[Bug fortran/99506] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug c++/99505] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c++/99507] New: Can't return static address from immediate function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99507 Bug ID: 99507 Summary: Can't return static address from immediate function Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/vnPToT Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/99506] New: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506 Bug ID: 99506 Summary: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99505] New: ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Bug ID: 99505 Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99372] gimplefe-28.c ICEs when sqrt insn is not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99372 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva --- I didn't mean that the testcase didn't check, I meant that the gimple parser didn't check. It swallows the .SQRT call even though it the attempt to expand the call will ICE because there's no usable opcode

[Bug tree-optimization/99504] New: Missing memmove detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99504 Bug ID: 99504 Summary: Missing memmove detection Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #35 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- Created attachment 50345 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50345&action=edit Parametrized input files for test coverage testing. These are the .i files that go with my prev

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

release Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 11.0.1 20210309 (experimental) (GCC) The program names are fib-1.c to fib-5.c, fib-k.c contains 2^k copies of fibonacci. /pkgs/gcc-mainline/bin/gcc -march=native -D___CAN_IMPORT_CLIB_DYNAMICALLY -O1 -Wno-unu

[Bug c++/99500] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/99503] New: sanitizers build error for android cross toolchain. error: 'SA_ONSTACK' was not declared in this scope;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99503 Bug ID: 99503 Summary: sanitizers build error for android cross toolchain. error: 'SA_ONSTACK' was not declared in this scope; Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/99502] missing -Warray-bounds on partial out of bounds access in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99502 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-10 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/99502] New: missing -Warray-bounds on partial out of bounds access in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99502 Bug ID: 99502 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on partial out of bounds access in C++ Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/99501] New: Can't forward declare partial specialization of template with NTTP previously partially specialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99501 Bug ID: 99501 Summary: Can't forward declare partial specialization of template with NTTP previously partially specialized Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godb

[Bug libstdc++/99499] build failure for android bionic toolchains. error: '_U' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Probably just remove this file and use the generic one it would work? https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/config/os/bionic/ctype_base.h

[Bug c++/99500] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery CC|

[Bug c++/99500] New: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 Bug ID: 99500 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at

[Bug libstdc++/99499] New: bootstrap failure for bionic toolchains. error: '_U' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499 Bug ID: 99499 Summary: bootstrap failure for bionic toolchains. error: '_U' was not declared in this scope Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/99497] _mm_min_ss/_mm_max_ss incorrect results when values known at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99497 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- And another question is if we without -ffast-math ever create MIN_EXPR/MAX_EXPR and what exactly are the rules for those, if it is safe to expand those into SMAX etc., or if those need to use UNSPECs too.

[Bug target/99497] _mm_min_ss/_mm_max_ss incorrect results when values known at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99497 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Simplified: #include void print128 (__m128 var) { float val[4]; __builtin_memcpy (val, &var, sizeof(val)); __builtin_printf ("%f %f %f %f \n", val[0], val[1], val[2], val[3]); } int main () { __m12

[Bug testsuite/99498] New: [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/opt/pr99305.C in r11-7587 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99498 Bug ID: 99498 Summary: [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/opt/pr99305.C in r11-7587 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99497] New: _mm_min_ss/_mm_max_ss incorrect results when values known at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99497 Bug ID: 99497 Summary: _mm_min_ss/_mm_max_ss incorrect results when values known at compile time Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug other/99496] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 Bug ID: 99496 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||88781 Keywords|

[Bug target/99094] [AIX] Thread local uninitialized data allocated in .comm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- GCC should place uninitialized static variables into a separate "section anchor" pool.

[Bug debug/99490] -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil --- LLDB testsuite failure from it is: PASS: LLDB (/usr/bin/gcc-x86_64) :: test_with_run_command_dwarf (TestTypeCompletion.TypeCompletionTestCase) error: a.out {0x5850}: DIE has DW_AT_ranges(0x0) attribute,

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/99205] [10/11 Regression] Out of memory with undefined character length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64 --- Comment #4 from Marti

[Bug debug/99490] -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/99491] [mips64] over-strict refusal to emit tail calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/99495] New: constexpr virtual destructor is used before its definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99495 Bug ID: 99495 Summary: constexpr virtual destructor is used before its definition Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/GGY6aa Status: UNCO

[Bug c/99494] isfinite gets optimized away with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99494 --- Comment #2 from arek_koz at o2 dot pl --- Sorry for trouble, my bad.

[Bug c/99494] isfinite gets optimized away with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99494 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/99494] New: isfinite gets optimized away with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99494 Bug ID: 99494 Summary: isfinite gets optimized away with -Ofast Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/99493] New: Address of template parameter object is not a valid template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99493 Bug ID: 99493 Summary: Address of template parameter object is not a valid template argument Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/9zYo8f S

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b610c30453d8e4cc88693d85a5a100d089640be5 commit r11-7587-gb610c30453d8e4cc88693d85a5a100d089640be5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug target/94177] TLS global-dynamic model clobbers function parameter on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94177 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-09 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/99492] New: double and double _Complex not aligned consistently on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99492 Bug ID: 99492 Summary: double and double _Complex not aligned consistently on AIX Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/99491] New: [mips64] over-strict refusal to emit tail calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99491 Bug ID: 99491 Summary: [mips64] over-strict refusal to emit tail calls Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #8) > > On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:58 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org > > wrote: > > > > Sure. I used C-Vise: > > https://github.com/marxin/cvise > > From my understanding, cvi

[Bug preprocessor/61474] ICE (segfault) in preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61474 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug debug/99490] -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil --- Created attachment 50341 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50341&action=edit range-gcc.s

[Bug debug/99490] -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil --- Created attachment 50340 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50340&action=edit range-clang.s

[Bug debug/99490] New: -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 Bug ID: 99490 Summary: -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao --- > On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:58 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > Sure. I used C-Vise: > https://github.com/marxin/cvise >From my understanding, cvise is similar as creduce, but faster. So, I am still won

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Khem Raj changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Host|

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] New: internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Bug ID: 99489 Summary: internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name() Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c/99454] internal compiler error: kernel module tg3 tg3_start_xmit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99454 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb5d9e8361892a627f5ef9dda7f356f34000ed5b commit r11-7584-gfb5d9e8361892a627f5ef9dda7f356f34000ed5b Author: Vladimir N. Makarov D

[Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin --- in version 20210308 diagnostic changed: In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/iomanip:45: /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/bits/quoted_string.h: In destructor ‘constexpr std::allocator< >::~a

[Bug sanitizer/99418] more cases where -fsanitize=bounds can check one-past-the-end accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99418 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||56456 Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/99459] [11 Regression] Many coroutines regressions on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99459] [11 Regression] Many coroutines regressions on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99459 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e252e23d34932f13f39cc6544bf5c9379fa2a87 commit r11-7582-g4e252e23d34932f13f39cc6544bf5c9379fa2a87 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10/11 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|8.5

[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10/11 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6051af8e3db9e6cea79d0e86da0e0dad286f7e4e commit r10-9426-g6051af8e3db9e6cea79d0e86da0e0dad286f7e4e Author: Eric Botcazou

[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10/11 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:defafb78cbcb7e2d5abd40379afdecee8b1a0d06 commit r11-7579-gdefafb78cbcb7e2d5abd40379afdecee8b1a0d06 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: T

[Bug c/99454] internal compiler error: kernel module tg3 tg3_start_xmit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99454 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- The patch is not enough. It seems that there are other asms in the test which results in LRA crash.

[Bug target/99487] [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99487 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-03-09 5:58 a.m., doko at debian dot org wrote: > during RTL pass: final > ../../src/gcc/function.c: In function 'void expand_function_start(tree)': > ../../src/gcc/function.c:5213:1: inte

[Bug c++/99478] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE when decltype lambda in template list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99478 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104 --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- I have a bisect in progress.

[Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/99423] [modules] ICE tree check: expected tree_vec, have ggc_freed in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99318] [10/11 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/99454] internal compiler error: kernel module tg3 tg3_start_xmit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99454 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9725df0233b6fb6e761875968b3b8e9fd9f522ac commit r11-7578-g9725df0233b6fb6e761875968b3b8e9fd9f522ac Author: Vladimir N. Makarov D

[Bug target/99488] dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/99318] [10/11 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7fff4c43a24dee1db4153250455e6040a1afce commit r11-7576-gea7fff4c43a24dee1db4153250455e6040a1afce Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/99472] [modules] std=c++2b flag appears incompatible with C++20 module code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99472] [modules] std=c++2b flag appears incompatible with C++20 module code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b3d86a7768a7562798f17f074f540fbc288ec3b commit r11-7575-g4b3d86a7768a7562798f17f074f540fbc288ec3b Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug ipa/82094] Improve diagnostics about target specific option mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82094 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- One similar place where we do something similar is: rtx ix86_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target, rtx subtarget, machine_mode mode, int ignore) ... gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/

[Bug ipa/82094] Improve diagnostics about target specific option mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82094 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug rtl-optimization/99469] ICE: qsort checking failed with selective scheduling on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99469 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82407 --- Comment #2 from Alexander

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50338 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50338&action=edit gcc11-pr99305.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c.jj2021-01-22 11:41:38.078708425 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c 2021-03-09 13:15:02.649094949 +0100 @@ -808,14 +808,14 @@ conditional_replacement (basic_block con nonz

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Indeed. > But perhaps instead of adding new effective target tests, in this case it > could > be resolved by: [... wrapping the bulk of main

[Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Keywo

[Bug c++/99459] [11 Regression] Many coroutines regressions on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/99488] dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||syq at debian dot org Known to wor

[Bug target/99488] New: dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488 Bug ID: 99488 Summary: dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/93628] ranges::equal_to doesn't work for types convertible to function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- LWG 3530 should mean we don't have to support such silly types. https://wg21.link/lwg3530 However, we are still required to impose a total order on function pointers, which means ranges::less/greater/less_

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed. But perhaps instead of adding new effective target tests, in this case it could be resolved by: --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/pr98920.c.jj2021-03-08 23:40:33.935447429 +0100 +++ gcc/tes

[Bug c++/99456] [11 regression] ABI breakage with some static initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50331|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/99487] [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99487 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- complete build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-10&arch=hppa&ver=10.2.1-21&stamp=1615045917&raw=1 /<>/build/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/<>/build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/hppa-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostd

[Bug target/99487] [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99487 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17 from

[Bug target/99487] New: [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99487 Bug ID: 99487 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug fortran/99477] CONTIGUOUS assumed-shape dummy not working with associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99477 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99456] [11 regression] ABI breakage with some static initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately the #c9 patch caused +FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 9) +FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-82304.C -std=c++17 (test for errors, line 9) +FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1

[Bug gcov-profile/99485] [GCOV] When the function pointer is used as a parameter, the coverage information is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99485 --- Comment #2 from Yang Wang --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > The result shows that function "free" was executed 5 times. > > Yes, the last 4 calls happen from libgcov run-time where memory is released: > > (gdb) bt > #0 fre

[Bug gcov-profile/99485] [GCOV] When the function pointer is used as a parameter, the coverage information is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99485 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/99470] Convert fixed index addition to array address offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99470 Mathias Stearn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

  1   2   >