdf946fd7241c748d66f0
commit r11-2799-gb46584d7836bee011facdf946fd7241c748d66f0
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-21
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96732
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95320
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2974c828615b240f66b208301b5a73c6a07fcb22
commit r10-8653-g2974c828615b240f66b208301b5a73c6a07fcb22
Author: Tobias Burnus
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96735
Bug ID: 96735
Summary: --enable-maintainer-mode broken
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:35:27AM +, jrfsousa at gmail dot com wrote:
> Done!
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054908.html
>
> Thank you very much.
>
Thanks for submitting. If no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96735
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
(And yes, I did run contrib/gcc_update)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96736
Bug ID: 96736
Summary: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/all_attributes.cc on
Darwin
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Another patch has been submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054907.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patches have been submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054903.html
and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054904.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patches have been submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054903.html
and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054904.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96724
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c44c2a3b0559979e3694ee2ab6860ec95fa3068a
commit r11-2800-gc44c2a3b0559979e3694ee2ab6860ec95fa3068a
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Jul 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737
Bug ID: 96737
Summary: ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96736
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like "cold" is defined in Darwin headers.
It needs to be moved after the #if check for Darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96735
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Checking out master instead of the branch I was on "fixed" things.
So, I guess may just be random timestamps in git, which do not
get updated correctly with contrib/gcc_update.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96736
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96736
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b5d4f6e6689cb80933aa5ac22684c83c7604a11
commit r11-2801-g9b5d4f6e6689cb80933aa5ac22684c83c7604a11
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96738
Bug ID: 96738
Summary: GCC generates worse assembly than clang and It fails
to vectorized code compared to clang
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96739
Bug ID: 96739
Summary: attribute(constructor) vs format NULL check
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95428
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96739
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96740
Bug ID: 96740
Summary: frexp, modf, and remquo missing attribute nonnull
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96740
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96741
Bug ID: 96741
Summary: ICE in value_dependent_expression_p when compiling
Boost.Xpressive in C++03 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
Bug ID: 96742
Summary: "warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘< 0’
is always false" with dependent values
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96743
Bug ID: 96743
Summary: ICE on flexible array in initializer list using
lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96743
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Stallard ---
A more complete output of the error:
/home/parallels/Perforce/kevin.stallard_Ubuntu18_Helios-Nucleus-Development_9171/BraceTest/BraceTest.cpp:
In constructor 'BraceTest::BraceTest()':
/home/parallels/Perfor
48 matches
Mail list logo