[Bug target/98470] ICE: "error: insn does not satisfy its constraints" with hard FP on xtensa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98470 --- Comment #3 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > What code should GCC generate if it wants to move the given > MEM into an FP register? The two main options are: > > (1) reload the literal

[Bug libgomp/98258] Can't compile programs for both OpenMP (CPU) + OpenACC (GPU)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258 --- Comment #9 from Chinoune --- I forget it Anyways $ gfortran-10 -fopenacc bug_omp_acc.o -lgomp -o test.x mkoffload: fatal error: either '-fopenacc' or '-fopenmp' must be set compilation terminated. lto-wrapper: fatal error: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_6

[Bug target/98348] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2 AVX512 Mask regression from GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|

[Bug ipa/98349] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movhps-1.c and sse-movlps.c fail after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 regression] |[11 regression] |cc.t

[Bug tree-optimization/98350] Reassociation breaks FMA chains

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98350 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/98351] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-andnps-1.c and sse2-andnpd-1.c fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98351 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/98352] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in implicitly_declare_fn, at cp/method.c:2914 since r9-6097-g9d35a27a8353b57e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4

[Bug c++/98353] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1053 since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98353 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/98355] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/98356] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_dot_deref_incomplete, at cp/parser.c:7899 since r9-4841-g2139fd74f31449c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98356 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98138] BB vect fail to SLP one case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #3) > > IIUC, in current implementation, we get four grouped stores: > { tmp[i][0], tmp[i][1], tmp[i][2], tmp[i][3] } /i=0,1,2,3/ independently > > When all these tryings

[Bug c++/98524] New: accepts-invalid instantiation of variable template with different function pointer type from declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98524 Bug ID: 98524 Summary: accepts-invalid instantiation of variable template with different function pointer type from declaration Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/98357] Bounds check not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever c

[Bug c++/98358] [8 Regression] new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98358 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|new test case |[8 Regression] new test

[Bug c++/98524] accepts-invalid instantiation of variable template with different function pointer type from declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98524 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Rogers --- Apologies for the fat-fingering when copying in the code which triggers this condition! The top of this bug report should read - Consider: template void (*TF)(); template void (*TF)(int); !!! Andrew

[Bug libgomp/98258] Can't compile programs for both OpenMP (CPU) + OpenACC (GPU)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov --- Thanks for checking. As for this: > Please, stop suggesting untested workarounds. Yes, I should have mentioned those are untested. I was typing the response late at night without access to offloading-c

[Bug tree-optimization/98365] Miss vectoization for signed char ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/98371] [10/11 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr69719.c fails for fixed-length 128-bit SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98371 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/98379] Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr in a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98379 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Version|unknown

[Bug c++/98383] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[10 Regression] internal

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|new test case |[11 Regression] new test

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Szőts Ákos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szotsaki at gmail dot com --- Comment #48 f

[Bug tree-optimization/98513] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- One last version: $ cat combined.cc unsigned var; unsigned array[2]; int zero = 0, minus_2 = -2; const int &max(const int &a, const int &b) { return a > b ? a : b; } void test(int minus_1) { for (unsigned

[Bug tree-optimization/98513] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/98396] gcc wrongly assumes that free preserves errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98396 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- But note that while free() may clobber errno the state after it is undefined (it's not documented to set it to any specific value). So I'd argue the check_errno_unmodified testcase is not really relevant.

[Bug tree-optimization/98513] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- This one is fishy: Intersecting int [-INF, minus_1_29(D) + 2] EQUIVALENCES: { i_3_14 } (1 elements) and int ~[-2147483647, -2147483646] to int [-INF, -INF] EQUIVALENCES: { i_3_14 } (1 elements) how c

[Bug tree-optimization/98513] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85316 CC|

[Bug target/98399] x86: Awful code generation for shifting vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98399 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/98403] [11 Regression] ICE: in add_def, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:837 with -Og -march=goldmont -fPIC -fcse-follow-jumps -fipa-ra -mforce-indirect-call since r11-6188-g0b76990a9d75d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98403 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/90806] Warray-bounds-2.c fail on cross-aarch64 on RH6 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > So you say that a not bootstrapped GCC 10 compiler compiled with > a recent host GCC 11 compiler folds to 1 while using a host GCC 10 (or 9) > compiler does not fold to 1? Sorry, I mixed things a little b

[Bug bootstrap/98414] [11 Regression] UBSAN bootstrap is broken: ubsan/ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cpp:162: undefined reference to `__dynamic_cast'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/98420] Invalid simplification of x - x with -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98420 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/98302] [9/10 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #15) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11) > > > which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3. > > > > What a great reduction, can you please share knowle

[Bug tree-optimization/98428] [11 regression] ICE with omp simd loop + optimization since r11-2062-gc4facd483de2d5b6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98428 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/98525] New: potential error in expand_call_inline error handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98525 Bug ID: 98525 Summary: potential error in expand_call_inline error handling Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/98429] Some FMA expressions are evaluated less efficiently when -ffast-math is active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98429 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/98365] Miss vectoization for signed char ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- > I hope vectorizer reduction can handle the upper sequence. After hacked in ifcvt, got .165.cvt [local count: 1057206201]: # cnt_21 = PHI # i_22 = PHI # ivtmp_19 = PHI _1 = (sizetype) i_22

[Bug rtl-optimization/98334] Failure to optimally optimize add loop to mul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98334 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4615cde5d7ef281d4b554df411f82ad707f0a54d commit r11-6456-g4615cde5d7ef281d4b554df411f82ad707f0a54d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug rtl-optimization/98438] Rather bad optimization of midpoint implementation for __int128 (and other types)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98438 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64 i?86 |x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* Target Milestone|

[Bug rtl-optimization/98334] Failure to optimally optimize add loop to mul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/98442] [X86] suboptimal for memset with CLEAR_BY_PIECES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98442 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Using ymm might also trigger dynamic stack realignment if we ever spill, also using ymm can be slower when the memory is unaligned (and/or when the CPU has split AVX support only). It will also require vzer

[Bug tree-optimization/98365] Miss vectoization for signed char ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- > > And successully vectorized. > Also vectorized loop with cnt defined as signed short. .i.e int foo (short a[64], short c[64]) { int i; short cnt=0; for (int i = 0;i != 64; i++) if (a[i] == c[i])

[Bug target/98522] _mm_cvttps_pi32 and _mm_cvtps_pi32 raise spurious FP exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98522 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/98431] Gcc uses a lot of compile-time and memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug c++/98327] C++ Module ICE on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > I suspect Martin failed to copy the first line of the testcase 'module;' > That's important -- it's not an English introduction of a piece of code :) > Yep, I failed to do that :) Anyway, now I can bisec

[Bug tree-optimization/96974] [10/11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vector_types_for_stmt compiling for SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98443] Failure to optimize out vector operations into a constant when possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98443 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98431] Gcc uses a lot of compile-time and memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98431 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/98448] [11 Regression] bootstrap-O3 comparison fails due to libcody

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/94802] Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- We can't really hash them the same but what is possible is at elimination time see whether x - y is available when x >= y is encountered and replace the latter with avail >= 0. If x - y is not available at

[Bug tree-optimization/94802] Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Which means it won't help for foo(): : if (b_2(D) >= a_3(D)) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : iftmp.0_5 = b_2(D) - a_3(D); : # iftmp.0_1 = PHI return iftmp.0_1;

[Bug tree-optimization/98526] New: [11 Regression] Double-counting of reduction cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98526 Bug ID: 98526 Summary: [11 Regression] Double-counting of reduction cost Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/98516] [11 Regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/97827] bootstrap error building the amdgcn-amdhsa offload compiler with LLVM 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97827 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus --- I unfortunately missed in my the LLVM patch that '.rodata' implies flags and messed up the check. Should by fixed by: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94072

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a20893cf6b95f60f5319b2196621acc65180125c commit r11-6457-ga20893cf6b95f60f5319b2196621acc65180125c Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue Ja

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98516] [11 Regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Minimal options: g++ pr98516.c -std=c++17 -O1 -ftree-slp-vectorize -fno-signed-zeros -fdbg-cnt=vect_slp:2 while this one is fine: g++ pr98516.c -std=c++17 -O1 -ftree-slp-vectorize -fno-signed-zeros -fdbg-cn

[Bug bootstrap/98414] [11 Regression] UBSAN bootstrap is broken: ubsan/ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cpp:162: undefined reference to `__dynamic_cast'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98414 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Maybe -static-libstdc++ with -fsanitize=undefined has an ordering issue? No, that does not help. I'm going to bisect that first..

[Bug c++/98459] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:923 since r6-6901-g876217ae71cf0b34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98463] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5491 by r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug target/98468] [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/98521] [x86] _mm256_cmov_si256 XOP function is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98521 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/98525] potential error in expand_call_inline error handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98525 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/98479] Missed optimization opportunity for unsigned __int128 modulo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98479 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/98481] [10/11 Regression] std::vector::size_type as return type gets tagged with abi:cxx11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98481 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI CC|

[Bug testsuite/98489] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr56719.c in r11-6374 has two failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98489 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/98492] C++ pp_gimple_stmt_1 doesn't output function call arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98492 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The problem is that pp == cxx_pp I guess. I wonder why lang_decl_name doesn't use a new pretty printer object instead?

[Bug bootstrap/98493] [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug go/98496] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on i686-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/95401] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect instruction with -O3 for AVX2 since r10-2257-g868363d4f52df19d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] GCC |[10 Regression] GCC

[Bug tree-optimization/98371] [10/11 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr69719.c fails for fixed-length 128-bit SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98371 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01be45eccee42d0cc6c900f43e2363186517f7ed commit r11-6458-g01be45eccee42d0cc6c900f43e2363186517f7ed Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug rtl-optimization/98403] [11 Regression] ICE: in add_def, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:837 with -Og -march=goldmont -fPIC -fcse-follow-jumps -fipa-ra -mforce-indirect-call since r11-6188-g0b76990a9d75d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98403 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a25be517f8de8c060705da13db283a268cf6d12 commit r11-6459-g8a25be517f8de8c060705da13db283a268cf6d12 Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug tree-optimization/98371] [10 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr69719.c fails for fixed-length 128-bit SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98371 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/98497] [Potential Perf regression] jne to hot branch instead je to cold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98497 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 Version|unknown

[Bug rtl-optimization/98403] [11 Regression] ICE: in add_def, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:837 with -Og -march=goldmont -fPIC -fcse-follow-jumps -fipa-ra -mforce-indirect-call since r11-6188-g0b76990a9d75d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98403 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug c++/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug c++/98501] potential optimization for base<->derived pointer casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug ada/98228] [11 Regression] ICE: Assert_Failure atree.adb:931: Error detected at s-gearop.adb:382:34 [a-ngrear.adb:313:7 [a-nllrar.ads:18:1]] on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228 --- Comment #9 from Marius Hillenbrand --- The failures in gnat1 during bootstrap have not led me anywhere, yet I found useful ICEs while running the test suite on the mostly-bootstrapped tree. The failing code in gnat appears compiled correctly,

[Bug c++/90926] [8/9/10/11 Regression] member char array with string literal initializer causes = {} to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90926 --- Comment #5 from thomgree at cisco dot com --- I made a fix for this bug here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562259.html

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Note the example clearly violates C TBAA rules and the "optimization" of eliding the data member(s) for 'head' are invalid. It's not only about diagnostics but about wrong-code generation waiting to happen

[Bug go/98504] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on ia64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98504 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/94802] Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug target/97144] [10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE (could not split insn) in final_scan_insn_1 since r10-2553-g0fdc30bcf56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97144 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eac8675225c4cdae347a11089f2b0a22ce920965 commit r11-6460-geac8675225c4cdae347a11089f2b0a22ce920965 Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug bootstrap/98509] [11 Regression] BUGURL quotation problem in libcody

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98509 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target Milestone|---

[Bug go/98510] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on sparc64-linux-gnu, building the 32bit multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc64-linux Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/97144] [10 Regression] SVE: ICE (could not split insn) in final_scan_insn_1 since r10-2553-g0fdc30bcf56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97144 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE |[10 Regression] SVE: ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/98512] [11 Regression] “#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored” ineffective in conjunction with alias attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98514] ICE in insert_operand_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98514 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- note the BB rank assignment via ++rank << 16 implies no more than 1 << 15 SSA defs in each BB as well. It would be better to simply assign the BB rank while traversing the IL in a DFS walk (SSA names pick u

[Bug tree-optimization/98516] [11 Regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8beba1cfc761cc35762283b3b44a355ef05e25b commit r11-6461-ge8beba1cfc761cc35762283b3b44a355ef05e25b Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c++/84964] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #9 from Willy Tarreau --- Hi Richard, indeed, the &curr->list == &head is the test for end of list that prevents any bad access from happening. I know that usually the right way to do this is by using a list element, but sometimes i

[Bug target/98136] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [aarch64] Internal compiler error with large classes and virtual methods since r8-5967-gf5470a77425a54efebfe1732488c40f05ef176d0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98136 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/98526] [11 Regression] Double-counting of reduction cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98526 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug pch/98527] New: [11 Regression] ICE in handle_pragma_pop_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98527 Bug ID: 98527 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in handle_pragma_pop_options Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: p

  1   2   3   >