https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97157
Bug ID: 97157
Summary: -Wduplicated-branches: C ICE in hash_operand, at
fold-const.c:3768
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97156
Bug ID: 97156
Summary: Missed optimization [x86-64] tzcnt unnecessarily zeros
out destination register
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97155
Bug ID: 97155
Summary: set GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY="0 1"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 9.4 and 10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ec14c9a49aa6c35609eaf04f74132e28a2dc9d5
commit r9-8926-g3ec14c9a49aa6c35609eaf04f74132e28a2dc9d5
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdaf0ce0af30dfedac61ea1a7e842a45e55deb25
commit r9-8924-gbdaf0ce0af30dfedac61ea1a7e842a45e55deb25
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90f845adff0379682080a1253d477e0b621768b7
commit r9-8927-g90f845adff0379682080a1253d477e0b621768b7
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92978
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3043e490896ea37cd0273e6e149c3eeb3298720
commit r9-8928-gb3043e490896ea37cd0273e6e149c3eeb3298720
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97101
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90fdf477a1cb9ec756f21a09bc649185c3174c9a
commit r9-8925-g90fdf477a1cb9ec756f21a09bc649185c3174c9a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92787
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e00119c780f9bcd33181db4580754522f64c60e
commit r10-8783-g4e00119c780f9bcd33181db4580754522f64c60e
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94681
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eef40b0037b90ff117322423fc297dc528285524
commit r10-8784-geef40b0037b90ff117322423fc297dc528285524
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97130
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97130
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e19ecd79b45af6df87a6869d1936b857c9f71fc
commit r11-3341-g1e19ecd79b45af6df87a6869d1936b857c9f71fc
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15e7b93ba4256884c90198c678ed7eded4e73464
commit r11-3340-g15e7b93ba4256884c90198c678ed7eded4e73464
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97101
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8db568c3c6c3ca1c540198725e7490b819167209
commit r10-8782-g8db568c3c6c3ca1c540198725e7490b819167209
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 90583, which changed state.
Bug 90583 Summary: Implement DR 1722, lambda to function pointer conversion
should be noexcept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90583
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:defceb206be0f803b8d94e746180e51adad20b87
commit r11-3336-gdefceb206be0f803b8d94e746180e51adad20b87
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> I don't think we have an instruction for that? But we can inline the
> code we need instead of doing a library call, which is much faster.
> (We probably
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, sure, the code could use spec.back () != ' ' instead too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Maybe something like spec[ spec.size() - 1] would be a good way
to access the last element ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
According to this:
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/vector/vector/end/
Dereferencing end() is not allowed.
Now I know why static analyser cppcheck was complaining.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This looks valid to me.
spec.empty () || spec.end ()[-1] != ' '
Means if it empty or the last element is a space.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Source code is
if (spec.empty () || spec.end ()[-1] != ' ')
Looks suspicious to me. Is this allowed ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97154
Bug ID: 97154
Summary: gcc/c/c-decl.c:5729:38: error: Dereference of an
invalid iterator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05193687dde2e5a6337164182a1946b584acfada
commit r11--g05193687dde2e5a6337164182a1946b584acfada
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97153
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, that seems likely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ae110d4f8edd61cf56ee5fea62cadc8e781e8dc
commit r10-8780-g9ae110d4f8edd61cf56ee5fea62cadc8e781e8dc
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96994
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c5ce6099082b642294091c83461c928bd028ea1
commit r11-3332-g5c5ce6099082b642294091c83461c928bd028ea1
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97153
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I don't think we have an instruction for that? But we can inline the
code we need instead of doing a library call, which is much faster.
(We probably can use FMAs here usefully, btw; maybe even without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
--- Comment #5 from Ali Bahrami ---
I added -flive-patching=inline-only-static as suggested by Martin. It didn't
alter the results I'm seeing. There is still a lot of .localalias in the
resulting objects. Still, the optimizations it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97153
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] -Wformat|-Wformat causes libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97153
Bug ID: 97153
Summary: [10 Regression] -Wformat causes libstdc++ tests to
FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97136
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97152
Bug ID: 97152
Summary: Wrong code generation since commit b6ff3ddecfa
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97136
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
My guess is that the new external functions have to be added to
libsanitizer/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97143
Simon Willcocks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97130
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96821
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96307
--- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
ASAN related patches are seems need take more time than expect, I plan to fix
that this week, and I think ASAN is a new feature so that it won't back port to
GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
> More so, gcc variant occupies 2 reservation station entries (2 fused uOps) vs
> 4 entries by de-transformed sequence.
I don't think this is true for the test at hand? With base+offset memory
operand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97151
--- Comment #1 from Marat Radchenko ---
Another program that exhibits the same behavior:
int main()
{
int *a = new int[10];
a[0] = 0;
delete[] a;
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97151
Bug ID: 97151
Summary: GCC fails to optimize away uselessly allocated arrays
(C++)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6f58fb6196ba16ce070e3722451f040a13f963b
commit r11-3327-ge6f58fb6196ba16ce070e3722451f040a13f963b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 97139, which changed state.
Bug 97139 Summary: [11 Regression] Miscompare of
foreman_test_baseline_encodelog.out in 464.h264ref since
r11-3319-g48b0c1250a5c7d72be6b3fbbb1117d1cce43daee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97150
--- Comment #2 from David Spickett ---
Created attachment 49250
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49250=edit
preprocessed test file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love ---
I meant to show that x86_64 expands the built in fmod too. (I wasn't sure
whether "inline" was the right term, as it seems not to be done by
-finline-functions.)
Yes, xlf -O3 (?) and above imlies something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97143
Simon Willcocks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-elf |aarch64-elf, arm-eabi
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love ---
Created attachment 49249
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49249=edit
xlf -O5 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97150
--- Comment #1 from David Spickett ---
Created attachment 49248
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49248=edit
reproducer C file
Added test file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97150
Bug ID: 97150
Summary: [AArch64] 2nd parameter of unsigned Neon scalar shift
intrinsics should be signed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97131
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Btw, with -ffast-math (or -Ofast) on x86 you get fmod inlined, I guess xlf
> -O5
> is to some extent doing -ffast-math?
Xlf at -O3, -O4 and -O5 automatically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97149
--- Comment #1 from 康 珊 ---
Created attachment 49247
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49247=edit
test source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97149
Bug ID: 97149
Summary: sincos failed to be vectorized by gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to Ali Bahrami from comment #0)
> Rainer did a one off experiment that showed that it would be
> fairly easy to provide this. I'll leave it to him to describe.
Right: initially I looked around
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97099
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6ff694e592669e7865d39a884100dd677e7ceec
commit r11-3326-gb6ff694e592669e7865d39a884100dd677e7ceec
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49246
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49246=edit
Hack to disable .localalias* generation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
Bug ID: 97148
Summary: Add
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
#include "tree-vect.h"
int pix[4];
int __attribute__((noipa)) foo (void)
{
pix[0] = pix[0] / 4;
pix[1] = pix[1] / 4;
pix[2] = pix[2] / 4;
pix[3] = pix[3] / 4;
return pix[0] + pix[1] + pix[2] +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 49245
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49245=edit
patch I am testing
So the issue must be a bit subtle, I am testing the following patch on SPEC and
will try to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
--- Comment #3 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2)
> Richard, though register moves are resolved by renaming, they still occupy a
> uop in all stages except execution, and since renaming is one of the
> narrowest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, I've got the problem, it's bit later in the function:
The diff is:
diff -u before.txt after.txt
--- before.txt 2020-09-21 15:29:56.462394644 +0200
+++ after.txt 2020-09-21 15:29:48.086453128 +0200
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97132
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f10ed928e2f8ecc2c859abff8f2f9296b11b8d95
commit r11-3324-gf10ed928e2f8ecc2c859abff8f2f9296b11b8d95
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
So one can reproduce it with current master with:
-O3 -march=znver2 -g -flto=auto -flto-partition=one
where first bad debug counter value is:
-fdbg-cnt=vect_slp:357
The change is:
before:
_648 = pix.x;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The updated patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554383.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97088
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
also has this on ppc linux:
typedef struct {
__u32 u[4];
} __attribute__((aligned(16))) __vector128;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97147
Bug ID: 97147
Summary: GCC uses vhaddpd which is bad for latency
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97044
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97146
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
On arm, there is also:
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/composite-type.c (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97146
Bug ID: 97146
Summary: [11 regression] ipa/ipa-sra-*.c fail since r11-3303
(g:6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] Miscompare |[11 Regression] Miscompare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0df746afc50a47d1eb53a401e017c4373cf05641
commit r11-3321-g0df746afc50a47d1eb53a401e017c4373cf05641
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
--- Comment #5 from Liu Hao ---
I didn't keep a copy of the file. It was stage1 xgcc that ICEs, not the host
gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97145
Bug ID: 97145
Summary: Sanitizer pointer-subtract breaks constexpr functions
subtracting pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.0|
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96915
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d726ecd9554a805d4a5e044cb21ca23a7f7ca49f
commit r11-3320-gd726ecd9554a805d4a5e044cb21ca23a7f7ca49f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
