[Bug c++/98801] Request for a conditional move built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think we need a builtin. Because we could just improve the code generation instead.

[Bug c++/97399] [9/10 Regression] g++ 9.3 cannot compile SFINAE code with separated declaration and definition, g++ 7.3 compiles

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] g++|[9/10 Regression] g++ 9.3

[Bug c++/97399] [9/10/11 Regression] g++ 9.3 cannot compile SFINAE code with separated declaration and definition, g++ 7.3 compiles

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58 commit r11-6878-ga8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug c++/88548] [9 Regression] this accepted in static member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58 commit r11-6878-ga8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug target/97683] [11 Regression] nios2 assembler branch offset errors building glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm pretty sure this is a gas bug. I used git bisect to track it down to binutils commit ae9d2233e61a98ff8dba56be10219aa5306ffc9a which caused gcc to start passing --gdwarf-5 on the gas command li

[Bug c++/98801] New: Request for a conditional move built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801 Bug ID: 98801 Summary: Request for a conditional move built-in function Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net --- Comment

[Bug libbacktrace/98732] libbacktrace could not find executable to open

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98732 郑之为 changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/98092] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 50040 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50040&action=edit Patch Patch in testing.

[Bug other/63792] libcc1 doesn't built i386 multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63792 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug ada/98228] [11 Regression] ICE: Assert_Failure atree.adb:931: Error detected at s-gearop.adb:382:34 [a-ngrear.adb:313:7 [a-nllrar.ads:18:1]] on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/94669] libcc1: 4 * minor performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug c++/96623] [11 Regression] ICE in inject_parm_decls, at cp/parser.c:23893

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96623] [11 Regression] ICE in inject_parm_decls, at cp/parser.c:23893

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c commit r11-6874-g89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c Author: Marek Polacek Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 50039 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50039&action=edit ELFv1 support Revised patches. I wasn't happy with the use of a ".text" symbol in the previous patch since some

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49701|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on invalid use of |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/98800] New: ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r251438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 Bug ID: 98800 Summary: ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r251438 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug debug/98796] Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/98796] Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b485fa167ef35c8facbd7c21cb86fd1abc77efcf commit r11-6868-gb485fa167ef35c8facbd7c21cb86fd1abc77efcf Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Long from comment #10) > Still fails with 10.2.0. Can you say which release version will include the > fix? According to https://gcc.gnu.org/, gcc 10.2 was released in July 202

[Bug ada/98228] [11 Regression] ICE: Assert_Failure atree.adb:931: Error detected at s-gearop.adb:382:34 [a-ngrear.adb:313:7 [a-nllrar.ads:18:1]] on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228 --- Comment #15 from Marius Hillenbrand --- tl;dr: I found the root cause and a way to repro on x86. When the gnat/gcc interface converts gnat entities into tree decls, maybe_pad_type() pads some record types. maybe_pad_type() calls make_packabl

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans.c b/gcc/fortran/trans.c index a2376917635..7699e98f6ea 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans.c @@ -689,9 +689,14 @@ gfc_call_mallo

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 --- Comment #10 from Bill Long --- Still fails with 10.2.0. Can you say which release version will include the fix?

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is still failing for me so I'd guess that Alan's patch is not submitted yet.

[Bug target/98092] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Segher: Yup, I saw the buzilla. Will take a look at it. Carl On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 18:49 +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 > >

[Bug target/98799] [10 Regression] vector_set_var ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/98799] New: [10 Regression] vector_set_var ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799 Bug ID: 98799 Summary: [10 Regression] vector_set_var ICE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/97588] Overzealous SRA of boolean bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98744] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3246 since r11-6735-g424deca72b63e644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98744] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3246 since r11-6735-g424deca72b63e644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90cbc769006a43ed17d2384b3a0a4634f315d3fd commit r11-6866-g90cbc769006a43ed17d2384b3a0a4634f315d3fd Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fr

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool --- We cannot allow "m" to allow pcrel memory accesses, because most existing inline assembler code will break then. So we then need some way to tell the compiler that some instruction *does* allow pcrel m

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/95693] [8/9/10 Regression] Incorrect error from undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] |I

[Bug sanitizer/95693] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect error from undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9ed18295bfc6d69d40af197e059e16622cd94c6 commit r11-6865-ga9ed18295bfc6d69d40af197e059e16622cd94c6 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25fc4d01a8ed1888e6a65597a3387349eb3c950c commit r11-6864-g25fc4d01a8ed1888e6a65597a3387349eb3c950c Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #5 from Bill Long --- Original customer is asking again...

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50037 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50037&action=edit gcc11-pr98681.patch Therefore, if you want to use UINTVAL in that function wherever possible, we can, but we ne

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c806314b32987096d79de21e72dc0cf783e51d57 commit r10-9288-gc806314b32987096d79de21e72dc0cf783e51d57 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 --- Comment #5 from Bill Long --- Is this fixed in a release version of GCC?

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, for the mask, the question is if we should or shouldn't handle e.g. unsigned foo (unsigned int x) { return (x << 13) & (-1U << 13); } or unsigned bar (unsigned int x) { return (x << 0) & -1U; } I thin

[Bug fortran/98565] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3950

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98565 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf8ee9e4eed6ba1a6d77b4cf168df480e1f954da commit r11-6863-gbf8ee9e4eed6ba1a6d77b4cf168df480e1f954da Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri Ja

[Bug tree-optimization/47059] compiler fails to coalesce loads/stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47059 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7e681fc3afff24a6279058cbb0b0dc4cd96be8c commit r11-6862-gd7e681fc3afff24a6279058cbb0b0dc4cd96be8c Author: Martin Jambor Date: Fr

[Bug c++/98744] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3246 since r11-6735-g424deca72b63e644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > looks strange, isn't DECL_HAS_IN_CHARGE_PARM_P (fn) false on all > base constructors (as those are the abstract ctors with the in_charge > parameter removed and i

[Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 --- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > So I see that > >242: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT UND > > and that's indeed broken (UND SECTION?) but ld complains that the SECTION > ty

[Bug c++/98744] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3246 since r11-6735-g424deca72b63e644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- For shft_amnt that single UINTVAL check will make sure it is not negative, so whether the rest uses INTVAL or UINTVAL is then irrelevant. Up to you as maintainer what you want there. As for mask, let me check

[Bug c++/98798] New: Custom operator new[] and delete[] is buggy for aligned class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98798 Bug ID: 98798 Summary: Custom operator new[] and delete[] is buggy for aligned class Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/98766] [10 Regression] SVE: ICE in tree_to_shwi with -O3 --param=avoid-fma-max-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE |[10 Regression] SVE: ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/98766] [10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE in tree_to_shwi with -O3 --param=avoid-fma-max-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d33785f57daf29dc0c106c919da319fe1906bc6 commit r11-6861-g9d33785f57daf29dc0c106c919da319fe1906bc6 Author: Kyrylo Tkachov Date:

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- Patch looks generally sensible, but I think all the INTVALs in that expression should be converted to UINTVAL. The mask, in particular, is unsigned and it is weird that one moment we're using a unsigned v

[Bug target/93053] [9 Regression] libgcc build failure with old binutils on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93053 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/98797] New: Simpler version of the XFAIL in casts-1.c with proposed solution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98797 Bug ID: 98797 Summary: Simpler version of the XFAIL in casts-1.c with proposed solution Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98570] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Maybe it was r226992 and our bisect binaries are broken :/.

[Bug testsuite/98325] [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/98570] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/98565] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3950

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98565 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/98681] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/98573] Dynamic type lost on assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98573 --- Comment #6 from David Neill Asanza --- Thanks for looking into this Paul. I'm looking forward to having this fixed. :)

[Bug testsuite/98795] modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/98795] modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eee8ed2f22b36dfe64a9516171871476e8ede477 commit r11-6860-geee8ed2f22b36dfe64a9516171871476e8ede477 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug debug/98796] Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50034 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50034&action=edit gcc11-pr98796.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/98255] [10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with -fPIC on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Fixed on the trunk. Not sure what to do in 10.3. Same, if there's no fallout.

[Bug tree-optimization/98793] [11 Regression] wrong code with --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=4 since r11-6468-g01da03c915f086fb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/98793] [11 Regression] wrong code with --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=4 since r11-6468-g01da03c915f086fb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4be156d6bef317b8704052f11431457a577ed564 commit r11-6859-g4be156d6bef317b8704052f11431457a577ed564 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug debug/98796] Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/98796] New: Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796 Bug ID: 98796 Summary: Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98756] Suspicious "(*this)." in mangled symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98756 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3a8ef8ef2ac077b393687624b09db6ab31c7746 commit r11-6858-ge3a8ef8ef2ac077b393687624b09db6ab31c7746 Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Thu J

[Bug target/98065] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7024 since r11-5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b29225597584b697762585e0b707b7cb4b427650 commit r11-6857-gb29225597584b697762585e0b707b7cb4b427650 Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Thu J

[Bug target/79251] PowerPC vec_insert generates store-hit-load if the element number is variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79251 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b29225597584b697762585e0b707b7cb4b427650 commit r11-6857-gb29225597584b697762585e0b707b7cb4b427650 Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Thu J

[Bug c++/98756] Suspicious "(*this)." in mangled symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98756 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug driver/98783] Wrong ouput of "-O3 -Q --help=optimizers" on gcc built with --enable-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to hasse.christoph from comment #5) > I wasn't aware of this fix yet, sorry for the duplicate. That's fine, you could not know about it :) > I really appreciate you taking the time to solve this so

[Bug driver/98783] Wrong ouput of "-O3 -Q --help=optimizers" on gcc built with --enable-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783 --- Comment #5 from hasse.christoph at cern dot ch --- I wasn't aware of this fix yet, sorry for the duplicate. I really appreciate you taking the time to solve this so quickly! :)

[Bug driver/98783] Wrong ouput of "-O3 -Q --help=optimizers" on gcc built with --enable-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/98793] [11 Regression] wrong code with --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=4 since r11-6468-g01da03c915f086fb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- however reverting the fix for PR82099 lets the build succeed again. it also fixes the mkvtoolnix build (https://bugs.debian.org/PR980596).

[Bug libstdc++/98785] _Unwind_ForcedUnwind going through a non-empty exception specification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98785 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- FWIW I think this belongs to the libgcc or c++ components, as _Unwind_ForcedUnwind is not defined in libstdc++.

[Bug driver/98783] Wrong ouput of "-O3 -Q --help=optimizers" on gcc built with --enable-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783 --- Comment #3 from hasse.christoph at cern dot ch --- --help=optimizers on GCC 10.2.0 build with --enable-frame-pointer prints: -fomit-frame-pointer[enabled] This flag should however be disabled by default.

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- I've moved the testsuite issues to 98795

[Bug testsuite/98795] modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98795] New: modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Bug ID: 98795 Summary: modules testsuite testnames Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite As

[Bug gcov-profile/98739] -fprofile-reproducible is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b46027c6544d3680b3647d3c771c9844b8b95772 commit r11-6856-gb46027c6544d3680b3647d3c771c9844b8b95772 Author: Martin Liska Date: Fri

[Bug target/94368] [9 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3074(error: could not split insn) on aarch64-linux-gnu since r9-3744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94368 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org Status|ASSI

[Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Version|10.0

[Bug driver/98783] Wrong ouput of "-O3 -Q --help=optimizers" on gcc built with --enable-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška

[Bug driver/98794] @file error checking is inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98794 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.

[Bug tree-optimization/98793] [11 Regression] wrong code with --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=4 since r11-6468-g01da03c915f086fb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] wrong code |[11 Regression] wrong code

[Bug driver/98794] New: @file error checking is inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98794 Bug ID: 98794 Summary: @file error checking is inconsistent Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug c++/98452] error: unknown Compiled Module Interface: no such module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98452 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose --- I tried to apply the trunk fix for PR98659 on the gcc-10 branch, but it still shows an ICE.

[Bug tree-optimization/98793] [11 Regression] wrong code with --param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Looks like an interaction between threading and vector lowering, with -mavx512bw it works (using SDE).

[Bug target/98092] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug other/98790] [10/11 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1 (Segmentation Fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > I think it's fixed with r11-6804-g2b27f37f90cb66e2. But it fails on gcc-10 branch since g:ff22b4e8d0613170601d28eec9462ea31147c7c7. @Marek: Can you please take a l

[Bug tree-optimization/98766] [10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE in tree_to_shwi with -O3 --param=avoid-fma-max-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 fro

  1   2   >