https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99275
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff7a5154460e2830e244c350cc8f7c35913de70e
commit r11-7417-gff7a5154460e2830e244c350cc8f7c35913de70e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Summary|C++2a synchronis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092
--- Comment #10 from Mel Chen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> (In reply to Mel Chen from comment #8)
> > Sorry for using the bad example to describe the problem I am facing. Let me
> > clarify my question with a more precise ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #14 from Liu Hao ---
Created attachment 50259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50259&action=edit
a much simpler testcase
Added a much simpler testcase.
`xmm6` is set to `123.456`, and an exception is thrown and c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99282
Bug ID: 99282
Summary: Emit .cfi_sections without arguments for
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99281
Bug ID: 99281
Summary: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at
function.c:984
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drewb at valvesoftware dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96485
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c657339d6a4a671b4cd8bc62ba4e0df6bfc7c72
commit r11-7416-g7c657339d6a4a671b4cd8bc62ba4e0df6bfc7c72
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0159535adb0e7400f2c6922f14a7602f6b90cf69
commit r11-7415-g0159535adb0e7400f2c6922f14a7602f6b90cf69
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9967bbfceddce755b18bdbecc6d0c56e994a05cc
commit r11-7413-g9967bbfceddce755b18bdbecc6d0c56e994a05cc
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Thu Feb 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a505fad4dd4d93b6d642995d7df320aa40949568
commit r11-7410-ga505fad4dd4d93b6d642995d7df320aa40949568
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE when |[10 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bd409cfc83683a9be5c6b3b8f9a3ec8959f9356
commit r11-7409-g6bd409cfc83683a9be5c6b3b8f9a3ec8959f9356
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50257|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
And another one: 'expectting'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99280
Bug ID: 99280
Summary: argument to warning_n must be a string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99279
Bug ID: 99279
Summary: ICE in rs6000_init_builtins when compiling using
-mcpu=440
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88136
Nikita Kniazev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nok.raven at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Ack, will fix that too, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
Another trivial typo, also in builtins.c: 'epecting' should be 'expecting'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99277
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99278
Bug ID: 99278
Summary: typo in diagnostic: 'may reade'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99277
Bug ID: 99277
Summary: C++2a synchronisation is inefficient in GCC 11 and
can't be fixed later
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu has:
I messed up the copy and paste here; the x86_64 gimple actually reads:
bits.b0 = 1;
_1 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
_2 = _1 & 1;
_3 = _2 !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Failing test is in test_45 at:
__analyzer_eval (bits.b0 == 1); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" "desired" { xfail
*-*-* } } */
/* { dg-warning "UNKNOWN" "status quo" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kwok Yeung :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d656bfda2d8316627d0bbb18b10954e6aaf3c88c
commit r11-7407-gd656bfda2d8316627d0bbb18b10954e6aaf3c88c
Author: Kwok Cheung Yeung
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99276
Bug ID: 99276
Summary: grammar in diagnostics for overflowing the destination
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99257
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99275
Bug ID: 99275
Summary: missing space in 'argument missing terminating nul'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99213
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99213
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb9a1e929db520fd741e60d84ec1a58581a8299
commit r11-7406-g7fb9a1e929db520fd741e60d84ec1a58581a8299
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94521
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb9a1e929db520fd741e60d84ec1a58581a8299
commit r11-7406-g7fb9a1e929db520fd741e60d84ec1a58581a8299
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
Bug ID: 99274
Summary: [modules] Error when compiling some system headers as
modules after
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99103
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99273
Bug ID: 99273
Summary: List initialization prefers initializer_list a little
too strongly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99103
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:676f6f3277181662cf3ed07769edfa2d4fb7df28
commit r11-7405-g676f6f3277181662cf3ed07769edfa2d4fb7df28
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99176
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC |[8/9/10 Regression] GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99176
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ffc26458dd7ba7b3fa00897f2d8c6cd24ba06f3
commit r11-7404-g2ffc26458dd7ba7b3fa00897f2d8c6cd24ba06f3
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99272
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97587
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8ff3f8efeda02a6bedebfaf20b93645ae3bb5b8
commit r11-7403-gb8ff3f8efeda02a6bedebfaf20b93645ae3bb5b8
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95822
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7005a50d0121954031a223ea5a6c57aaa7e3efd3
commit r11-7402-g7005a50d0121954031a223ea5a6c57aaa7e3efd3
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99272
Bug ID: 99272
Summary: False positive -Wredundant-tags warning when reusing a
name
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98942
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:40:13PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> In check_variable(), looking at gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->actual,
> there is locus information.
there is *no* locus info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #19 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #18)
> But there are other blocks control dependend on bb4, namely bb5 and bb9.
> To see this observe that bb9 doesn't pdom bb4, but there's a path from bb4 to
> bb9 (e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #18 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 50248 [details]
> > dot of the CFG as CD-DCE sees it
>
> (gdb) p debug_dominance_info (CDI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50254|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99271
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 regression] Wrong|[10 regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99259
--- Comment #3 from Benoit Jacob ---
Thanks for bringing up the topic of early-clobber. I had to look up some
explanation of that concept, but I found that and now I get what you're saying
- thanks!
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15819794/wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99271
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44ab1cc1df6ec4ff50210401acdcb26e80343541
commit r11-7400-g44ab1cc1df6ec4ff50210401acdcb26e80343541
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318
--- Comment #16 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Which tests are failing and how?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99166
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9592deabf3c6b9e23aa7a5b84724672cb7c8d560
commit r11-7399-g9592deabf3c6b9e23aa7a5b84724672cb7c8d560
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99102
Joel Hutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] Tuple |[9/10 Regression] Tuple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99233
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:557a0d3b1b389c46d5a8aa24e27abed4c401d17e
commit r11-7394-g557a0d3b1b389c46d5a8aa24e27abed4c401d17e
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01c2ce169a05c8e59c4182796876f7e0754e4b5c
commit r11-7393-g01c2ce169a05c8e59c4182796876f7e0754e4b5c
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31002af9040876dfb6444fabd524b11ca0739519
commit r11-7391-g31002af9040876dfb6444fabd524b11ca0739519
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Interestingly, in C99 we have:
Types are partitioned into object types (types that fully describe objects),
function types (types that describe functions), and incomplete types (types
that describe o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99271
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99271
Bug ID: 99271
Summary: [10/11 regression] Wrong code for Arm-v8-m.main CMSE
calling __gnu_cmse_nonsecure_call
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99193
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
There are quite a lot of these - I will try removing them
when we get the updated GCC in Fedora.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99267
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96178
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99193
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
BTW, looking at the
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wanalyzer-null-argument"
at
https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/f19fd566f6387ce7e4d82409528c9dde374d25e0/df/main.c#L317
I'm guessing that thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #11 from Liu Hao ---
My personally built GCC [1] didn't seem able to reproduce this, using exact the
same options. The latest commit from GCC repo was
700dcc60b5646cc64ae3ba72a79a7542b4902b50.
Were there any differences when building
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
Bug ID: 99270
Summary: Testsuite 27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc failure on
DragonFly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269
Bug ID: 99269
Summary: False positive
-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak/-Wanalyzer-double-free with
-fanalyzer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #17 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> Of course since -ffinite-loops and the C++ standard require forward progress
> here and all testcases expect the loop to not terminate we're in the realm
> of u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99268
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99268
Bug ID: 99268
Summary: shifted uint64_t becomes wrong value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bf9e68a9589f9d3ace3663a17ff923191144c3b
commit r11-7389-g2bf9e68a9589f9d3ace3663a17ff923191144c3b
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99265
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Of course since -ffinite-loops and the C++ standard require forward progress
here and all testcases expect the loop to not terminate we're in the realm of
undefined behavior. But I'm not yet convinced the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 50254
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50254&action=edit
Tentative fix
To be serious tested since it tweaks the SEH prologue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Further simplified, but still depends on -ffinite-loops
volatile int xx;
int main()
{
int jobs_ = 1;
int at_eof_ = 0;
while (1)
{
for (int i = 0; i < jobs_; i++)
{
if (at_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
jyong at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz70 at googlemail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99265
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c74a83acee3f51e6753b8159fa600fe2d86810
commit r11-7388-g75c74a83acee3f51e6753b8159fa600fe2d86810
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99267
Bug ID: 99267
Summary: Build fails for AIX 6.1
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99264
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> This looks like a serious compatibility breakage on the glibc side though.
POSIX does not require that the constant is usable in preprocessor macros, so
the cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99265
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Targe
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo