https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #1 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk ---
Reverting changes clearly addition test cases are required
regards,
Mark
On 28/09/2020 10:48, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Bug ID: 97224
Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to
build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96799
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7)
> FWIW, Peter Cordes provides an overview of available approaches for
> extraction depending on vector length and ISA extensions (up to AVX2, not
> including
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96770
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Patch sent for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554957.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96767
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Patch sent for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554956.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #32 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> Honza - you put the finger to it, can't we refactor things so we apply
> this update in the caller after all stmts were processed?
The clone tree issue should not be too hard to solve. We need to keep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721
--- Comment #11 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No progress. I have no idea how to fix this and will no longer work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97222
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
would be interesting to see how ICC mangles the aligned case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-02-28 00:00:00 |2020-9-28
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97223
Bug ID: 97223
Summary: Failure to optimize comparison of char arithmetic to
comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #29)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #28)
> > > Probably you can try to tweak it in ix86_add_stmt_cost? when the statement
> >
> > Yes, it's the place.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #23)
> > _813 = {_437, _448, _459, _470, _490, _501, _512, _523, _543, _554, _565,
> > _576, _125, _143, _161, _179};
>
> The cost of vec_construct in i386 backend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #29 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #28)
> > Probably you can try to tweak it in ix86_add_stmt_cost? when the statement
>
> Yes, it's the place.
>
> > is UB to UH conversion statement, further check if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95614
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
