.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210311 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99481
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin ---
Not seen anymore in version 20210311
); }
| ^
compilation terminated.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210311 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965
William Bader changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williambader at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99492
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95015
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94751
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566369.html
Also note https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98352#c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98352
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Valid test from bug 97372:
class Lockable {
public:
Lockable(int *);
};
template class ThreadTask2 {
Lockable _state_mutex{[]() -> int * { static int srcloc; return 0; }()};
public:
ThreadTask2() {}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public at enkore dot de
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 90480, which changed state.
Bug 90480 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE when calling operator() inside a
lambda defined in a template class method
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90480
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at olupton dot com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90480
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sfranzen85 at hotmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97214
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Before the patches function process_address_1 used CONSTRAINT__UNKNOWN
> (taken from '=' of constraint "=T,..." and this is wrong) to check validity
> address. It was invalid and LRA added reloads for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99548
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> For aarch64 we get:
> ldp x4, x3, [x1]
> mov x7, 38
> ldp x6, x5, [x2]
> ldr x8, [x1, 16]
> add x6, x4, x6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
The above patch fixes the feasibility issue in (b) above, and the analyzer now
successfully emits a diagnostic for the leak.
The only remaining issue is (a) (see comment #9 above).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99553
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3857edb5d32dcdc11d9a2fe3ad7c156c52a1ec7f
commit r11-7640-g3857edb5d32dcdc11d9a2fe3ad7c156c52a1ec7f
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3857edb5d32dcdc11d9a2fe3ad7c156c52a1ec7f
commit r11-7640-g3857edb5d32dcdc11d9a2fe3ad7c156c52a1ec7f
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50370
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50370&action=edit
Requested proprocessed files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seurer@marlin:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite$
/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++7/../../xg++
-B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++7/../../
/home/seure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e33e5b042a6a830c40cee3d0a925bc49dcfe069
commit r11-7639-g5e33e5b042a6a830c40cee3d0a925bc49dcfe069
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f958348e78f38d91f0611618bb909182170c0f3
commit r11-7638-g3f958348e78f38d91f0611618bb909182170c0f3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #13 from Thiago Macieira ---
> Since my patch uses output_asm_insn to finish the instruction, %P must be
> the last operand.
Okay.
If I wanted to abuse, I could just swap it around:
$ ~/dev/gcc/bin/gcc -fPIC -fno-plt -S -o - -O2 -x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99557
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99557
Bug ID: 99557
Summary: [AIX] Alignment of double for struct and C++ classes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #10)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> > Don't use %P with cmp.
>
> I know, but that's besides the point. I was merely trying to find something
> that would have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99112
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> For whatever reason, the chunk in gfc_conv_intrinsic_size doesn't quite work
> correctly because the wrong message is selected. Thus a bit more work is
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Don't use %P with cmp.
I know, but that's besides the point. I was merely trying to find something
that would have a reason to type more after the %P and show that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26ed5a28b18ad080e51e6b61f5f60d67b66fd5f3
commit r11-7633-g26ed5a28b18ad080e51e6b61f5f60d67b66fd5f3
Author: David Edelsohn
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #8)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > Created attachment 50369 [details]
> > The v2 patch
>
> Code generation with "call %P0" is now identical to what GCC genera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Here are my findings.
Before the patches function process_address_1 used CONSTRAINT__UNKNOWN (taken
from '=' of constraint "=T,..." and this is wrong) to check validity address.
It was invalid and LRA a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97949
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99248, which changed state.
Bug 99248 Summary: [modules] ICE expected binding_vector, have overload in
lookup_elaborated_type_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:8013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f27a9f90d4eadadf937f1a5d0bfccf39261f330
commit r11-7632-g5f27a9f90d4eadadf937f1a5d0bfccf39261f330
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #8 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> Created attachment 50369 [details]
> The v2 patch
Code generation with "call %P0" is now identical to what GCC generates on its
own.
Even the alignment is now right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932
--- Comment #33 from David Hoyer ---
(In reply to Paul Smith from comment #32)
> No movement AFAIK. It's apparently the tip of a particularly gross iceberg.
> It doesn't seem like partial measures appeal to people, and no one has the
> needed co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932
--- Comment #32 from Paul Smith ---
No movement AFAIK. It's apparently the tip of a particularly gross iceberg.
It doesn't seem like partial measures appeal to people, and no one has the
needed combination of time, knowledge, and contacts to at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932
David Hoyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhoyer at netapp dot com
--- Comment #31 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #24)
> This can be reproduced with a minimal Ada cross-compiler, i.e. you just need
> the gnat1 compiler, the skeleton of libada and the command line:
> $(srcdir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50366|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I looked through the test results on all our testers and it looks like
everything is cleaned up now. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Cannot reproduce it on gcc135 either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99533
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for gcc-11 only for now.
This got added to the wrong bug because I used the wrong PR number in the
changelog ...
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cfb38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Worked around in libstdc++ on master only for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98599
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
I no longer believe the patch in comment #9 is correct.
My latest analysis of this issue is:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564070.html
(I was hoping for a response from Honza on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99537
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15825b17cf3fbf28181c51fe94a2898f448f915c
commit r11-7629-g15825b17cf3fbf28181c51fe94a2898f448f915c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99537
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cfb387388a90730ab36ac24d9049677db633a11
commit r11-7628-g8cfb387388a90730ab36ac24d9049677db633a11
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67e397660611990efd98f9e4106c1ee81f6803a4
commit r11-7627-g67e397660611990efd98f9e4106c1ee81f6803a4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edc61d34eb4212d5547e9f628b5f7f4d15ee0060
commit r11-7626-gedc61d34eb4212d5547e9f628b5f7f4d15ee0060
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99556
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lewis at sophists dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99556
Bug ID: 99556
Summary: time_get::date_order() returns no_order on
en_US - it should return mdy
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I've filed PR99555 "[OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested OpenMP
'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
Bug ID: 99555
Summary: [OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested
OpenMP 'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99551
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
probably one of the if-conversion passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99554
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99554
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SVE: ICE (segfault) in |[10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99554
Bug ID: 99554
Summary: SVE: ICE (segfault) in recog.c:extract_asm_operands
during expand
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99552
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's useful to know, thanks.
The current header-based implementation is experimental and those aligned
objects will be moved into the library at some point, where we can probably
control their placement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #6 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Created attachment 50366 [details]
> A patch
>
> I am testing this.
This has now changed to:
$ ~/dev/gcc/bin/gcc -fPIC -fno-plt -S -o - -O2 test.c | grep call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #1)
> Matching Clang/LLVM bug report:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
Bad copy & paste. That's https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Created attachment 50366 [details]
> A patch
>
> I am testing this.
The same string pattern for loading from the GOT exists elsewhere in the file.
Maybe this is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Guess we can try what happens when using -fno-merge-debug-strings with recent
binutils...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
So gcc/dwarf2out.c creates it as:
#define DEBUG_STR_SECTION_FLAGS \
(HAVE_GAS_SHF_MERGE && flag_merge_debug_strings \
? SECTION_DEBUG | SECTION_MERGE | SECT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99553
Bug ID: 99553
Summary: libgo/misc/cgo/testcarchive/testdata/main_unix.c:39:
suspicious compare ?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99552
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-03-11 10:08 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/wait_notify/bool.cc (test for excess errors)
>> Excess errors:
>> /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99552
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-03-11 10:08 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> Usually, I add "-fno-common" to avoid these warnings on hppa*-*-hpux*.
> Isn't that redundant for C++, and on by default for C in GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |wrong-code
--- Comment #3 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99550
--- Comment #1 from Yves Delley ---
See https://godbolt.org/z/ErEh55
Bug also submitted at https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+bug/1918693
Which is the right tracker for this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99552
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99533
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard says that skip_permission_denied means to ignore "an error
indicating that permission to access p is denied" and it's pretty clearly
intended to correspond to std::errc::permission_denied error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 50366
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50366&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
It actuallys is the -fcheck=mem part that triggers the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Voila, here is a short reproducer:
module commands
implicit none
private
type, abstract :: range_t
integer :: step_mode = 0
integer :: n_step = 0
end type range_t
type, extends (range_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99552
Bug ID: 99552
Summary: FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/wait_notify/bool.cc (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93660
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Ugh. :-( Where are we tracking this, and is anyone working on this? It's
clearly not useful to have (nvptx offloading) testing to run into known
TIMEOUTs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so push_partial_def could simply record the first non-constant def and upon
the second, if it completes all bits handle some easy cases (VEC_PERM_EXPR,
COMPLEX_EXPR come to my mind, eventually also CONS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #15 from Kwok Yeung ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #13)
> Kwok, it seems -- at least in my testing -- that your latest commit
> d656bfda2d8316627d0bbb18b10954e6aaf3c88c "openmp: Fix intermittent hanging
> of task-detach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565740.html ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|wrong-code
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
