[Bug target/99718] [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/99718] [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/99719] ICE during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue on MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99719 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-msys2-mingw-w64, |x86_64-msys2-mingw-w64

[Bug c/99720] Feature Request: Better errors for C++ features when compiling C (pass by reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99720 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99711] Crash when reading an allocated character array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99711 --- Comment #6 from philippe.wautelet at aero dot obs-mip.fr --- Hello, The segfault occurs on the read line. If I allocate the array with the right number of lines (allocate( character(len=10) :: cbulist_ru(4)), I get exactly the same behavior

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So we end up scheduling t.f90:1:16: note: node 0x35514b8 (max_nunits=1, refcnt=1) t.f90:1:16: note: op: VEC_PERM_EXPR t.f90:1:16: note: { } t.f90:1:16: note: lane permutation { 0[0] 1[1] } t.f90

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50454 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50454&action=edit patch I'm testing this patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Just for the record, started with g:ad2603433853129e847cade5e269c6a5f889a020.

[Bug c++/99484] [modules] ICE same canonical type node for different types ‘void’ and ‘std::__void_t<_Op<_Args ...> >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Lelyakin --- Not seen anymore. At least in version 20210322.

[Bug c++/99722] New: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210323 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO wa

[Bug c++/99479] [modules] ICE Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Lelyakin --- in gcc version 20210323: All three sequences now produce "Segmentation fault" instead of "corrupted double-linked list". However the error "corrupted double-linked li

[Bug fortran/99688] AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address at gfc_match_name(char*) gcc/fortran/match.c:685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99688 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:129afa080badc7884c08668ed67a1e4da61bb7da commit r10-9522-g129afa080badc7884c08668ed67a1e4da61bb7da Author: Tobias Burnus D

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e07e7a6a7f34f0ec2f1a3e50ebc52b77de11a30 commit r11-7776-g3e07e7a6a7f34f0ec2f1a3e50ebc52b77de11a30 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug target/99719] ICE during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue on MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99719 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- yes it is a working gcc. it just fails in this specific case since today which i fixes my library. Get Outlook for Android From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffa6a7fba1f87b6b47763882be411a339061492d commit r11-7784-gffa6a7fba1f87b6b47763882be411a339061492d Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99721] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_schedule_slp_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90262] Inline small constant memmoves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90262 --- Comment #3 from Liu Hao --- This exists on x86_64 too: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/z5MW4E4aE ```c int xcopy(char* dst, const char* src) { __builtin_memmove(dst, src, 32); return dst[0]; } ``` Clang generates this assembly: ```

[Bug target/99723] New: arm: ICE in build_function_type during selftests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99723 Bug ID: 99723 Summary: arm: ICE in build_function_type during selftests Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug target/99724] New: [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 Bug ID: 99724 Summary: [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/99724] [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/99706] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|9.4 Summary|[10/11 Regression

[Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 99680, which changed state. Bug 99680 Summary: [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|jakub at gcc do

[Bug target/99723] arm: ICE in build_function_type during selftests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99723 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |arm --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- @

[Bug target/99581] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during RTL pass: final - void QTWTF::TCMalloc_PageHeap::scavengerThread() since r11-7526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99725] New: arm: ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa with -mcmse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99725 Bug ID: 99725 Summary: arm: ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa with -mcmse Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726 Bug ID: 99726 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc

[Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > The demangler does the right, although confusing thing. Because the Itanium > ABI says that g is __float128: >::= f # float >:

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > So if we had a time machine we could mangle double-double as 'u8__ibm128' Or even 'u2dd' for "double double" :-)

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- If we had a time machine, I strongly hope that double double wouldn't exist at all. It is a fast but completely useless type without any usable numerical properties.

[Bug c++/51066] [C++0x] warning about binding an rvalue-reference to an implicit conversion result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51066 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This warning would also help with this horror: https://twitter.com/zygoloid/status/1367301323838812160 #include void f(float&&) { puts("float"); } void f(int&&) { puts("int"); } template void g(T x) { f(x

[Bug c++/99484] [modules] ICE same canonical type node for different types ‘void’ and ‘std::__void_t<_Op<_Args ...> >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 Bug 99227 depends on bug 99484, which changed state. Bug 99484 Summary: [modules] ICE same canonical type node for different types ‘void’ and ‘std::__void_t<_Op<_Args ...> >’ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484 What

[Bug target/99706] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99706 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Tried --- aarch64-simd.md.jj1 2021-03-08 23:40:33.846448416 +0100 +++ aarch64-simd.md 2021-03-23 12:40:51.325018722 +0100 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ [(set (match_operand:VQMOV 0 "nonimmediate_operand"

[Bug target/99719] ICE during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue on MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99719 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #4 from c

[Bug c++/51066] [C++0x] warning about binding an rvalue-reference to an implicit conversion result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51066 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- And this one https://twitter.com/wakomeup/status/1274778577087627267 struct B { }; struct D : B { }; B b; D&& d(b); // binds to implicit conversion result D&& dd(std::move(b)); // binds to im

[Bug c++/99239] [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6acd6692f1ac3c2ece3da36178df73e3b12c4f65 commit r11-7785-g6acd6692f1ac3c2ece3da36178df73e3b12c4f65 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug c++/99239] [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 Bug 99227 depends on bug 99239, which changed state. Bug 99239 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c89c9e9c6b59260c7745c8714b69f94784a9c13 commit r11-7786-g9c89c9e9c6b59260c7745c8714b69f94784a9c13 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Mar 21 19:

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ee221e98e6a9363fe962b1babbe92eba286fa18 commit r10-9523-g6ee221e98e6a9363fe962b1babbe92eba286fa18 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun M

[Bug target/99718] [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/99727] New: [11 Regression] MVE: ICE (segfault) in arm_print_operand at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99727 Bug ID: 99727 Summary: [11 Regression] MVE: ICE (segfault) in arm_print_operand at -O3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99727] [11 Regression] MVE: ICE (segfault) in arm_print_operand at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99727 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66cd00cf21b80ed3dc7678e60e41b6ac6085 commit r9-9303-g66cd00cf21b80ed3dc7678e60e41b6ac6085 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Mar

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3553e057df3a7fb2524339b1681fe3153ae7d568 commit r8-10816-g3553e057df3a7fb2524339b1681fe3153ae7d568 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Ma

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99724] [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-23 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c++/99728] New: code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 Bug ID: 99728 Summary: code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99724] [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #1 from Martin Reinecke --- Created attachment 50457 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50457&action=edit generated assembler

[Bug target/99724] [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- E.g. I can't find a neg pattern in iwmmxt.md either, so r11-5990-g4cbb7cab47a3b91a12ad52baab5bbe6e4373ce73 is problematic too. And r11-6616-g25bef68902f42f414f99626cefb2d3df81de7dc8 too (don't see any UNSPEC_

[Bug target/99706] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke --- Created attachment 50458 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50458&action=edit additional test case by Alexander Monakov

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/99724] [11 Regression] CE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99724 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Oops sorry, indeed it's likely that several of my other patches in this area introduced the same problem. I did lots of 'make check' though, too bad iwmmxt isn't covered well.

[Bug analyzer/99714] warn about alloca/dealloc mismatches based on calls with same object in different functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99714 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- The C case in comment #0 doesn't look like what I think you meant to write, and the analyzer (correctly IMHO) complains about a leak: : In function 'init': :22:61: warning: leak of 'p' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-

[Bug target/99540] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7cea7ceff9a2be7436108030c598628c51fba0f commit r11-7787-gd7cea7ceff9a2be7436108030c598628c51fba0f Author: Richard Sandiford Da

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek --- I have tried the mingw gcc/binutils crosses we have in Fedora (gcc 10.2.1) and get: i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -h ./pr98860.exe ./pr98860.exe: file format pei-i386 Sections: Idx Name Size

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- FWIW, using std::experimental::native_simd also does not hoist the stores out of the loop. However, if you pass d by value and return d, the issue goes away. So I guess this is an aliasing pessimizatio

[Bug target/99582] No intrinsics to access rcl or rcr instruction on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99582 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/99582] No intrinsics to access rcl or rcr instruction on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99582 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > RCL and RCR are supported via microcode sequencer on Intel and involve many > (9) uops on modern AMD, so they are quite slow in comparison to simple > shifts/rotat

[Bug target/99727] [11 Regression] MVE: ICE (segfault) in arm_print_operand at -O3 since r11-6616-g25bef689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99727 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Summar

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #5 from Martin Reinecke --- (In reply to Matthias Kretz (Vir) from comment #4) > FWIW, using std::experimental::native_simd also does not hoist the > stores out of the loop. However, if you pass d by value and return d, the > issue go

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- > I guess I need it for unaligned loads/stores, correct? Otherwise __v4df > should work everywhere. 1. You can freely reinterpret_cast by value between all the different [[gnu::vector_size(N)]] types

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #7 from Martin Reinecke --- Thanks! (BTW, I'm aware your code and will immediately switch to it once it lands in gcc! But for the time being I try to make do with my poor man's version to avoid the external dependency.)

[Bug middle-end/99714] warn about alloca/dealloc mismatches based on calls with same object in different functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99714 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93660] Decl mismatch between fndecl TYPE and used arglist / ICE in ipa_simd_modify_function_body, at omp-simd-clone.c:993

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93660 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:212f4988f37ccf788c8c72b1dc952980bc9be3b7 commit r11-7788-g212f4988f37ccf788c8c72b1dc952980bc9be3b7 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Tu

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #46 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is there a machine parsable output from objdump? I'm not sure if using gawk would be OK. Such a test also won't work in build != host conditions. I'm considering just having a notice in the gcc-11

[Bug c++/99318] [10/11 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:831f9f768eb1fbf9a31d9a89591188b1487b6376 commit r11-7789-g831f9f768eb1fbf9a31d9a89591188b1487b6376 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/99318] [10 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression] |-Wdep

[Bug c++/99728] code pessimization when using wrapper classes around SIMD types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's landed r11-6935 aka g:2bcceb6fc59fcdaf51006d4fcfc71c2d26761396

[Bug c++/99729] New: Tweak -Wdeprecated-declarations with namespaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99729 Bug ID: 99729 Summary: Tweak -Wdeprecated-declarations with namespaces Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c++/99729] Tweak -Wdeprecated-declarations with namespaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99729 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #47 from Jakub Jelinek --- Does mingw/cygwin always use GNU binutils? At least for ld.bfd, a quick and reliable test could be $gcc_cv_ld --verbose 2>&1 | grep -q '\.debug_loclists.*BLOCK.*__section_alignment__.*NOLOAD.*:' && $gcc_cv_l

[Bug target/99593] [11 Regression] arm Neon ICE when compiling firefox (skia) since r11-6708

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b1f841ce0ccf30eda7896ba5ab0aa94c72307b2 commit r11-7799-g6b1f841ce0ccf30eda7896ba5ab0aa94c72307b2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/99730] New: gcc cannot choose the best overload resolution with constrained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99730 Bug ID: 99730 Summary: gcc cannot choose the best overload resolution with constrained function Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #19 from Worx --- It's seems that the patch fix the issue. Unfortunately, I have another error, but it's maybe i do not proper configure "-march=c3" make[3]: Leaving directory '/opt/gcc/host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/libdecnumber' make[3

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #48 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Now that's an interesting trick I never thought of. There's LLVM based mingw, but I have never used nor do I know if it is relevant here. Gold is ELF only as far as I know, so it would never be us

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #19) > It's seems that the patch fix the issue. > > Unfortunately, I have another error, but it's maybe i do not proper > configure "-march=c3" > > > > make[3]: Leaving director

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #21 from Worx --- Sorry about the dumb question, but how to know ?

[Bug testsuite/99731] New: g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99731 Bug ID: 99731 Summary: g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #21) > Sorry about the dumb question, but how to know ? Run it under gdb and disassemble. It should show which instruction caused the problem.

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50459 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50459&action=edit gcc11-pr98860.patch In that case this completely untested patch which could work, but no way to really test it

[Bug c++/99732] New: gcc accepts overload a member function without ref-qualifier with a member function with a ref-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99732 Bug ID: 99732 Summary: gcc accepts overload a member function without ref-qualifier with a member function with a ref-qualifier Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug analyzer/99716] -Wanalyzer-double-fclose when fclose is called inside a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99716 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #50 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'll try testing it out over the next few days, thanks for the patch.

[Bug c++/99730] gcc cannot choose the best overload resolution with constrained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99730 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99730] gcc cannot choose the best overload resolution with constrained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99730 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See https://wg21.link/p2113 which was implemented in r11-1571

[Bug target/99733] New: darwin: missing ':' in error message about munmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99733 Bug ID: 99733 Summary: darwin: missing ':' in error message about munmap Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/99734] New: [modules] ICE in most_specialized_instantiation

cc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210323 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

[Bug analyzer/99716] -Wanalyzer-double-fclose when fclose is called inside a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99716 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones --- FYI the original code is: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/e0a11061035d47b118c95706240bcc17fd576edc/tests/mount-local/test-parallel-mount-local.c#L299-L335

[Bug c++/99734] [modules] ICE in most_specialized_instantiation

se_file() ../../gcc/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1218 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210323 (experimental) Copyright

[Bug target/99733] darwin: missing ':' in error message about munmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99733 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99732] gcc accepts overload a member function without ref-qualifier with a member function with a ref-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99732 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 jyong at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50459|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/99730] gcc cannot choose the best overload resolution with constrained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99730 --- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 --- Really appreciate your reply and explanation.

  1   2   >