https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, with -ffast-math (or -Ofast) on x86 you get fmod inlined, I guess xlf -O5
is to some extent doing -ffast-math?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-21
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97065
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97062
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Using latest GCC release you can see what happens:
$ g++ pr96919.cc --coverage && ./a.out && gcov a-pr96919.cc -t
hello
libgcov profiling
error:/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/a-pr96919.gcda:overwriting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97144
Bug ID: 97144
Summary: [10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE (could not split insn) in
final_scan_insn_1 since r10-2553-g0fdc30bcf56
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97143
Bug ID: 97143
Summary: aarch64-none-elf Code generated for array after
another array within a global structure marked
volatile is broken.
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97142
Bug ID: 97142
Summary: __builtin_fmod not optimized on POWER
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's lim4 that does the bogus transform. It seems to be confused by the dead
store in BB3:
[local count: 118111600]:
a = 1;
a = 6;
*d.2_3 = 0;
ivtmp.15_9 = ivtmp.15_24 + 1;
if (c.7_7 != 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141
Bug ID: 97141
Summary: [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at
rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Version|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96307
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
May I ask about progress of the RISC-V sanitization enablement?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Version|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
Bug ID: 97140
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in error: unable to generate
reloads for since r10-400-gecfdb16c54ad06ac
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
Bug ID: 97139
Summary: [11 Regression] Miscompare of
foreman_test_baseline_encodelog.out in 464.h264ref
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97139
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97138
Bug ID: 97138
Summary: cross-BB vectorization opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Of course not, I don't have any libraries/headers for that.
What I meant is if you upload preprocessed source, one might try to reproduce
it with a cross that doesn't have anything (binutils, libraries,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
--- Comment #3 from Liu Hao ---
Did you reproduce the ICE when cross-compiling?
I suspect no, as the MSYS2 patch contains some twiddling about stack limits and
forces static linking of libgcc during bootstrapping, which should not affect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97137
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-21
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97137
Bug ID: 97137
Summary: Missed add-with-carry after FP compare
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97136
Bug ID: 97136
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap-asan fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96968
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5e73de00e9c853ce65333efada7409b0d00f758
commit r11-3317-gf5e73de00e9c853ce65333efada7409b0d00f758
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97132
--- Comment #4 from fsb4000 at yandex dot ru ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I'll test this:
>
> {
>static_assert(std::has_single_bit(_Align));
>_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT((std::uintptr_t)__ptr % _Align == 0);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97135
Bug ID: 97135
Summary: [11 Regression] Wrong code at -Os since
r11-408-g84935c98221
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97132
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I think there is no compliant way to test alignment assumptions during
> constant evaluations and after all, one should always see the actual objects
> and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96979
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97044
Clément Chigot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97132
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97132
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
>
> --- Comment #15 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97129
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386,x86-64 |x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97117
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |testsuite
Target Milestone|---
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
